59.49 Exactness of big lower shriek
This is just the following technical result. Note that the functor f_{big!} has nothing whatsoever to do with cohomology with compact support in general.
Lemma 59.49.1. Let \tau \in \{ Zariski, {\acute{e}tale}, smooth, syntomic, fppf\} . Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes. Let
f_{big} : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau ) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/Y)_\tau )
be the corresponding morphism of topoi as in Topologies, Lemma 34.3.16, 34.4.16, 34.5.10, 34.6.10, or 34.7.12.
The functor f_{big}^{-1} : \textit{Ab}((\mathit{Sch}/Y)_\tau ) \to \textit{Ab}((\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau ) has a left adjoint
f_{big!} : \textit{Ab}((\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau ) \to \textit{Ab}((\mathit{Sch}/Y)_\tau )
which is exact.
The functor f_{big}^* : \textit{Mod}((\mathit{Sch}/Y)_\tau , \mathcal{O}) \to \textit{Mod}((\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau , \mathcal{O}) has a left adjoint
f_{big!} : \textit{Mod}((\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau , \mathcal{O}) \to \textit{Mod}((\mathit{Sch}/Y)_\tau , \mathcal{O})
which is exact.
Moreover, the two functors f_{big!} agree on underlying sheaves of abelian groups.
Proof.
Recall that f_{big} is the morphism of topoi associated to the continuous and cocontinuous functor u : (\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau \to (\mathit{Sch}/Y)_\tau , U/X \mapsto U/Y. Moreover, we have f_{big}^{-1}\mathcal{O} = \mathcal{O}. Hence the existence of f_{big!} follows from Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.16.2, respectively Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.41.1. Note that if U is an object of (\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau then the functor u induces an equivalence of categories
u' : (\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau /U \longrightarrow (\mathit{Sch}/Y)_\tau /U
because both sides of the arrow are equal to (\mathit{Sch}/U)_\tau . Hence the agreement of f_{big!} on underlying abelian sheaves follows from the discussion in Modules on Sites, Remark 18.41.2. The exactness of f_{big!} follows from Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.16.3 as the functor u above which commutes with fibre products and equalizers.
\square
Next, we prove a technical lemma that will be useful later when comparing sheaves of modules on different sites associated to algebraic stacks.
Lemma 59.49.2. Let X be a scheme. Let \tau \in \{ Zariski, {\acute{e}tale}, smooth, syntomic, fppf\} . Let \mathcal{C}_1 \subset \mathcal{C}_2 \subset (\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau be full subcategories with the following properties:
For an object U/X of \mathcal{C}_ t,
if \{ U_ i \to U\} is a covering of (\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau , then U_ i/X is an object of \mathcal{C}_ t,
U \times \mathbf{A}^1/X is an object of \mathcal{C}_ t.
X/X is an object of \mathcal{C}_ t.
We endow \mathcal{C}_ t with the structure of a site whose coverings are exactly those coverings \{ U_ i \to U\} of (\mathit{Sch}/X)_\tau with U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_ t). Then
The functor \mathcal{C}_1 \to \mathcal{C}_2 is fully faithful, continuous, and cocontinuous.
Denote g : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_1) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_2) the corresponding morphism of topoi. Denote \mathcal{O}_ t the restriction of \mathcal{O} to \mathcal{C}_ t. Denote g_! the functor of Modules on Sites, Definition 18.16.1.
The canonical map g_!\mathcal{O}_1 \to \mathcal{O}_2 is an isomorphism.
Proof.
Assertion (a) is immediate from the definitions. In this proof all schemes are schemes over X and all morphisms of schemes are morphisms of schemes over X. Note that g^{-1} is given by restriction, so that for an object U of \mathcal{C}_1 we have \mathcal{O}_1(U) = \mathcal{O}_2(U) = \mathcal{O}(U). Recall that g_!\mathcal{O}_1 is the sheaf associated to the presheaf g_{p!}\mathcal{O}_1 which associates to V in \mathcal{C}_2 the group
\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{V \to U} \mathcal{O}(U)
where U runs over the objects of \mathcal{C}_1 and the colimit is taken in the category of abelian groups. Below we will use frequently that if
V \to U \to U'
are morphisms with U, U' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_1) and if f' \in \mathcal{O}(U') restricts to f \in \mathcal{O}(U), then (V \to U, f) and (V \to U', f') define the same element of the colimit. Also, g_!\mathcal{O}_1 \to \mathcal{O}_2 maps the element (V \to U, f) simply to the pullback of f to V.
Surjectivity. Let V be a scheme and let h \in \mathcal{O}(V). Then we obtain a morphism V \to X \times \mathbf{A}^1 induced by h and the structure morphism V \to X. Writing \mathbf{A}^1 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}[x]) we see the element x \in \mathcal{O}(X \times \mathbf{A}^1) pulls back to h. Since X \times \mathbf{A}^1 is an object of \mathcal{C}_1 by assumptions (1)(b) and (2) we obtain the desired surjectivity.
Injectivity. Let V be a scheme. Let s = \sum _{i = 1, \ldots , n} (V \to U_ i, f_ i) be an element of the colimit displayed above. For any i we can use the morphism f_ i : U_ i \to X \times \mathbf{A}^1 to see that (V \to U_ i, f_ i) defines the same element of the colimit as (f_ i : V \to X \times \mathbf{A}^1, x). Then we can consider
f_1 \times \ldots \times f_ n : V \to X \times \mathbf{A}^ n
and we see that s is equivalent in the colimit to
\sum \nolimits _{i = 1, \ldots , n} (f_1 \times \ldots \times f_ n : V \to X \times \mathbf{A}^ n, x_ i) = (f_1 \times \ldots \times f_ n : V \to X \times \mathbf{A}^ n, x_1 + \ldots + x_ n)
Now, if x_1 + \ldots + x_ n restricts to zero on V, then we see that f_1 \times \ldots \times f_ n factors through X \times \mathbf{A}^{n - 1} = V(x_1 + \ldots + x_ n). Hence we see that s is equivalent to zero in the colimit.
\square
Comments (0)