Definition 65.40.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. We say $f$ is *proper* if $f$ is separated, finite type, and universally closed.

## 65.40 Proper morphisms

The notion of a proper morphism plays an important role in algebraic geometry. Here is the definition of a proper morphism of algebraic spaces.

Lemma 65.40.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. The following are equivalent

$f$ is proper,

for every scheme $Z$ and every morphism $Z \to Y$ the projection $Z \times _ Y X \to Z$ is proper,

for every affine scheme $Z$ and every morphism $Z \to Y$ the projection $Z \times _ Y X \to Z$ is proper,

there exists a scheme $V$ and a surjective étale morphism $V \to Y$ such that $V \times _ Y X \to V$ is proper, and

there exists a Zariski covering $Y = \bigcup Y_ i$ such that each of the morphisms $f^{-1}(Y_ i) \to Y_ i$ is proper.

**Proof.**
Combine Lemmas 65.4.12, 65.23.4, 65.8.8, and 65.9.5.
$\square$

Lemma 65.40.3. A base change of a proper morphism is proper.

Lemma 65.40.4. A composition of proper morphisms is proper.

Lemma 65.40.5. A closed immersion of algebraic spaces is a proper morphism of algebraic spaces.

**Proof.**
As a closed immersion is by definition representable this follows from Spaces, Lemma 63.5.8 and the corresponding result for morphisms of schemes, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.6.
$\square$

Lemma 65.40.6. Let $S$ be a scheme. Consider a commutative diagram of algebraic spaces

over $S$.

If $X \to B$ is universally closed and $Y \to B$ is separated, then the morphism $X \to Y$ is universally closed. In particular, the image of $|X|$ in $|Y|$ is closed.

If $X \to B$ is proper and $Y \to B$ is separated, then the morphism $X \to Y$ is proper.

**Proof.**
Assume $X \to B$ is universally closed and $Y \to B$ is separated. We factor the morphism as $X \to X \times _ B Y \to Y$. The first morphism is a closed immersion, see Lemma 65.4.6 hence universally closed. The projection $X \times _ B Y \to Y$ is the base change of a universally closed morphism and hence universally closed, see Lemma 65.9.3. Thus $X \to Y$ is universally closed as the composition of universally closed morphisms, see Lemma 65.9.4. This proves (1). To deduce (2) combine (1) with Lemmas 65.4.10, 65.8.9, and 65.23.6.
$\square$

Lemma 65.40.7. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $B$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $B$. If $X$ is universally closed over $B$ and $f$ is surjective then $Y$ is universally closed over $B$. In particular, if also $Y$ is separated and of finite type over $B$, then $Y$ is proper over $B$.

**Proof.**
Assume $X$ is universally closed and $f$ surjective. Denote $p : X \to B$, $q : Y \to B$ the structure morphisms. Let $B' \to B$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. The base change $f' : X_{B'} \to Y_{B'}$ is surjective (Lemma 65.5.5), and the base change $p' : X_{B'} \to B'$ is closed. If $T \subset Y_{B'}$ is closed, then $(f')^{-1}(T) \subset X_{B'}$ is closed, hence $p'((f')^{-1}(T)) = q'(T)$ is closed. So $q'$ is closed.
$\square$

Lemma 65.40.8. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let

be a commutative diagram of morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. Assume

$X \to B$ is a proper morphism,

$Y \to B$ is separated and locally of finite type,

Then the scheme theoretic image $Z \subset Y$ of $h$ is proper over $B$ and $X \to Z$ is surjective.

**Proof.**
The scheme theoretic image of $h$ is constructed in Section 65.16. Observe that $h$ is quasi-compact (Lemma 65.8.10) hence $|h|(|X|) \subset |Z|$ is dense (Lemma 65.16.3). On the other hand $|h|(|X|)$ is closed in $|Y|$ (Lemma 65.40.6) hence $X \to Z$ is surjective. Thus $Z \to B$ is a proper (Lemma 65.40.7).
$\square$

Lemma 65.40.9. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. The following are equivalent:

$f$ is separated,

$\Delta _{X/Y} : X \to X \times _ Y X$ is universally closed, and

$\Delta _{X/Y} : X \to X \times _ Y X$ is proper.

**Proof.**
The implication (1) $\Rightarrow $ (3) follows from Lemma 65.40.5. We will use Spaces, Lemma 63.5.8 without further mention in the rest of the proof. Recall that $\Delta _{X/Y}$ is a representable monomorphism which is locally of finite type, see Lemma 65.4.1. Since proper $\Rightarrow $ universally closed for morphisms of schemes we conclude that (3) implies (2). If $\Delta _{X/Y}$ is universally closed then Étale Morphisms, Lemma 41.7.2 implies that it is a closed immersion. Thus (2) $\Rightarrow $ (1) and we win.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)