Lemma 8.12.1. In the situation above, if \mathcal{S} is a fibred category over \mathcal{D} then u^ p\mathcal{S} is a fibred category over \mathcal{C}.
8.12 Functoriality for stacks
In this section we study what happens if we want to change the base site of a stack. This section can be skipped on a first reading.
Let u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} be a functor between categories. Let p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{D} be a category over \mathcal{D}. In this situation we denote u^ p\mathcal{S} the category over \mathcal{C} defined as follows
An object of u^ p\mathcal{S} is a pair (U, y) consisting of an object U of \mathcal{C} and an object y of \mathcal{S}_{u(U)}.
A morphism (a, \beta ) : (U, y) \to (U', y') is given by a morphism a : U \to U' of \mathcal{C} and a morphism \beta : y \to y' of \mathcal{S} such that p(\beta ) = u(a).
Note that with these definitions the fibre category of u^ p\mathcal{S} over U is equal to the fibre category of \mathcal{S} over u(U).
Proof. Please take a look at the discussion surrounding Categories, Definitions 4.33.1 and 4.33.5 before reading this proof. Let (a, \beta ) : (U, y) \to (U', y') be a morphism of u^ p\mathcal{S}. We claim that (a, \beta ) is strongly cartesian if and only if \beta is strongly cartesian. First, assume \beta is strongly cartesian. Consider any second morphism (a_1, \beta _1) : (U_1, y_1) \to (U', y') of u^ p\mathcal{S}. Then
the second equality as \beta is strongly cartesian. Hence we see that indeed (a, \beta ) is strongly cartesian. Conversely, suppose that (a, \beta ) is strongly cartesian. Choose a strongly cartesian morphism \beta ' : y'' \to y' in \mathcal{S} with p(\beta ') = u(a). Then bot (a, \beta ) : (U, y) \to (U, y') and (a, \beta ') : (U, y'') \to (U, y) are strongly cartesian and lift a. Hence, by the uniqueness of strongly cartesian morphisms (see discussion in Categories, Section 4.33) there exists an isomorphism \iota : y \to y'' in \mathcal{S}_{u(U)} such that \beta = \beta ' \circ \iota , which implies that \beta is strongly cartesian in \mathcal{S} by Categories, Lemma 4.33.2.
Finally, we have to show that given (U', y') and U \to U' we can find a strongly cartesian morphism (U, y) \to (U', y') in u^ p\mathcal{S} lifting the morphism U \to U'. This follows from the above as by assumption we can find a strongly cartesian morphism y \to y' lifting the morphism u(U) \to u(U'). \square
Lemma 8.12.2. Let u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} be a continuous functor of sites. Let p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{D} be a stack over \mathcal{D}. Then u^ p\mathcal{S} is a stack over \mathcal{C}.
Proof. We have seen in Lemma 8.12.1 that u^ p\mathcal{S} is a fibred category over \mathcal{C}. Moreover, in the proof of that lemma we have seen that a morphism (a, \beta ) of u^ p\mathcal{S} is strongly cartesian if and only \beta is strongly cartesian in \mathcal{S}. Hence, given a morphism a : U \to U' of \mathcal{C}, not only do we have the equalities (u^ p\mathcal{S})_ U = \mathcal{S}_ U and (u^ p\mathcal{S})_{U'} = \mathcal{S}_{U'}, but via these equalities the pullback functors agree; in a formula a^*(U', y') = (U, u(a)^*y').
Having said this, let \mathcal{U} = \{ U_ i \to U\} be a covering of \mathcal{C}. As u is continuous we see that \mathcal{V} = \{ u(U_ i) \to u(U)\} is a covering of \mathcal{D}, and that u(U_ i \times _ U U_ j) = u(U_ i) \times _{u(U)} u(U_ j) and similarly for the triple fibre products U_ i \times _ U U_ j \times _ U U_ k. As we have the identifications of fibre categories and pullbacks we see that descend data relative to \mathcal{U} are identical to descend data relative to \mathcal{V}. Since by assumption we have effective descent in \mathcal{S} we conclude the same holds for u^ p\mathcal{S}. \square
Lemma 8.12.3. Let u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} be a continuous functor of sites. Let p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{D} be a stack in groupoids over \mathcal{D}. Then u^ p\mathcal{S} is a stack in groupoids over \mathcal{C}.
Proof. This follows immediately from Lemma 8.12.2 and the fact that all fibre categories are groupoids. \square
Definition 8.12.4. Let f : \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{C} be a morphism of sites given by the continuous functor u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}. Let \mathcal{S} be a fibred category over \mathcal{D}. In this setting we write f_*\mathcal{S} for the fibred category u^ p\mathcal{S} defined above. We say that f_*\mathcal{S} is the pushforward of \mathcal{S} along f.
By the results above we know that f_*\mathcal{S} is a stack (in groupoids) if \mathcal{S} is a stack (in groupoids). It is harder to define the pullback of a stack (and we'll need additional assumptions for our particular construction – feel free to write up and submit a more general construction). We do this in several steps.
Let u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} be a functor between categories. Let p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C} be a category over \mathcal{C}. In this setting we define a category u_{pp}\mathcal{S} as follows:
An object of u_{pp}\mathcal{S} is a triple (U, \phi : V \to u(U), x) where U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), the map \phi : V \to u(U) is a morphism in \mathcal{D}, and x \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{S}_ U).
A morphism
(U_1, \phi _1 : V_1 \to u(U_1), x_1) \longrightarrow (U_2, \phi _2 : V_2 \to u(U_2), x_2)of u_{pp}\mathcal{S} is given by a (a, b, \alpha ) where a : U_1 \to U_2 is a morphism of \mathcal{C}, b : V_1 \to V_2 is a morphism of \mathcal{D}, and \alpha : x_1 \to x_2 is morphism of \mathcal{S}, such that p(\alpha ) = a and the diagram
\xymatrix{ V_1 \ar[d]_{\phi _1} \ar[r]_ b & V_2 \ar[d]^{\phi _2} \\ u(U_1) \ar[r]^{u(a)} & u(U_2) }commutes in \mathcal{D}.
We think of u_{pp}\mathcal{S} as a category over \mathcal{D} via
The fibre category of u_{pp}\mathcal{S} over an object V of \mathcal{D} does not have a simple description.
Lemma 8.12.5. In the situation above assume
p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C} is a fibred category,
\mathcal{C} has nonempty finite limits, and
u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} commutes with nonempty finite limits.
Consider the set R \subset \text{Arrows}(u_{pp}\mathcal{S}) of morphisms of the form
with \alpha strongly cartesian. Then R is a right multiplicative system.
Proof. According to Categories, Definition 4.27.1 we have to check RMS1, RMS2, RMS3. Condition RMS1 holds as a composition of strongly cartesian morphisms is strongly cartesian, see Categories, Lemma 4.33.2.
To check RMS2 suppose we have a morphism
of u_{pp}\mathcal{S} and a morphism
with \gamma strongly cartesian from R. In this situation set U'_1 = U_1 \times _ U U', and denote a' : U'_1 \to U' and c' : U'_1 \to U_1 the projections. As u(U'_1) = u(U_1) \times _{u(U)} u(U') we see that \phi '_1 = (\phi _1, \phi ') : V_1 \to u(U'_1) is a morphism in \mathcal{D}. Let \gamma _1 : x_1' \to x_1 be a strongly cartesian morphism of \mathcal{S} with p(\gamma _1) = \phi '_1 (which exists because \mathcal{S} is a fibred category over \mathcal{C}). Then as \gamma : x' \to x is strongly cartesian there exists a unique morphism \alpha ' : x'_1 \to x' with p(\alpha ') = a'. At this point we see that
is a morphism and that
is an element of R which form a solution of the existence problem posed by RMS2.
Finally, suppose that
are two morphisms of u_{pp}\mathcal{S} and suppose that
is an element of R which equalizes the morphisms (a, b, \alpha ) and (a', b', \alpha '). This implies in particular that b = b'. Let d : U_2 \to U_1 be the equalizer of a, a' which exists (see Categories, Lemma 4.18.3). Moreover, u(d) : u(U_2) \to u(U_1) is the equalizer of u(a), u(a') hence (as b = b') there is a morphism \phi _2 : V_1 \to u(U_2) such that \phi _1 = u(d) \circ \phi _1. Let \delta : x_2 \to x_1 be a strongly cartesian morphism of \mathcal{S} with p(\delta ) = u(d). Now we claim that \alpha \circ \delta = \alpha ' \circ \delta . This is true because \gamma is strongly cartesian, \gamma \circ \alpha \circ \delta = \gamma \circ \alpha ' \circ \delta , and p(\alpha \circ \delta ) = p(\alpha ' \circ \delta ). Hence the arrow
is an element of R and equalizes (a, b, \alpha ) and (a', b', \alpha '). Hence R satisfies RMS3 as well. \square
Lemma 8.12.6. With notation and assumptions as in Lemma 8.12.5. Set u_ p\mathcal{S} = R^{-1}u_{pp}\mathcal{S}, see Categories, Section 4.27. Then u_ p\mathcal{S} is a fibred category over \mathcal{D}.
Proof. We use the description of u_ p\mathcal{S} given just above Categories, Lemma 4.27.11. Note that the functor p_{pp} : u_{pp}\mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{D} transforms every element of R to an identity morphism. Hence by Categories, Lemma 4.27.16 we obtain a canonical functor p_ p : u_ p\mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{D} extending the given functor. This is how we think of u_ p\mathcal{S} as a category over \mathcal{D}.
First we want to characterize the \mathcal{D}-strongly cartesian morphisms in u_ p\mathcal{S}. A morphism f : X \to Y of u_ p\mathcal{S} is the equivalence class of a pair (f' : X' \to Y, r : X' \to X) with r \in R. In fact, in u_ p\mathcal{S} we have f = (f', 1) \circ (r, 1)^{-1} with obvious notation. Note that an isomorphism is always strongly cartesian, as are compositions of strongly cartesian morphisms, see Categories, Lemma 4.33.2. Hence f is strongly cartesian if and only if (f', 1) is so. Thus the following claim completely characterizes strongly cartesian morphisms. Claim: A morphism
of u_{pp}\mathcal{S} has image f = ((a, b, \alpha ), 1) strongly cartesian in u_ p\mathcal{S} if and only if \alpha is a strongly cartesian morphism of \mathcal{S}.
Assume \alpha strongly cartesian. Let X = (U, \phi : V \to u(U), x) be another object, and let f_2 : X \to X_2 be a morphism of u_ p\mathcal{S} such that p_ p(f_2) = b \circ b_1 for some b_1 : U \to U_1. To show that f is strongly cartesian we have to show that there exists a unique morphism f_1 : X \to X_1 in u_ p\mathcal{S} such that p_ p(f_1) = b_1 and f_2 = f \circ f_1 in u_ p\mathcal{S}. Write f_2 = (f'_2 : X' \to X_2, r : X' \to X). Again we can write f_2 = (f'_2, 1) \circ (r, 1)^{-1} in u_ p\mathcal{S}. Since (r, 1) is an isomorphism whose image in \mathcal{D} is an identity we see that finding a morphism f_1 : X \to X_1 with the required properties is the same thing as finding a morphism f'_1 : X' \to X_1 in u_ p\mathcal{S} with p(f'_1) = b_1 and f'_2 = f \circ f'_1. Hence we may assume that f_2 is of the form f_2 = ((a_2, b_2, \alpha _2), 1) with b_2 = b \circ b_1. Here is a picture
Now it is clear how to construct the morphism f_1. Namely, set U' = U \times _{U_2} U_1 with projections c : U' \to U and a_1 : U' \to U_1. Pick a strongly cartesian morphism \gamma : x' \to x lifting the morphism c. Since b_2 = b \circ b_1, and since u(U') = u(U) \times _{u(U_2)} u(U_1) we see that \phi ' = (\phi , \phi _1 \circ b_1) : V \to u(U'). Since \alpha is strongly cartesian, and a \circ a_1 = a_2 \circ c = p(\alpha _2 \circ \gamma ) there exists a morphism \alpha _1 : x' \to x_1 lifting a_1 such that \alpha \circ \alpha _1 = \alpha _2 \circ \gamma . Set X' = (U', \phi ' : V \to u(U'), x'). Thus we see that
works, in fact the diagram
is commutative by construction. This proves existence.
Next we prove uniqueness, still in the special case f = ((a, b, \alpha ), 1) and f_2 = ((a_2, b_2, \alpha _2), 1). We strongly advise the reader to skip this part. Suppose that g_1, g'_1 : X \to X_1 are two morphisms of u_ p\mathcal{S} such that p_ p(g_1) = p_ p(g'_1) = b_1 and f_2 = f \circ g_1 = f \circ g'_1. Our goal is to show that g_1 = g'_1. By Categories, Lemma 4.27.13 we may represent g_1 and g'_1 as the equivalence classes of (f_1 : X' \to X_1, r : X' \to X) and (f'_1 : X' \to X_1, r : X' \to X) for some r \in R. By Categories, Lemma 4.27.14 we see that f_2 = f \circ g_1 = f \circ g'_1 means that there exists a morphism r' : X'' \to X' in u_{pp}\mathcal{S} such that r' \circ r \in R and
in u_{pp}\mathcal{S}. Note that now g_1 is represented by (f_1 \circ r', r \circ r') and similarly for g'_1. Hence we may assume that
Write r = (c, \text{id}_ V, \gamma ) : (U', \phi ' : V \to u(U'), x'), f_1 = (a_1, b_1, \alpha _1), and f'_1 = (a'_1, b_1, \alpha '_1). Here we have used the condition that p_ p(g_1) = p_ p(g'_1). The equalities above are now equivalent to a \circ a_1 = a \circ a'_1 = a_2 \circ c and \alpha \circ \alpha _1 = \alpha \circ \alpha '_1 = \alpha _2 \circ \gamma . It need not be the case that a_1 = a'_1 in this situation. Thus we have to precompose by one more morphism from R. Namely, let U'' = \text{Eq}(a_1, a'_1) be the equalizer of a_1 and a'_1 which is a subobject of U'. Denote c' : U'' \to U' the canonical monomorphism. Because of the relations among the morphisms above we see that V \to u(U') maps into u(U'') = u(\text{Eq}(a_1, a'_1)) = \text{Eq}(u(a_1), u(a'_1)). Hence we get a new object (U'', \phi '' : V \to u(U''), x''), where \gamma ' : x'' \to x' is a strongly cartesian morphism lifting \gamma . Then we see that we may precompose f_1 and f'_1 with the element (c', \text{id}_ V, \gamma ') of R. After doing this, i.e., replacing (U', \phi ' : V \to u(U'), x') with (U'', \phi '' : V \to u(U''), x''), we get back to the previous situation where in addition we now have that a_1 = a'_1. In this case it follows formally from the fact that \alpha is strongly cartesian (!) that \alpha _1 = \alpha '_1. This shows that g_1 = g'_1 as desired.
We omit the proof of the fact that for any strongly cartesian morphism of u_ p\mathcal{S} of the form ((a, b, \alpha ), 1) the morphism \alpha is strongly cartesian in \mathcal{S}. (We do not need the characterization of strongly cartesian morphisms in the rest of the proof, although we do use it later in this section.)
Let (U, \phi : V \to u(U), x) be an object of u_ p\mathcal{S}. Let b : V' \to V be a morphism of \mathcal{D}. Then the morphism
is strongly cartesian by the result of the preceding paragraphs and we win. \square
Lemma 8.12.7. With notation and assumptions as in Lemma 8.12.6. If \mathcal{S} is fibred in groupoids, then u_ p\mathcal{S} is fibred in groupoids.
Proof. By Lemma 8.12.6 we know that u_ p\mathcal{S} is a fibred category. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of u_ p\mathcal{S} with p_ p(f) = \text{id}_ V. We are done if we can show that f is invertible, see Categories, Lemma 4.35.2. Write f as the equivalence class of a pair ((a, b, \alpha ), r) with r \in R. Then p_ p(r) = \text{id}_ V, hence p_{pp}((a, b, \alpha )) = \text{id}_ V. Hence b = \text{id}_ V. But any morphism of \mathcal{S} is strongly cartesian, see Categories, Lemma 4.35.2 hence we see that (a, b, \alpha ) \in R is invertible in u_ p\mathcal{S} as desired. \square
Lemma 8.12.8. Let u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} be a functor. Let p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C} and q : \mathcal{T} \to \mathcal{D} be categories over \mathcal{C} and \mathcal{D}. Assume that
p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C} is a fibred category,
q : \mathcal{T} \to \mathcal{D} is a fibred category,
\mathcal{C} has nonempty finite limits, and
u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} commutes with nonempty finite limits.
Then we have a canonical equivalence of categories
of morphism categories.
Proof. In this proof we use the notation x/U to denote an object x of \mathcal{S} which lies over U in \mathcal{C}. Similarly y/V denotes an object y of \mathcal{T} which lies over V in \mathcal{D}. In the same vein \alpha /a : x/U \to x'/U' denotes the morphism \alpha : x \to x' with image a : U \to U' in \mathcal{C}.
Let G : u_ p\mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{T} be a 1-morphism of fibred categories over \mathcal{D}. Denote G' : u_{pp}\mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{T} the composition of G with the canonical (localization) functor u_{pp}\mathcal{S} \to u_ p\mathcal{S}. Then consider the functor H : \mathcal{S} \to u^ p\mathcal{T} given by
on objects and by
on morphisms. Since G transforms strongly cartesian morphisms into strongly cartesian morphisms, we see that if \alpha is strongly cartesian, then H(\alpha ) is strongly cartesian. Namely, we've seen in the proof of Lemma 8.12.6 that in this case the map (a, u(a), \alpha ) becomes strongly cartesian in u_ p\mathcal{S}. Clearly this construction is functorial in G and we obtain a functor
Conversely, let H : \mathcal{S} \to u^ p\mathcal{T} be a 1-morphism of fibred categories. Recall that an object of u^ p\mathcal{T} is a pair (U, y) with y \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{T}_{u(U)}). We denote \text{pr} : u^ p\mathcal{T} \to \mathcal{T} the functor (U, y) \mapsto y. In this case we define a functor G' : u_{pp}\mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{T} by the rules
on objects and we let
be the unique morphism \beta : \phi ^*\text{pr}(H(x)) \to (\phi ')^*\text{pr}(H(x')) such that q(\beta ) = b and the diagram
Such a morphism exists and is unique because \mathcal{T} is a fibred category.
We check that G'(r) is an isomorphism if r \in R. Namely, if
with \alpha strongly cartesian is an element of the right multiplicative system R of Lemma 8.12.5 then H(\alpha ) is strongly cartesian, and \text{pr}(H(\alpha )) is strongly cartesian, see proof of Lemma 8.12.1. Hence in this case the morphism \beta has q(\beta ) = \text{id}_ V and is strongly cartesian. Hence \beta is an isomorphism by Categories, Lemma 4.33.2. Thus by Categories, Lemma 4.27.16 we obtain a canonical extension G : u_ p\mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{T}.
Next, let us prove that G transforms strongly cartesian morphisms into strongly cartesian morphisms. Suppose that f : X \to Y is a strongly cartesian. By the characterization of strongly cartesian morphisms in u_ p\mathcal{S} we can write f as ((a, b, \alpha ) : X' \to Y, r : X' \to Y) where r \in R and \alpha strongly cartesian in \mathcal{S}. By the above it suffices to show that G'(a, b \alpha ) is strongly cartesian. As before the condition that \alpha is strongly cartesian implies that \text{pr}(H(a, \alpha )) : \text{pr}(H(x)) \to \text{pr}(H(x')) is strongly cartesian in \mathcal{T}. Since in the commutative square above now all arrows except possibly \beta is strongly cartesian it follows that also \beta is strongly cartesian as desired. Clearly the construction H \mapsto G is functorial in H and we obtain a functor
To finish the proof of the lemma we have to show that the functors A and B are mutually quasi-inverse. We omit the verifications. \square
Definition 8.12.9. Let f : \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{C} be a morphism of sites given by a continuous functor u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} satisfying the hypotheses and conclusions of Sites, Proposition 7.14.7. Let \mathcal{S} be a stack over \mathcal{C}. In this setting we write f^{-1}\mathcal{S} for the stackification of the fibred category u_ p\mathcal{S} over \mathcal{D} constructed above. We say that f^{-1}\mathcal{S} is the pullback of \mathcal{S} along f.
Of course, if \mathcal{S} is a stack in groupoids, then f^{-1}\mathcal{S} is a stack in groupoids by Lemmas 8.9.1 and 8.12.7.
Lemma 8.12.10. Let f : \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{C} be a morphism of sites given by a continuous functor u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} satisfying the hypotheses and conclusions of Sites, Proposition 7.14.7. Let p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C} and q : \mathcal{T} \to \mathcal{D} be stacks. Then we have a canonical equivalence of categories
of morphism categories.
Proof. For i = 1, 2 an i-morphism of stacks is the same thing as a i-morphism of fibred categories, see Definition 8.4.5. By Lemma 8.12.8 we have already
Hence the result follows from Lemma 8.8.3 as u^ p\mathcal{T} = f_*\mathcal{T} and f^{-1}\mathcal{S} is the stackification of u_ p\mathcal{S}. \square
Lemma 8.12.11. Let f : \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{C} be a morphism of sites given by a continuous functor u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} satisfying the hypotheses and conclusions of Sites, Proposition 7.14.7. Let \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C} be a fibred category, and let \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{S}' be the stackification of \mathcal{S}. Then f^{-1}\mathcal{S}' is the stackification of u_ p\mathcal{S}.
Proof. Omitted. Hint: This is the analogue of Sites, Lemma 7.13.4. \square
The following lemma tells us that the 2-category of stacks over \mathit{Sch}_{fppf} is a “full 2-sub category” of the 2-category of stacks over \mathit{Sch}'_{fppf} provided that \mathit{Sch}'_{fppf} contains \mathit{Sch}_{fppf} (see Topologies, Section 34.12).
Lemma 8.12.12. Let \mathcal{C} and \mathcal{D} be sites. Let u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} be a functor satisfying the assumptions of Sites, Lemma 7.21.8. Let f : \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{C} be the corresponding morphism of sites. Then
for every stack p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C} the canonical functor \mathcal{S} \to f_*f^{-1}\mathcal{S} is an equivalence of stacks,
given stacks \mathcal{S}, \mathcal{S}' over \mathcal{C} the construction f^{-1} induces an equivalence
\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{Stacks}/\mathcal{C}}(\mathcal{S}, \mathcal{S}') \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{Stacks}/\mathcal{D}}(f^{-1}\mathcal{S}, f^{-1}\mathcal{S}')of morphism categories.
Proof. Note that by Lemma 8.12.10 we have an equivalence of categories
Hence (2) follows from (1).
To prove (1) we are going to use Lemma 8.4.8. This lemma tells us that we have to show that can : \mathcal{S} \to f_*f^{-1}\mathcal{S} is fully faithful and that all objects of f_*f^{-1}\mathcal{S} are locally in the essential image.
We quickly describe the functor can, see proof of Lemma 8.12.8. To do this we introduce the functor c'' : \mathcal{S} \to u_{pp}\mathcal{S} defined by c''(x/U) = (U, \text{id} : u(U) \to u(U), x), and c''(\alpha /a) = (a, u(a), \alpha ). We set c' : \mathcal{S} \to u_ p\mathcal{S} equal to the composition of c'' and the canonical functor u_{pp}\mathcal{S} \to u_ p\mathcal{S}. We set c : \mathcal{S} \to f^{-1}\mathcal{S} equal to the composition of c' and the canonical functor u_ p\mathcal{S} \to f^{-1}\mathcal{S}. Then can : \mathcal{S} \to f_*f^{-1}\mathcal{S} is the functor which to x/U associates the pair (U, c(x)) and to \alpha /a the morphism (a, c(\alpha )).
Fully faithfulness. To prove this we are going to use Lemma 8.4.7. Let U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}). Let x, y \in \mathcal{S}_ U. First off, as u is fully faithful, we have
directly from the definition of f_*. Similar holds after pulling back to any U'/U. Because f^{-1}\mathcal{S} is the stackification of u_ p\mathcal{S}, and since u is continuous and cocontinuous the presheaf
is the sheafification of the presheaf
Hence to finish the proof of fully faithfulness it suffices to show that for any U and x, y the map
is bijective. A morphism f : x \to y in u_ p\mathcal{S} over u(U) is given by an equivalence class of diagrams
with \gamma strongly cartesian and b = \text{id}_{u(U)}. But since u is fully faithful we can write \phi = u(c') for some morphism c' : U \to U' and then we see that a \circ c' = \text{id}_ U and c \circ c' = \text{id}_{U'}. Because \gamma is strongly cartesian we can find a morphism \gamma ' : x \to x' lifting c' such that \gamma \circ \gamma ' = \text{id}_ x. By definition of the equivalence classes defining morphisms in u_ p\mathcal{S} it follows that the morphism
of u_{pp}\mathcal{S} induces the morphism f in u_ p\mathcal{S}. This proves that the map is surjective. We omit the proof that it is injective.
Finally, we have to show that any object of f_*f^{-1}\mathcal{S} locally comes from an object of \mathcal{S}. This is clear from the constructions (details omitted). \square
Comments (2)
Comment #1216 by JuanPablo on
Comment #1245 by Johan on