Lemma 28.22.4. Let X be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let \mathcal{F} be a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module. Let U \subset X be a quasi-compact open. Let \mathcal{G} be an \mathcal{O}_ U-module which is of finite presentation. Let \varphi : \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{F}|_ U be a morphism of \mathcal{O}_ U-modules. Then there exists an \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{G}' of finite presentation, and a morphism of \mathcal{O}_ X-modules \varphi ' : \mathcal{G}' \to \mathcal{F} such that \mathcal{G}'|_ U = \mathcal{G} and such that \varphi '|_ U = \varphi .
Proof. The beginning of the proof is a repeat of the beginning of the proof of Lemma 28.22.2. We write it out carefully anyway.
Let n be the minimal number of affine opens U_ i \subset X, i = 1, \ldots , n such that X = U \cup \bigcup U_ i. (Here we use that X is quasi-compact.) Suppose we can prove the lemma for the case n = 1. Then we can successively extend the pair (\mathcal{G}, \varphi ) to a pair (\mathcal{G}_1, \varphi _1) over U \cup U_1 to a pair (\mathcal{G}_2, \varphi _2) over U \cup U_1 \cup U_2 to a pair (\mathcal{G}_3, \varphi _3) over U \cup U_1 \cup U_2 \cup U_3, and so on. Thus we reduce to the case n = 1.
Thus we may assume that X = U \cup V with V affine. Since X is quasi-separated and U quasi-compact, we see that U \cap V \subset V is quasi-compact. Suppose we prove the lemma for the system (V, U \cap V, \mathcal{F}|_ V, \mathcal{G}|_{U \cap V}, \varphi |_{U \cap V}) thereby producing (\mathcal{G}', \varphi ') over V. Then we can glue \mathcal{G}' over V to the given sheaf \mathcal{G} over U along the common value over U \cap V, and similarly we can glue the map \varphi ' to the map \varphi along the common value over U \cap V. Thus we reduce to the case where X is affine.
Assume X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R). By Lemma 28.22.1 above we may find a quasi-coherent sheaf \mathcal{H} with a map \psi : \mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{F} over X which restricts to \mathcal{G} and \varphi over U. By Lemma 28.22.2 we can find a finite type quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-submodule \mathcal{H}' \subset \mathcal{H} such that \mathcal{H}'|_ U = \mathcal{G}. Thus after replacing \mathcal{H} by \mathcal{H}' and \psi by the restriction of \psi to \mathcal{H}' we may assume that \mathcal{H} is of finite type. By Lemma 28.16.2 we conclude that \mathcal{H} = \widetilde{N} with N a finitely generated R-module. Hence there exists a surjection as in the following short exact sequence of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules
where \mathcal{K} is defined as the kernel. Since \mathcal{G} is of finite presentation and \mathcal{H}|_ U = \mathcal{G} by Modules, Lemma 17.11.3 the restriction \mathcal{K}|_ U is an \mathcal{O}_ U-module of finite type. Hence by Lemma 28.22.2 again we see that there exists a finite type quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-submodule \mathcal{K}' \subset \mathcal{K} such that \mathcal{K}'|_ U = \mathcal{K}|_ U. The solution to the problem posed in the lemma is to set
which is clearly of finite presentation and restricts to give \mathcal{G} on U with \varphi ' equal to the composition
This finishes the proof of the lemma. \square
Comments (0)