42.12 Proper pushforward
Definition 42.12.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X, Y be locally of finite type over S. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism. Assume f is proper.
Let Z \subset X be an integral closed subscheme with \dim _\delta (Z) = k. We define
f_*[Z] = \left\{ \begin{matrix} 0
& \text{if}
& \dim _\delta (f(Z))< k,
\\ \deg (Z/f(Z)) [f(Z)]
& \text{if}
& \dim _\delta (f(Z)) = k.
\end{matrix} \right.
Here we think of f(Z) \subset Y as an integral closed subscheme. The degree of Z over f(Z) is finite if \dim _\delta (f(Z)) = \dim _\delta (Z) by Lemma 42.11.1.
Let \alpha = \sum n_ Z [Z] be a k-cycle on X. The pushforward of \alpha as the sum
f_* \alpha = \sum n_ Z f_*[Z]
where each f_*[Z] is defined as above. The sum is locally finite by Lemma 42.11.2 above.
By definition the proper pushforward of cycles
f_* : Z_ k(X) \longrightarrow Z_ k(Y)
is a homomorphism of abelian groups. It turns X \mapsto Z_ k(X) into a covariant functor on the category of schemes locally of finite type over S with morphisms equal to proper morphisms.
Lemma 42.12.2. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X, Y, and Z be locally of finite type over S. Let f : X \to Y and g : Y \to Z be proper morphisms. Then g_* \circ f_* = (g \circ f)_* as maps Z_ k(X) \to Z_ k(Z).
Proof.
Let W \subset X be an integral closed subscheme of dimension k. Consider W' = f(W) \subset Y and W'' = g(f(W)) \subset Z. Since f, g are proper we see that W' (resp. W'') is an integral closed subscheme of Y (resp. Z). We have to show that g_*(f_*[W]) = (g \circ f)_*[W]. If \dim _\delta (W'') < k, then both sides are zero. If \dim _\delta (W'') = k, then we see the induced morphisms
W \longrightarrow W' \longrightarrow W''
both satisfy the hypotheses of Lemma 42.11.1. Hence
g_*(f_*[W]) = \deg (W/W')\deg (W'/W'')[W''], \quad (g \circ f)_*[W] = \deg (W/W'')[W''].
Then we can apply Morphisms, Lemma 29.51.9 to conclude.
\square
A closed immersion is proper. If i : Z \to X is a closed immersion then the maps
i_* : Z_ k(Z) \longrightarrow Z_ k(X)
are all injective.
Lemma 42.12.3. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be locally of finite type over S. Let X_1, X_2 \subset X be closed subschemes such that X = X_1 \cup X_2 set theoretically. For every k \in \mathbf{Z} the sequence of abelian groups
\xymatrix{ Z_ k(X_1 \cap X_2) \ar[r] & Z_ k(X_1) \oplus Z_ k(X_2) \ar[r] & Z_ k(X) \ar[r] & 0 }
is exact. Here X_1 \cap X_2 is the scheme theoretic intersection and the maps are the pushforward maps with one multiplied by -1.
Proof.
First assume X is quasi-compact. Then Z_ k(X) is a free \mathbf{Z}-module with basis given by the elements [Z] where Z \subset X is integral closed of \delta -dimension k. The groups Z_ k(X_1), Z_ k(X_2), Z_ k(X_1 \cap X_2) are free on the subset of these Z such that Z \subset X_1, Z \subset X_2, Z \subset X_1 \cap X_2. This immediately proves the lemma in this case. The general case is similar and the proof is omitted.
\square
Lemma 42.12.4. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let f : X \to Y be a proper morphism of schemes which are locally of finite type over S.
Let Z \subset X be a closed subscheme with \dim _\delta (Z) \leq k. Then
f_*[Z]_ k = [f_*{\mathcal O}_ Z]_ k.
Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on X such that \dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})) \leq k. Then
f_*[\mathcal{F}]_ k = [f_*{\mathcal F}]_ k.
Note that the statement makes sense since f_*\mathcal{F} and f_*\mathcal{O}_ Z are coherent \mathcal{O}_ Y-modules by Cohomology of Schemes, Proposition 30.19.1.
Proof.
Part (1) follows from (2) and Lemma 42.10.3. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on X. Assume that \dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})) \leq k. By Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.9.7 there exists a closed subscheme i : Z \to X and a coherent \mathcal{O}_ Z-module \mathcal{G} such that i_*\mathcal{G} \cong \mathcal{F} and such that the support of \mathcal{F} is Z. Let Z' \subset Y be the scheme theoretic image of f|_ Z : Z \to Y. Consider the commutative diagram of schemes
\xymatrix{ Z \ar[r]_ i \ar[d]_{f|_ Z} & X \ar[d]^ f \\ Z' \ar[r]^{i'} & Y }
We have f_*\mathcal{F} = f_*i_*\mathcal{G} = i'_*(f|_ Z)_*\mathcal{G} by going around the diagram in two ways. Suppose we know the result holds for closed immersions and for f|_ Z. Then we see that
f_*[\mathcal{F}]_ k = f_*i_*[\mathcal{G}]_ k = (i')_*(f|_ Z)_*[\mathcal{G}]_ k = (i')_*[(f|_ Z)_*\mathcal{G}]_ k = [(i')_*(f|_ Z)_*\mathcal{G}]_ k = [f_*\mathcal{F}]_ k
as desired. The case of a closed immersion is straightforward (omitted). Note that f|_ Z : Z \to Z' is a dominant morphism (see Morphisms, Lemma 29.6.3). Thus we have reduced to the case where \dim _\delta (X) \leq k and f : X \to Y is proper and dominant.
Assume \dim _\delta (X) \leq k and f : X \to Y is proper and dominant. Since f is dominant, for every irreducible component Z \subset Y with generic point \eta there exists a point \xi \in X such that f(\xi ) = \eta . Hence \delta (\eta ) \leq \delta (\xi ) \leq k. Thus we see that in the expressions
f_*[\mathcal{F}]_ k = \sum n_ Z[Z], \quad \text{and} \quad [f_*\mathcal{F}]_ k = \sum m_ Z[Z].
whenever n_ Z \not= 0, or m_ Z \not= 0 the integral closed subscheme Z is actually an irreducible component of Y of \delta -dimension k. Pick such an integral closed subscheme Z \subset Y and denote \eta its generic point. Note that for any \xi \in X with f(\xi ) = \eta we have \delta (\xi ) \geq k and hence \xi is a generic point of an irreducible component of X of \delta -dimension k as well (see Lemma 42.9.1). Since f is quasi-compact and X is locally Noetherian, there can be only finitely many of these and hence f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) is finite. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.51.1 there exists an open neighbourhood \eta \in V \subset Y such that f^{-1}(V) \to V is finite. Replacing Y by V and X by f^{-1}(V) we reduce to the case where Y is affine, and f is finite.
Write Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) and X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) (possible as a finite morphism is affine). Then R and A are Noetherian rings and A is finite over R. Moreover \mathcal{F} = \widetilde{M} for some finite A-module M. Note that f_*\mathcal{F} corresponds to M viewed as an R-module. Let \mathfrak p \subset R be the minimal prime corresponding to \eta \in Y. The coefficient of Z in [f_*\mathcal{F}]_ k is clearly \text{length}_{R_{\mathfrak p}}(M_{\mathfrak p}). Let \mathfrak q_ i, i = 1, \ldots , t be the primes of A lying over \mathfrak p. Then A_{\mathfrak p} = \prod A_{\mathfrak q_ i} since A_{\mathfrak p} is an Artinian ring being finite over the dimension zero local Noetherian ring R_{\mathfrak p}. Clearly the coefficient of Z in f_*[\mathcal{F}]_ k is
\sum \nolimits _{i = 1, \ldots , t} [\kappa (\mathfrak q_ i) : \kappa (\mathfrak p)] \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(M_{\mathfrak q_ i})
Hence the desired equality follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.52.12.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #5089 by Klaus Mattis on
Comment #5299 by Johan on