The Stacks project

67.32 Generic flatness

This section is the analogue of Morphisms, Section 29.27.

Proposition 67.32.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. Assume

  1. $Y$ is reduced,

  2. $f$ is of finite type, and

  3. $\mathcal{F}$ is a finite type $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module.

Then there exists an open dense subspace $W \subset Y$ such that the base change $X_ W \to W$ of $f$ is flat, locally of finite presentation, and quasi-compact and such that $\mathcal{F}|_{X_ W}$ is flat over $W$ and of finite presentation over $\mathcal{O}_{X_ W}$.

Proof. Let $V$ be a scheme and let $V \to Y$ be a surjective étale morphism. Let $X_ V = V \times _ Y X$ and let $\mathcal{F}_ V$ be the restriction of $\mathcal{F}$ to $X_ V$. Suppose that the result holds for the morphism $X_ V \to V$ and the sheaf $\mathcal{F}_ V$. Then there exists an open subscheme $V' \subset V$ such that $X_{V'} \to V'$ is flat and of finite presentation and $\mathcal{F}_{V'}$ is an $\mathcal{O}_{X_{V'}}$-module of finite presentation flat over $V'$. Let $W \subset Y$ be the image of the étale morphism $V' \to Y$, see Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.4.10. Then $V' \to W$ is a surjective étale morphism, hence we see that $X_ W \to W$ is flat, locally of finite presentation, and quasi-compact by Lemmas 67.28.4, 67.30.5, and 67.8.8. By the discussion in Properties of Spaces, Section 66.30 we see that $\mathcal{F}_ W$ is of finite presentation as a $\mathcal{O}_{X_ W}$-module and by Lemma 67.31.3 we see that $\mathcal{F}_ W$ is flat over $W$. This argument reduces the proposition to the case where $Y$ is a scheme.

Suppose we can prove the proposition when $Y$ is an affine scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite type morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$ with $Y$ a scheme, and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a finite type, quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Choose an affine open covering $Y = \bigcup V_ j$. By assumption we can find dense open $W_ j \subset V_ j$ such that $X_{W_ j} \to W_ j$ is flat, locally of finite presentation, and quasi-compact and such that $\mathcal{F}|_{X_{W_ j}}$ is flat over $W_ j$ and of finite presentation as an $\mathcal{O}_{X_{W_ j}}$-module. In this situation we simply take $W = \bigcup W_ j$ and we win. Hence we reduce the proposition to the case where $Y$ is an affine scheme.

Let $Y$ be an affine scheme over $S$, let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite type morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$, and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a finite type, quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Since $f$ is of finite type it is quasi-compact, hence $X$ is quasi-compact. Thus we can find an affine scheme $U$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to X$, see Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.6.3. Note that $U \to Y$ is of finite type (this is what it means for $f$ to be of finite type in this case). Hence we can apply Morphisms, Proposition 29.27.2 to see that there exists a dense open $W \subset Y$ such that $U_ W \to W$ is flat and of finite presentation and such that $\mathcal{F}|_{U_ W}$ is flat over $W$ and of finite presentation as an $\mathcal{O}_{U_ W}$-module. According to our definitions this means that the base change $X_ W \to W$ of $f$ is flat, locally of finite presentation, and quasi-compact and $\mathcal{F}|_{X_ W}$ is flat over $W$ and of finite presentation over $\mathcal{O}_{X_ W}$. $\square$

We cannot improve the result of the lemma above to requiring $X_ W \to W$ to be of finite presentation as $\mathbf{A}^1_{\mathbf{Q}}/\mathbf{Z} \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Q})$ gives a counter example. The problem is that the diagonal morphism $\Delta _{X/Y}$ may not be quasi-compact, i.e., $f$ may not be quasi-separated. Clearly, this is also the only problem.

Proposition 67.32.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. Assume

  1. $Y$ is reduced,

  2. $f$ is quasi-separated,

  3. $f$ is of finite type, and

  4. $\mathcal{F}$ is a finite type $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module.

Then there exists an open dense subspace $W \subset Y$ such that the base change $X_ W \to W$ of $f$ is flat and of finite presentation and such that $\mathcal{F}|_{X_ W}$ is flat over $W$ and of finite presentation over $\mathcal{O}_{X_ W}$.

Proof. This follows immediately from Proposition 67.32.1 and the fact that “of finite presentation” $=$ “locally of finite presentation” $+$ “quasi-compact” $+$ “quasi-separated”. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 06QR. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.