Lemma 66.14.1. Any locally Noetherian decent algebraic space is quasi-separated.

## 66.14 Decent spaces

In this section we collect some useful facts on decent spaces.

**Proof.**
Namely, let $X$ be an algebraic space (over some base scheme, for example over $\mathbf{Z}$) which is decent and locally Noetherian. Let $U \to X$ and $V \to X$ be étale morphisms with $U$ and $V$ affine schemes. We have to show that $W = U \times _ X V$ is quasi-compact (Properties of Spaces, Lemma 64.3.3). Since $X$ is locally Noetherian, the schemes $U$, $V$ are Noetherian and $W$ is locally Noetherian. Since $X$ is decent, the fibres of the morphism $W \to U$ are finite. Namely, we can represent any $x \in |X|$ by a quasi-compact monomorphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X$. Then $U_ k$ and $V_ k$ are finite disjoint unions of spectra of finite separable extensions of $k$ (Remark 66.4.1) and we see that $W_ k = U_ k \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)} V_ k$ is finite. Let $n$ be the maximum degree of a fibre of $W \to U$ at a generic point of an irreducible component of $U$. Consider the stratification

associated to $W \to U$ in More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.40.5. By our choice of $n$ above we conclude that $U_{n + 1}$ is empty. Hence we see that the fibres of $W \to U$ are universally bounded. Then we can apply More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.40.3 to find a stratification

by closed subsets such that with $S_ r = Z_ r \setminus Z_{r - 1}$ the morphism $W \times _ U S_ r \to S_ r$ is finite locally free. Since $U$ is Noetherian, the schemes $S_ r$ are Noetherian, whence the schemes $W \times _ U S_ r$ are Noetherian, whence $W = \coprod W \times _ U S_ r$ is quasi-compact as desired. $\square$

Lemma 66.14.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$.

If $|X|$ is a singleton then $X$ is a scheme.

If $|X|$ is a singleton and $X$ is reduced, then $X \cong \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ for some field $k$.

**Proof.**
Assume $|X|$ is a singleton. It follows immediately from Theorem 66.10.2 that $X$ is a scheme, but we can also argue directly as follows. Choose an affine scheme $U$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to X$. Set $R = U \times _ X U$. Then $U$ and $R$ have finitely many points by Lemma 66.4.5 (and the definition of a decent space). All of these points are closed in $U$ and $R$ by Lemma 66.12.1. It follows that $U$ and $R$ are affine schemes. We may shrink $U$ to a singleton space. Then $U$ is the spectrum of a henselian local ring, see Algebra, Lemma 10.152.10. The projections $R \to U$ are étale, hence finite étale because $U$ is the spectrum of a $0$-dimensional henselian local ring, see Algebra, Lemma 10.152.3. It follows that $X$ is a scheme by Groupoids, Proposition 39.23.9.

Part (2) follows from (1) and the fact that a reduced singleton scheme is the spectrum of a field. $\square$

Remark 66.14.3. We will see in Limits of Spaces, Lemma 68.15.3 that an algebraic space whose reduction is a scheme is a scheme.

Lemma 66.14.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$. Consider a commutative diagram

Assume that the image point $s \in S$ of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to S$ is a closed point and that $\kappa (s) \subset k$ is algebraic. Then the image $x$ of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X$ is a closed point of $|X|$.

**Proof.**
Suppose that $x \leadsto x'$ for some $x' \in |X|$. Choose an étale morphism $U \to X$ where $U$ is a scheme and a point $u' \in U'$ mapping to $x'$. Choose a specialization $u \leadsto u'$ in $U$ with $u$ mapping to $x$ in $X$, see Lemma 66.12.2. Then $u$ is the image of a point $w$ of the scheme $W = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \times _ X U$. Since the projection $W \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ is étale we see that $\kappa (w) \supset k$ is finite. Hence $\kappa (w) \supset \kappa (s)$ is algebraic. Hence $\kappa (u) \supset \kappa (s)$ is algebraic. Thus $u$ is a closed point of $U$ by Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.2. Thus $u = u'$, whence $x = x'$.
$\square$

Lemma 66.14.5. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$. Consider a commutative diagram

Assume that the image point $s \in S$ of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to S$ is a closed point and that $\kappa (s) \subset k$ is finite. Then $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X$ is finite morphism. If $\kappa (s) = k$ then $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X$ is closed immersion.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 66.14.4 the image point $x \in |X|$ is closed. Let $Z \subset X$ be the reduced closed subspace with $|Z| = \{ x\} $ (Properties of Spaces, Lemma 64.12.3). Note that $Z$ is a decent algebraic space by Lemma 66.6.5. By Lemma 66.14.2 we see that $Z = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k')$ for some field $k'$. Of course $k \supset k' \supset \kappa (s)$. Then $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to Z$ is a finite morphism of schemes and $Z \to X$ is a finite morphism as it is a closed immersion. Hence $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X$ is finite (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 65.45.4). If $k = \kappa (s)$, then $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) = Z$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X$ is a closed immersion.
$\square$

Lemma 66.14.6. Let $S$ be a scheme. Suppose $X$ is a decent algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$ be a closed point. Then $x$ can be represented by a closed immersion $i : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X$ from the spectrum of a field.

**Proof.**
We know that $x$ can be represented by a quasi-compact monomorphism $i : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X$ where $k$ is a field (Definition 66.6.1). Let $U \to X$ be an étale morphism where $U$ is an affine scheme. As $x$ is closed and $X$ decent, the fibre $F$ of $|U| \to |X|$ over $x$ consists of closed points (Lemma 66.12.1). As $i$ is a monomorphism, so is $U_ k = U \times _ X \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to U$. In particular, the map $|U_ k| \to F$ is injective. Since $U_ k$ is quasi-compact and étale over a field, we see that $U_ k$ is a finite disjoint union of spectra of fields (Remark 66.4.1). Say $U_ k = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k_1) \amalg \ldots \amalg \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k_ r)$. Since $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k_ i) \to U$ is a monomorphism, we see that its image $u_ i$ has residue field $\kappa (u_ i) = k_ i$. Since $u_ i \in F$ is a closed point we conclude the morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k_ i) \to U$ is a closed immersion. As the $u_ i$ are pairwise distinct, $U_ k \to U$ is a closed immersion. Hence $i$ is a closed immersion (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 65.12.1). This finishes the proof.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)