Lemma 8.2.1. This actually does give a presheaf.

## 8.2 Presheaves of morphisms associated to fibred categories

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category. Let $p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C}$ be a fibred category, see Categories, Section 4.33. Suppose that $x, y\in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{S}_ U)$ are objects in the fibre category over $U$. We are going to define a functor

In other words this will be a presheaf on $\mathcal{C}/U$, see Sites, Definition 7.2.2. Make a choice of pullbacks as in Categories, Definition 4.33.6. Then, for $f : V \to U$ we set

Let $f' : V' \to U$ be a second object of $\mathcal{C}/U$. We also have to define the restriction map corresponding to a morphism $g : V'/U \to V/U$ in $\mathcal{C}/U$, in other words $g : V' \to V$ and $f' = f \circ g$. This will be a map

This map will basically be $g^\ast $, except that this transforms an element $\phi $ of the left hand side into an element $g^\ast \phi $ of $\mathop{Mor}\nolimits _{\mathcal{S}_{V'}}(g^\ast f^\ast x, g^\ast f^\ast y)$. At this point we use the transformation $\alpha _{g, f}$ of Categories, Lemma 4.33.7. In a formula, the restriction map is described by

Of course, nobody thinks of this restriction map in this way. We will only do this once in order to verify the following lemma.

**Proof.**
Let $g : V'/U \to V/U$ be as above and similarly $g' : V''/U \to V'/U$ be morphisms in $\mathcal{C}/U$. So $f' = f \circ g$ and $f'' = f' \circ g' = f \circ g \circ g'$. Let $\phi \in \mathop{Mor}\nolimits _{\mathcal{S}_ V}(f^\ast x, f^\ast y)$. Then we have

which is what we want, namely $\phi |_{V''} = (\phi |_{V'})|_{V''}$. The first equality holds because $\alpha _{g', g}$ is a transformation of functors, and hence

commutes. The second equality holds because of property (d) of a pseudo functor since $f' = f \circ g$ (see Categories, Definition 4.29.5). The last equality follows from the fact that $(g')^*$ is a functor. $\square$

From now on we often omit mentioning the transformations $\alpha _{g, f}$ and we simply identify the functors $g^* \circ f^*$ and $(f \circ g)^*$. In particular, given $g : V'/U \to V/U$ the restriction mappings for the presheaf $\mathit{Mor}(x, y)$ will sometimes be denoted $\phi \mapsto g^*\phi $. We formalize the construction in a definition.

Definition 8.2.2. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category. Let $p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C}$ be a fibred category, see Categories, Section 4.33. Given an object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ and objects $x$, $y$ of the fibre category, the *presheaf of morphisms from $x$ to $y$* is the presheaf

described above. It is denoted $\mathit{Mor}(x, y)$. The subpresheaf $\mathit{Isom}(x, y)$ whose values over $V$ is the set of isomorphisms $f^*x \to f^*y$ in the fibre category $\mathcal{S}_ V$ is called the *presheaf of isomorphisms from $x$ to $y$*.

If $\mathcal{S}$ is fibred in groupoids then of course $\mathit{Isom}(x, y) = \mathit{Mor}(x, y)$, and it is customary to use the $\mathit{Isom}$ notation.

Lemma 8.2.3. Let $F : \mathcal{S}_1 \to \mathcal{S}_2$ be a $1$-morphism of fibred categories over the category $\mathcal{C}$. Let $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$ and $x, y\in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathcal{S}_1)_ U)$. Then $F$ defines a canonical morphism of presheaves

on $\mathcal{C}/U$.

**Proof.**
By Categories, Definition 4.33.9 the functor $F$ maps strongly cartesian morphisms to strongly cartesian morphisms. Hence if $f : V \to U$ is a morphism in $\mathcal{C}$, then there are canonical isomorphisms $\alpha _ V : f^*F(x) \to F(f^*x)$, $\beta _ V : f^*F(y) \to F(f^*y)$ such that $f^*F(x) \to F(f^*x) \to F(x)$ is the canonical morphism $f^*F(x) \to F(x)$, and similarly for $\beta _ V$. Thus we may define

by $\phi \mapsto \beta _ V^{-1} \circ F(\phi ) \circ \alpha _ V$. We omit the verification that this is compatible with the restriction mappings. $\square$

Remark 8.2.4. Suppose that $p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C}$ is fibred in groupoids. In this case we can prove Lemma 8.2.1 using Categories, Lemma 4.36.4 which says that $\mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C}$ is equivalent to the category associated to a contravariant functor $F : \mathcal{C} \to \textit{Groupoids}$. In the case of the fibred category associated to $F$ we have $g^* \circ f^* = (f \circ g)^*$ on the nose and there is no need to use the maps $\alpha _{g, f}$. In this case the lemma is (even more) trivial. Of course then one uses that the $\mathit{Mor}(x, y)$ presheaf is unchanged when passing to an equivalent fibred category which follows from Lemma 8.2.3.

Lemma 8.2.5. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category. Let $p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C}$ be a fibred category, see Categories, Section 4.33. Let $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$ and let $x, y \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{S}_ U)$. Denote $x, y : \mathcal{C}/U \to \mathcal{S}$ also the corresponding $1$-morphisms, see Categories, Lemma 4.41.1. Then

the $2$-fibre product $\mathcal{S} \times _{\mathcal{S} \times \mathcal{S}, (x, y)} \mathcal{C}/U$ is fibred in setoids over $\mathcal{C}/U$, and

$\mathit{Isom}(x, y)$ is the presheaf of sets corresponding to this category fibred in setoids, see Categories, Lemma 4.39.6.

**Proof.**
Omitted. Hint: Objects of the $2$-fibre product are $(a : V \to U, z, a : V \to U, (\alpha , \beta ))$ where $\alpha : z \to a^*x$ and $\beta : z \to a^*y$ are isomorphisms in $\mathcal{S}_ V$. Thus the relationship with $\mathit{Isom}(x, y)$ comes by assigning to such an object the isomorphism $\beta \circ \alpha ^{-1}$.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (4)

Comment #3994 by Praphulla Koushik on

Comment #3995 by Praphulla Koushik on

Comment #3996 by Praphulla Koushik on

Comment #4114 by Johan on