The Stacks project

[IV, Theorem 18.6.6 and Proposition 18.8.8, EGA]

Lemma 15.45.3. Let $R$ be a local ring. The following are equivalent

  1. $R$ is Noetherian,

  2. $R^ h$ is Noetherian, and

  3. $R^{sh}$ is Noetherian.

In this case we have

  1. $(R^ h)^\wedge $ and $(R^{sh})^\wedge $ are Noetherian complete local rings,

  2. $R^\wedge \to (R^ h)^\wedge $ is an isomorphism,

  3. $R^ h \to (R^ h)^\wedge $ and $R^{sh} \to (R^{sh})^\wedge $ are flat,

  4. $R^\wedge \to (R^{sh})^\wedge $ is formally smooth in the $\mathfrak m_{(R^{sh})^\wedge }$-adic topology,

  5. $(R^\wedge )^{sh} = R^\wedge \otimes _{R^ h} R^{sh}$, and

  6. $((R^\wedge )^{sh})^\wedge = (R^{sh})^\wedge $.

Proof. Since $R \to R^ h \to R^{sh}$ are faithfully flat (Lemma 15.45.1), we see that $R^ h$ or $R^{sh}$ being Noetherian implies that $R$ is Noetherian, see Algebra, Lemma 10.164.1. In the rest of the proof we assume $R$ is Noetherian.

As $\mathfrak m \subset R$ is finitely generated it follows that $\mathfrak m^ h = \mathfrak m R^ h$ and $\mathfrak m^{sh} = \mathfrak mR^{sh}$ are finitely generated, see Lemma 15.45.1. Hence $(R^ h)^\wedge $ and $(R^{sh})^\wedge $ are Noetherian by Algebra, Lemma 10.160.3. This proves (a).

Note that (b) is immediate from Lemma 15.45.1. In particular we see that $(R^ h)^\wedge $ is flat over $R$, see Algebra, Lemma 10.97.3.

Next, we show that $R^ h \to (R^ h)^\wedge $ is flat. Write $R^ h = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i R_ i$ as a directed colimit of localizations of ├ętale $R$-algebras. By Algebra, Lemma 10.39.6 if $(R^ h)^\wedge $ is flat over each $R_ i$, then $R^ h \to (R^ h)^\wedge $ is flat. Note that $R^ h = R_ i^ h$ (by construction). Hence $R_ i^\wedge = (R^ h)^\wedge $ by part (b) is flat over $R_ i$ as desired. To finish the proof of (c) we show that $R^{sh} \to (R^{sh})^\wedge $ is flat. To do this, by a limit argument as above, it suffices to show that $(R^{sh})^\wedge $ is flat over $R$. Note that it follows from Lemma 15.45.1 that $(R^{sh})^\wedge $ is the completion of a free $R$-module. By Lemma 15.27.2 we see this is flat over $R$ as desired. This finishes the proof of (c).

At this point we know (c) is true and that $(R^ h)^\wedge $ and $(R^{sh})^\wedge $ are Noetherian. It follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.164.1 that $R^ h$ and $R^{sh}$ are Noetherian.

Part (d) follows from Lemma 15.45.2 and Lemma 15.37.4.

Part (e) follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.155.13 and the fact that $R^\wedge $ is henselian by Algebra, Lemma 10.153.9.

Proof of (f). Using (e) there is a map $R^{sh} \to (R^\wedge )^{sh}$ which induces a map $(R^{sh})^\wedge \to ((R^\wedge )^{sh})^\wedge $ upon completion. Using (e) there is a map $R^\wedge \to (R^{sh})^\wedge $. Since $(R^{sh})^\wedge $ is strictly henselian (see above) this map induces a map $(R^\wedge )^{sh} \to (R^{sh})^\wedge $ by Algebra, Lemma 10.155.10. Completing we obtain a map $((R^\wedge )^{sh})^\wedge \to (R^{sh})^\wedge $. We omit the verification that these two maps are mutually inverse. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #2730 by on

A reference is EGA IV_4, Theorem 18.6.6 and Proposition 18.8.8.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 06LJ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.