Lemma 20.54.1. Let X be a ringed space. Let \mathcal{I} be an injective \mathcal{O}_ X-module. Let \mathcal{E} be an \mathcal{O}_ X-module. Assume \mathcal{E} is finite locally free on X, see Modules, Definition 17.14.1. Then \mathcal{E} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{I} is an injective \mathcal{O}_ X-module.
20.54 Projection formula
In this section we collect variants of the projection formula. The most basic version is Lemma 20.54.2. After we state and prove it, we discuss a more general version involving perfect complexes.
Proof. This is true because under the assumptions of the lemma we have
where \mathcal{E}^\vee = \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{O}_ X}(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{O}_ X) is the dual of \mathcal{E} which is finite locally free also. Since tensoring with a finite locally free sheaf is an exact functor we win by Homology, Lemma 12.27.2. \square
Lemma 20.54.2. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of ringed spaces. Let \mathcal{F} be an \mathcal{O}_ X-module. Let \mathcal{E} be an \mathcal{O}_ Y-module. Assume \mathcal{E} is finite locally free on Y, see Modules, Definition 17.14.1. Then there exist isomorphisms
for all q \geq 0. In fact there exists an isomorphism
in D^{+}(Y) functorial in \mathcal{F}.
Proof. Choose an injective resolution \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{I}^\bullet on X. Note that f^*\mathcal{E} is finite locally free also, hence we get a resolution
which is an injective resolution by Lemma 20.54.1. Apply f_* to see that
Hence the lemma follows if we can show that f_*(f^*\mathcal{E} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{F}) = \mathcal{E} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ Y} f_*(\mathcal{F}) functorially in the \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{F}. This is clear when \mathcal{E} = \mathcal{O}_ Y^{\oplus n}, and follows in general by working locally on Y. Details omitted. \square
Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of ringed spaces. Let E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X) and K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ Y). Without any further assumptions there is a map
Namely, it is the adjoint to the canonical map
coming from the map Lf^*Rf_*E \to E and Lemmas 20.27.3 and 20.28.1. A reasonably general version of the projection formula is the following.
Lemma 20.54.3. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of ringed spaces. Let E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X) and K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ Y). If K is perfect, then
in D(\mathcal{O}_ Y).
Proof. To check (20.54.2.1) is an isomorphism we may work locally on Y, i.e., we have to find an open covering \{ V_ j \to Y\} such that the map restricts to an isomorphism on V_ j. By definition of perfect objects, this means we may assume K is represented by a strictly perfect complex of \mathcal{O}_ Y-modules. Note that, completely generally, the statement is true for K = K_1 \oplus K_2, if and only if the statement is true for K_1 and K_2. Hence we may assume K is a finite complex of finite free \mathcal{O}_ Y-modules. In this case a simple argument involving stupid truncations reduces the statement to the case where K is represented by a finite free \mathcal{O}_ Y-module. Since the statement is invariant under finite direct summands in the K variable, we conclude it suffices to prove it for K = \mathcal{O}_ Y[n] in which case it is trivial. \square
Here is a case where the projection formula is true in complete generality.
Lemma 20.54.4. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of ringed spaces such that f is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset. Then (20.54.2.1) is an isomorphism always.
Proof. Since f is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset, the functor f_* is exact (Modules, Lemma 17.6.1). Hence Rf_* is computed by applying f_* to any representative complex. Choose a K-flat complex \mathcal{K}^\bullet of \mathcal{O}_ Y-modules representing K and choose any complex \mathcal{E}^\bullet of \mathcal{O}_ X-modules representing E. Then Lf^*K is represented by f^*\mathcal{K}^\bullet which is a K-flat complex of \mathcal{O}_ X-modules (Lemma 20.26.8). Thus the right hand side of (20.54.2.1) is represented by
By the same reasoning we see that the left hand side is represented by
Since f_* commutes with direct sums (Modules, Lemma 17.6.3) it suffices to show that
for any \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{E} and \mathcal{O}_ Y-module \mathcal{K}. We will check this by checking on stalks. Let y \in Y. If y \not\in f(X), then the stalks of both sides are zero. If y = f(x), then we see that we have to show
(using Sheaves, Lemma 6.32.1 and Lemma 6.26.4). This equality holds and therefore the lemma has been proved. \square
Remark 20.54.5. The map (20.54.2.1) is compatible with the base change map of Remark 20.28.3 in the following sense. Namely, suppose that
is a commutative diagram of ringed spaces. Let E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X) and K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ Y). Then the diagram
is commutative. Here arrows labeled t are gotten by an application of Lemma 20.27.3, arrows labeled b by an application of Remark 20.28.3, arrows labeled p by an application of (20.54.2.1), and c comes from L(g')^* \circ Lf^* = L(f')^* \circ Lg^*. We omit the verification.
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)