Lemma 100.11.4. Let \mathcal{Z}' \to \mathcal{Z} be a monomorphism of algebraic stacks. Assume there exists a field k and a locally finitely presented, surjective, flat morphism \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathcal{Z}. Then either \mathcal{Z}' is empty or \mathcal{Z}' \to \mathcal{Z} is an equivalence.
Proof. We may assume that \mathcal{Z}' is nonempty. In this case the fibre product T = \mathcal{Z}' \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) is nonempty, see Lemma 100.4.3. Now T is an algebraic space and the projection T \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) is a monomorphism. Hence T = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k), see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.10.8. We conclude that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathcal{Z} factors through \mathcal{Z}'. Suppose the morphism z : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathcal{Z} is given by the object \xi over \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k). We have just seen that \xi is isomorphic to an object \xi ' of \mathcal{Z}' over \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k). Since z is surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation we see that every object of \mathcal{Z} over any scheme is fppf locally isomorphic to a pullback of \xi , hence also to a pullback of \xi '. By descent of objects for stacks in groupoids this implies that \mathcal{Z}' \to \mathcal{Z} is essentially surjective (as well as fully faithful, see Lemma 100.8.4). Hence we win. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: