The Stacks project

13.15 Derived functors on derived categories

In practice derived functors come about most often when given an additive functor between abelian categories.

Situation 13.15.1. Here $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ is an additive functor between abelian categories. This induces exact functors

\[ F : K(\mathcal{A}) \to K(\mathcal{B}), \quad K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to K^{+}(\mathcal{B}), \quad K^{-}(\mathcal{A}) \to K^{-}(\mathcal{B}). \]

See Lemma 13.10.6. We also denote $F$ the composition $K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$, $K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$, and $K^{-}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^-(\mathcal{B})$ of $F$ with the localization functor $K(\mathcal{B}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$, etc. This situation leads to four derived functors we will consider in the following.

  1. The right derived functor of $F : K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$ relative to the multiplicative system $\text{Qis}(\mathcal{A})$.

  2. The right derived functor of $F : K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ relative to the multiplicative system $\text{Qis}^{+}(\mathcal{A})$.

  3. The left derived functor of $F : K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$ relative to the multiplicative system $\text{Qis}(\mathcal{A})$.

  4. The left derived functor of $F : K^{-}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{-}(\mathcal{B})$ relative to the multiplicative system $\text{Qis}^-(\mathcal{A})$.

Each of these cases is an example of Situation 13.14.1.

Some of the ambiguity that may arise is alleviated by the following.

Lemma 13.15.2. In Situation 13.15.1.

  1. Let $X$ be an object of $K^{+}(\mathcal{A})$. The right derived functor of $K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$ is defined at $X$ if and only if the right derived functor of $K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ is defined at $X$. Moreover, the values are canonically isomorphic.

  2. Let $X$ be an object of $K^{+}(\mathcal{A})$. Then $X$ computes the right derived functor of $K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$ if and only if $X$ computes the right derived functor of $K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$.

  3. Let $X$ be an object of $K^{-}(\mathcal{A})$. The left derived functor of $K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$ is defined at $X$ if and only if the left derived functor of $K^{-}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{-}(\mathcal{B})$ is defined at $X$. Moreover, the values are canonically isomorphic.

  4. Let $X$ be an object of $K^{-}(\mathcal{A})$. Then $X$ computes the left derived functor of $K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$ if and only if $X$ computes the left derived functor of $K^{-}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{-}(\mathcal{B})$.

Proof. Let $X$ be an object of $K^{+}(\mathcal{A})$. Consider a quasi-isomorphism $s : X \to X'$ in $K(\mathcal{A})$. By Lemma 13.11.5 there exists quasi-isomorphism $X' \to X''$ with $X''$ bounded below. Hence we see that $X/\text{Qis}^+(\mathcal{A})$ is cofinal in $X/\text{Qis}(\mathcal{A})$. Thus it is clear that (1) holds. Part (2) follows directly from part (1). Parts (3) and (4) are dual to parts (1) and (2). $\square$

Given an object $A$ of an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$ we get a complex

\[ A[0] = ( \ldots \to 0 \to A \to 0 \to \ldots ) \]

where $A$ is placed in degree zero. Hence a functor $\mathcal{A} \to K(\mathcal{A})$, $A \mapsto A[0]$. Let us temporarily say that a partial functor is one that is defined on a subcategory.

Definition 13.15.3. In Situation 13.15.1.

  1. The right derived functors of $F$ are the partial functors $RF$ associated to cases (1) and (2) of Situation 13.15.1.

  2. The left derived functors of $F$ are the partial functors $LF$ associated to cases (3) and (4) of Situation 13.15.1.

  3. An object $A$ of $\mathcal{A}$ is said to be right acyclic for $F$, or acyclic for $RF$ if $A[0]$ computes $RF$.

  4. An object $A$ of $\mathcal{A}$ is said to be left acyclic for $F$, or acyclic for $LF$ if $A[0]$ computes $LF$.

The following few lemmas give some criteria for the existence of enough acyclics.

Lemma 13.15.4. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Let $\mathcal{P} \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ be a subset containing $0$ such that every object of $\mathcal{A}$ is a quotient of an element of $\mathcal{P}$. Let $a \in \mathbf{Z}$.

  1. Given $K^\bullet $ with $K^ n = 0$ for $n > a$ there exists a quasi-isomorphism $P^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ with $P^ n \in \mathcal{P}$ and $P^ n \to K^ n$ surjective for all $n$ and $P^ n = 0$ for $n > a$.

  2. Given $K^\bullet $ with $H^ n(K^\bullet ) = 0$ for $n > a$ there exists a quasi-isomorphism $P^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ with $P^ n \in \mathcal{P}$ for all $n$ and $P^ n = 0$ for $n > a$.

Proof. Proof of part (1). Consider the following induction hypothesis $IH_ n$: There are $P^ j \in \mathcal{P}$, $j \geq n$, with $P^ j = 0$ for $j > a$, maps $d^ j : P^ j \to P^{j + 1}$ for $j \geq n$, and surjective maps $\alpha ^ j : P^ j \to K^ j$ for $j \geq n$ such that the diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ & & P^ n \ar[d]^\alpha \ar[r] & P^{n + 1} \ar[d]^\alpha \ar[r] & P^{n + 2} \ar[d]^\alpha \ar[r] & \ldots \\ \ldots \ar[r] & K^{n - 1} \ar[r] & K^ n \ar[r] & K^{n + 1} \ar[r] & K^{n + 2} \ar[r] & \ldots } \]

is commutative, such that $d^{j + 1} \circ d^ j = 0$ for $j \geq n$, such that $\alpha $ induces isomorphisms $H^ j(K^\bullet ) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ j)/\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{j - 1})$ for $j > n$, and such that $\alpha : \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ n) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d_ K^ n)$ is surjective. Then we choose a surjection

\[ P^{n - 1} \longrightarrow K^{n - 1} \times _{K^ n} \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ n) = K^{n - 1} \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d_ K^ n)} \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ n) \]

with $P^{n - 1}$ in $\mathcal{P}$. This allows us to extend the diagram above to

\[ \xymatrix{ & P^{n - 1} \ar[d]^\alpha \ar[r] & P^ n \ar[d]^\alpha \ar[r] & P^{n + 1} \ar[d]^\alpha \ar[r] & P^{n + 2} \ar[d]^\alpha \ar[r] & \ldots \\ \ldots \ar[r] & K^{n - 1} \ar[r] & K^ n \ar[r] & K^{n + 1} \ar[r] & K^{n + 2} \ar[r] & \ldots } \]

The reader easily checks that $IH_{n - 1}$ holds with this choice.

We finish the proof of (1) as follows. First we note that $IH_ n$ is true for $n = a + 1$ since we can just take $P^ j = 0$ for $j > a$. Hence we see that proceeding by descending induction we produce a complex $P^\bullet $ with $P^ n = 0$ for $n > a$ consisting of objects from $\mathcal{P}$, and a termwise surjective quasi-isomorphism $\alpha : P^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ as desired.

Proof of part (2). The assumption implies that the morphism $\tau _{\leq a}K^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ (Homology, Section 12.15) is a quasi-isomorphism. Apply part (1) to find $P^\bullet \to \tau _{\leq a}K^\bullet $. The composition $P^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ is the desired quasi-isomorphism. $\square$

Lemma 13.15.5. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Let $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ be a subset containing $0$ such that every object of $\mathcal{A}$ is a subobject of an element of $\mathcal{I}$. Let $a \in \mathbf{Z}$.

  1. Given $K^\bullet $ with $K^ n = 0$ for $n < a$ there exists a quasi-isomorphism $K^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ with $K^ n \to I^ n$ injective and $I^ n \in \mathcal{I}$ for all $n$ and $I^ n = 0$ for $n < a$,

  2. Given $K^\bullet $ with $H^ n(K^\bullet ) = 0$ for $n < a$ there exists a quasi-isomorphism $K^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ with $I^ n \in \mathcal{I}$ and $I^ n = 0$ for $n < a$.

Proof. This lemma is dual to Lemma 13.15.4. $\square$

Lemma 13.15.6. In Situation 13.15.1. Let $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ be a subset with the following properties:

  1. every object of $\mathcal{A}$ is a subobject of an element of $\mathcal{I}$,

  2. for any short exact sequence $0 \to P \to Q \to R \to 0$ of $\mathcal{A}$ with $P, Q \in \mathcal{I}$, then $R \in \mathcal{I}$, and $0 \to F(P) \to F(Q) \to F(R) \to 0$ is exact.

Then every object of $\mathcal{I}$ is acyclic for $RF$.

Proof. We may add $0$ to $\mathcal{I}$ if necessary. Pick $A \in \mathcal{I}$. Let $A[0] \to K^\bullet $ be a quasi-isomorphism with $K^\bullet $ bounded below. Then we can find a quasi-isomorphism $K^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ with $I^\bullet $ bounded below and each $I^ n \in \mathcal{I}$, see Lemma 13.15.5. Hence we see that these resolutions are cofinal in the category $A[0]/\text{Qis}^{+}(\mathcal{A})$. To finish the proof it therefore suffices to show that for any quasi-isomorphism $A[0] \to I^\bullet $ with $I^\bullet $ bounded below and $I^ n \in \mathcal{I}$ we have $F(A)[0] \to F(I^\bullet )$ is a quasi-isomorphism. To see this suppose that $I^ n = 0$ for $n < n_0$. Of course we may assume that $n_0 < 0$. Starting with $n = n_0$ we prove inductively that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{n - 1}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ n)$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{-1})$ are elements of $\mathcal{I}$ using property (2) and the exact sequences

\[ 0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ n) \to I^ n \to \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^ n) \to 0. \]

Moreover, property (2) also guarantees that the complex

\[ 0 \to F(I^{n_0}) \to F(I^{n_0 + 1}) \to \ldots \to F(I^{-1}) \to F(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{-1})) \to 0 \]

is exact. The exact sequence $0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{-1}) \to I^0 \to I^0/\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{-1}) \to 0$ implies that $I^0/\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{-1})$ is an element of $\mathcal{I}$. The exact sequence $0 \to A \to I^0/\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{-1}) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^0) \to 0$ then implies that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^0) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^1)$ is an elements of $\mathcal{I}$ and from then on one continues as before to show that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(d^{n - 1}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ n)$ is an element of $\mathcal{I}$ for all $n > 0$. Applying $F$ to each of the short exact sequences mentioned above and using (2) we observe that $F(A)[0] \to F(I^\bullet )$ is an isomorphism as desired. $\square$

Lemma 13.15.7. In Situation 13.15.1. Let $\mathcal{P} \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ be a subset with the following properties:

  1. every object of $\mathcal{A}$ is a quotient of an element of $\mathcal{P}$,

  2. for any short exact sequence $0 \to P \to Q \to R \to 0$ of $\mathcal{A}$ with $Q, R \in \mathcal{P}$, then $P \in \mathcal{P}$, and $0 \to F(P) \to F(Q) \to F(R) \to 0$ is exact.

Then every object of $\mathcal{P}$ is acyclic for $LF$.

Proof. Dual to the proof of Lemma 13.15.6. $\square$

Comments (7)

Comment #455 by Keenan Kidwell on

In 05T4, there is a superscript minus missing in the target of the third functor of the sentence beginning "We also denote ..."

Comment #512 by Keenan Kidwell on

In 05TA, the roles of and should be switched.

Comment #657 by Fan Zheng on

Why additive functors induce exact functors on the homotopy category of chains?

Comment #661 by on

@#657. This is true because an additive functor transforms a termwise split short exact sequence of complexes into a termwise split short exact sequence of complexes and an "exact functor between triangulated categories" is an addtive functor which transforms distinguished triangles into distinguished triangles. Anyway, the precise statement is Lemma 13.10.6.

Comment #7068 by on

Proof of Lemma 13.5.6, line 5: the complex is bounded below and not above.

Comment #7248 by on

Thanks and fixed here. Please in the future leave the comment on the page of the lemma.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05T3. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Section 13.15 as pdf