Definition 10.17.1. A *local ring* is a ring with exactly one maximal ideal. The maximal ideal is often denoted $\mathfrak m_ R$ in this case. We often say “let $(R, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ be a local ring” to indicate that $R$ is local, $\mathfrak m$ is its unique maximal ideal and $\kappa = R/\mathfrak m$ is its residue field. A *local homomorphism of local rings* is a ring map $\varphi : R \to S$ such that $R$ and $S$ are local rings and such that $\varphi (\mathfrak m_ R) \subset \mathfrak m_ S$. If it is given that $R$ and $S$ are local rings, then the phrase “*local ring map $\varphi : R \to S$*” means that $\varphi $ is a local homomorphism of local rings.

## 10.17 Local rings

Local rings are the bread and butter of algebraic geometry.

A field is a local ring. Any ring map between fields is a local homomorphism of local rings.

Lemma 10.17.2. Let $R$ be a ring. The following are equivalent:

$R$ is a local ring,

$\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ has exactly one closed point,

$R$ has a maximal ideal $\mathfrak m$ and every element of $R \setminus \mathfrak m$ is a unit, and

$R$ is not the zero ring and for every $x \in R$ either $x$ or $1 - x$ is invertible or both.

**Proof.**
Let $R$ be a ring, and $\mathfrak m$ a maximal ideal. If $x \in R \setminus \mathfrak m$, and $x$ is not a unit then there is a maximal ideal $\mathfrak m'$ containing $x$. Hence $R$ has at least two maximal ideals. Conversely, if $\mathfrak m'$ is another maximal ideal, then choose $x \in \mathfrak m'$, $x \not\in \mathfrak m$. Clearly $x$ is not a unit. This proves the equivalence of (1) and (3). The equivalence (1) and (2) is tautological. If $R$ is local then (4) holds since $x$ is either in $\mathfrak m$ or not. If (4) holds, and $\mathfrak m$, $\mathfrak m'$ are distinct maximal ideals then we may choose $x \in R$ such that $x \bmod \mathfrak m' = 0$ and $x \bmod \mathfrak m = 1$ by the Chinese remainder theorem (Lemma 10.14.4). This element $x$ is not invertible and neither is $1 - x$ which is a contradiction. Thus (4) and (1) are equivalent.
$\square$

The localization $R_\mathfrak p$ of a ring $R$ at a prime $\mathfrak p$ is a local ring with maximal ideal $\mathfrak p R_\mathfrak p$. Namely, the quotient $R_\mathfrak p/\mathfrak pR_\mathfrak p$ is the fraction field of the domain $R/\mathfrak p$ and every element of $R_\mathfrak p$ which is not contained in $\mathfrak pR_\mathfrak p$ is invertible.

Lemma 10.17.3. Let $\varphi : R \to S$ be a ring map. Assume $R$ and $S$ are local rings. The following are equivalent:

$\varphi $ is a local ring map,

$\varphi (\mathfrak m_ R) \subset \mathfrak m_ S$, and

$\varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak m_ S) = \mathfrak m_ R$.

For any $x \in R$, if $\varphi (x)$ is invertible in $S$, then $x$ is invertible in $R$.

**Proof.**
Conditions (1) and (2) are equivalent by definition. If (3) holds then (2) holds. Conversely, if (2) holds, then $\varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak m_ S)$ is a prime ideal containing the maximal ideal $\mathfrak m_ R$, hence $\varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak m_ S) = \mathfrak m_ R$. Finally, (4) is the contrapositive of (2) by Lemma 10.17.2.
$\square$

Let $\varphi : R \to S$ be a ring map. Let $\mathfrak q \subset S$ be a prime and set $\mathfrak p = \varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak q)$. Then the induced ring map $R_\mathfrak p \to S_\mathfrak q$ is a local ring map.

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (2)

Comment #865 by Pieter Belmans on

Comment #872 by Johan on