Lemma 37.25.5. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of finite presentation. Let \mathcal{F} be a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module of finite presentation. Let U \subset X be an open subscheme such that U \to Y is quasi-compact. Then the set
E = \{ y \in Y \mid \text{Ass}_{X_ y}(\mathcal{F}_ y) \subset U_ y\}
is locally constructible in Y.
Proof.
Let y \in Y. We have to show that there exists an open neighbourhood V of y in Y such that E \cap V is constructible in V. Thus we may assume that Y is affine. Write Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) and A = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits A_ i as a directed limit of finite type \mathbf{Z}-algebras. By Limits, Lemma 32.10.1 we can find an i and a morphism f_ i : X_ i \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i) of finite presentation whose base change to Y recovers f. After possibly increasing i we may assume there exists a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_{X_ i}-module \mathcal{F}_ i of finite presentation whose pullback to X is isomorphic to \mathcal{F}, see Limits, Lemma 32.10.2. After possibly increasing i one more time we may assume there exists an open subscheme U_ i \subset X_ i whose inverse image in X is U, see Limits, Lemma 32.4.11. By Lemma 37.25.4 it suffices to prove the lemma for f_ i. Thus we reduce to the case where Y is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.
We will use the criterion of Topology, Lemma 5.16.3 to prove that E is constructible in case Y is a Noetherian scheme. To see this let Z \subset Y be an irreducible closed subscheme. We have to show that E \cap Z either contains a nonempty open subset or is not dense in Z. This follows from Lemmas 37.25.2 and 37.25.3 applied to the base change (X, \mathcal{F}, U) \times _ Y Z over Z.
\square
Comments (0)