Definition 35.21.1. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a property of germs of schemes. We say that $\mathcal{P}$ is *étale local* (resp. *smooth local*) if for any étale (resp. smooth) morphism of germs $(U', u') \to (U, u)$ we have $\mathcal{P}(U, u) \Leftrightarrow \mathcal{P}(U', u')$.

## 35.21 Local properties of germs

Let $(X, x)$ be a germ of a scheme. The dimension of $X$ at $x$ is the minimum of the dimensions of open neighbourhoods of $x$ in $X$, and any small enough open neighbourhood has this dimension. Hence this is an invariant of the isomorphism class of the germ. We denote this simply $\dim _ x(X)$. The following lemma tells us that the assertion $\dim _ x(X) = d$ is an étale local property of germs.

Lemma 35.21.2. Let $f : U \to V$ be an étale morphism of schemes. Let $u \in U$ and $v = f(u)$. Then $\dim _ u(U) = \dim _ v(V)$.

**Proof.**
In the statement $\dim _ u(U)$ is the dimension of $U$ at $u$ as defined in Topology, Definition 5.10.1 as the minimum of the Krull dimensions of open neighbourhoods of $u$ in $U$. Similarly for $\dim _ v(V)$.

Let us show that $\dim _ v(V) \geq \dim _ u(U)$. Let $V'$ be an open neighbourhood of $v$ in $V$. Then there exists an open neighbourhood $U'$ of $u$ in $U$ contained in $f^{-1}(V')$ such that $\dim _ u(U) = \dim (U')$. Suppose that $Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset \ldots \subset Z_ n$ is a chain of irreducible closed subschemes of $U'$. If $\xi _ i \in Z_ i$ is the generic point then we have specializations $\xi _ n \leadsto \xi _{n - 1} \leadsto \ldots \leadsto \xi _0$. This gives specializations $f(\xi _ n) \leadsto f(\xi _{n - 1}) \leadsto \ldots \leadsto f(\xi _0)$ in $V'$. Note that $f(\xi _ j) \not= f(\xi _ i)$ if $i \not= j$ as the fibres of $f$ are discrete (see Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.7). Hence we see that $\dim (V') \geq n$. The inequality $\dim _ v(V) \geq \dim _ u(U)$ follows formally.

Let us show that $\dim _ u(U) \geq \dim _ v(V)$. Let $U'$ be an open neighbourhood of $u$ in $U$. Note that $V' = f(U')$ is an open neighbourhood of $v$ by Morphisms, Lemma 29.25.10. Hence $\dim (V') \geq \dim _ v(V)$. Pick a chain $Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset \ldots \subset Z_ n$ of irreducible closed subschemes of $V'$. Let $\xi _ i \in Z_ i$ be the generic point, so we have specializations $\xi _ n \leadsto \xi _{n - 1} \leadsto \ldots \leadsto \xi _0$. Since $\xi _0 \in f(U')$ we can find a point $\eta _0 \in U'$ with $f(\eta _0) = \xi _0$. Consider the map of local rings

which is a flat local ring map by Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.12. Note that the points $\xi _ i$ correspond to primes of the ring on the left by Schemes, Lemma 26.13.2. Hence by going down (see Algebra, Section 10.41) for the displayed ring map we can find a sequence of specializations $\eta _ n \leadsto \eta _{n - 1} \leadsto \ldots \leadsto \eta _0$ in $U'$ mapping to the sequence $\xi _ n \leadsto \xi _{n - 1} \leadsto \ldots \leadsto \xi _0$ under $f$. This implies that $\dim _ u(U) \geq \dim _ v(V)$. $\square$

Let $(X, x)$ be a germ of a scheme. The isomorphism class of the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is an invariant of the germ. The following lemma says that the property $\dim (\mathcal{O}_{X, x}) = d$ is an étale local property of germs.

Lemma 35.21.3. Let $f : U \to V$ be an étale morphism of schemes. Let $u \in U$ and $v = f(u)$. Then $\dim (\mathcal{O}_{U, u}) = \dim (\mathcal{O}_{V, v})$.

**Proof.**
The algebraic statement we are asked to prove is the following: If $A \to B$ is an étale ring map and $\mathfrak q$ is a prime of $B$ lying over $\mathfrak p \subset A$, then $\dim (A_{\mathfrak p}) = \dim (B_{\mathfrak q})$. This is More on Algebra, Lemma 15.44.2.
$\square$

Let $(X, x)$ be a germ of a scheme. The isomorphism class of the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is an invariant of the germ. The following lemma says that the property “$\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is regular” is an étale local property of germs.

Lemma 35.21.4. Let $f : U \to V$ be an étale morphism of schemes. Let $u \in U$ and $v = f(u)$. Then $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ is a regular local ring if and only if $\mathcal{O}_{V, v}$ is a regular local ring.

**Proof.**
The algebraic statement we are asked to prove is the following: If $A \to B$ is an étale ring map and $\mathfrak q$ is a prime of $B$ lying over $\mathfrak p \subset A$, then $A_{\mathfrak p}$ is regular if and only if $B_{\mathfrak q}$ is regular. This is More on Algebra, Lemma 15.44.3.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)