Lemma 32.4.13. In Situation 32.4.5 if $S$ is affine, then for some $i_0 \in I$ the schemes $S_ i$ for $i \geq i_0$ are affine.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 32.4.12 we may assume that $S_0$ is quasi-affine for some $0 \in I$. Set $R_0 = \Gamma (S_0, \mathcal{O}_{S_0})$. Then $S_0$ is a quasi-compact open of $T_0 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R_0)$. Denote $j_0 : S_0 \to T_0$ the corresponding quasi-compact open immersion. For $i \geq 0$ set $\mathcal{A}_ i = f_{i0, *}\mathcal{O}_{S_ i}$. Since $f_{i0}$ is affine we see that $S_ i = \underline{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}}_{S_0}(\mathcal{A}_ i)$. Set $T_ i = \underline{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}}_{T_0}(j_{0, *}\mathcal{A}_ i)$. Then $T_ i \to T_0$ is affine, hence $T_ i$ is affine. Thus $T_ i$ is the spectrum of

Write $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. We have $R = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i R_ i$ by Lemma 32.4.7. Hence also $S = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i T_ i$. As formation of the relative spectrum commutes with base change, the inverse image of the open $S_0 \subset T_0$ in $T_ i$ is $S_ i$. Let $Z_0 = T_0 \setminus S_0$ and let $Z_ i \subset T_ i$ be the inverse image of $Z_0$. As $S_ i = T_ i \setminus Z_ i$, it suffices to show that $Z_ i$ is empty for some $i$. Assume $Z_ i$ is nonempty for all $i$ to get a contradiction. By Lemma 32.4.8 there exists a point $s$ of $S = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits T_ i$ which maps to a point of $Z_ i$ for every $i$. But $S = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i S_ i$, and hence we arrive at a contradiction by Lemma 32.4.6. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (4)

Comment #4051 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

Comment #4052 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

Comment #4055 by Johan on

Comment #4135 by Johan on