Lemma 42.3.1. Let R be a Noetherian local ring. Let M be a finite R-module. Let x \in R. Assume that
\dim (\text{Supp}(M)) \leq 1, and
\dim (\text{Supp}(M/xM)) \leq 0.
Write \text{Supp}(M) = \{ \mathfrak m, \mathfrak q_1, \ldots , \mathfrak q_ t\} . Then
e_ R(M, 0, x) = \sum \nolimits _{i = 1, \ldots , t} \text{ord}_{R/\mathfrak q_ i}(x) \text{length}_{R_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(M_{\mathfrak q_ i}).
Proof.
We first make some preparatory remarks. The result of the lemma holds if M has finite length, i.e., if t = 0, because both the left hand side and the right hand side are zero in this case, see Lemma 42.2.4. Also, if we have a short exact sequence 0 \to M \to M' \to M'' \to 0 of modules satisfying (1) and (2), then lemma for 2 out of 3 of these implies the lemma for the third by the additivity of length (Algebra, Lemma 10.52.3) and additivty of multiplicities (Lemma 42.2.3).
Denote M_ i the image of M in M_{\mathfrak q_ i}, so \text{Supp}(M_ i) = \{ \mathfrak m, \mathfrak q_ i\} . The kernel and cokernel of the map M \to \bigoplus M_ i have support \{ \mathfrak m\} and hence have finite length. By our preparatory remarks, it follows that it suffices to prove the lemma for each M_ i. Thus we may assume that \text{Supp}(M) = \{ \mathfrak m, \mathfrak q\} . In this case we have a finite filtration M \supset \mathfrak qM \supset \mathfrak q^2M \supset \ldots \supset \mathfrak q^ nM = 0 by Algebra, Lemma 10.62.4. Again additivity shows that it suffices to prove the lemma in the case M is annihilated by \mathfrak q. In this case we can view M as a R/\mathfrak q-module, i.e., we may assume that R is a Noetherian local domain of dimension 1 with fraction field K. Dividing by the torsion submodule, i.e., by the kernel of M \to M \otimes _ R K = V (the torsion has finite length hence is handled by our preliminary remarks) we may assume that M \subset V is a lattice (Algebra, Definition 10.121.3). Then x : M \to M is injective and \text{length}_ R(M/xM) = d(M, xM) (Algebra, Definition 10.121.5). Since \text{length}_ K(V) = \dim _ K(V) we see that \det (x : V \to V) = x^{\dim _ K(V)} and \text{ord}_ R(\det (x : V \to V)) = \dim _ K(V) \text{ord}_ R(x). Thus the desired equality follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.121.7 in this case.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #4979 by Kazuki Masugi on
Comment #5226 by Johan on
There are also: