The Stacks project

Lemma 32.5.3. Let $S$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let $V \subset S$ be a quasi-compact open. Let $I$ be a directed set and let $(V_ i, f_{ii'})$ be an inverse system of schemes over $I$ with affine transition maps, with each $V_ i$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$, and with $V = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits V_ i$. Then there exist

  1. a directed set $J$,

  2. an inverse system of schemes $(S_ j, g_{jj'})$ over $J$,

  3. an order preserving map $\alpha : J \to I$,

  4. open subschemes $V'_ j \subset S_ j$, and

  5. isomorphisms $V'_ j \to V_{\alpha (j)}$

such that

  1. the transition morphisms $g_{jj'} : S_ j \to S_{j'}$ are affine,

  2. each $S_ j$ is of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$,

  3. $g_{jj'}^{-1}(V'_{j'}) = V'_ j$,

  4. $S = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits S_ j$ and $V = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits V'_ j$, and

  5. the diagrams

    \[ \vcenter { \xymatrix{ V \ar[d] \ar[rd] \\ V'_ j \ar[r] & V_{\alpha (j)} } } \quad \text{and}\quad \vcenter { \xymatrix{ V'_ j \ar[r] \ar[d] & V_{\alpha (j)} \ar[d] \\ V'_{j'} \ar[r] & V_{\alpha (j')} } } \]

    are commutative.

Proof. Set $Z = S \setminus V$. Choose affine opens $U_1, \ldots , U_ m \subset S$ such that $Z \subset \bigcup _{l = 1, \ldots , m} U_ l$. Consider the opens

\[ V \subset V \cup U_1 \subset V \cup U_1 \cup U_2 \subset \ldots \subset V \cup \bigcup \nolimits _{l = 1, \ldots , m} U_ l = S \]

If we can prove the lemma successively for each of the cases

\[ V \cup U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_ l \subset V \cup U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_{l + 1} \]

then the lemma will follow for $V \subset S$. In each case we are adding one affine open. Thus we may assume

  1. $S = U \cup V$,

  2. $U$ affine open in $S$,

  3. $V$ quasi-compact open in $S$, and

  4. $V = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i V_ i$ with $(V_ i, f_{ii'})$ an inverse system over a directed set $I$, each $f_{ii'}$ affine and each $V_ i$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$.

Denote $f_ i : V \to V_ i$ the projections. Set $W = U \cap V$. As $S$ is quasi-separated, this is a quasi-compact open of $V$. By Lemma 32.4.11 (and after shrinking $I$) we may assume that there exist opens $W_ i \subset V_ i$ such that $f_{ii'}^{-1}(W_{i'}) = W_ i$ and such that $f_ i^{-1}(W_ i) = W$. Since $W$ is a quasi-compact open of $U$ it is quasi-affine. Hence we may assume (after shrinking $I$ again) that $W_ i$ is quasi-affine for all $i$, see Lemma 32.4.12.

Write $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$. Set $R = \Gamma (W, \mathcal{O}_ W)$, and $R_ i = \Gamma (W_ i, \mathcal{O}_{W_ i})$. By Lemma 32.4.7 we have $R = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i R_ i$. Now we have the maps of rings

\[ \xymatrix{ B \ar[r]_ s & R \\ & R_ i \ar[u]_{t_ i} } \]

We set $B_ i = \{ (b, r) \in B \times R_ i \mid s(b) = t_ i(t)\} $ so that we have a cartesian diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ B \ar[r]_ s & R \\ B_ i \ar[u] \ar[r] & R_ i \ar[u]_{t_ i} } \]

for each $i$. The transition maps $R_ i \to R_{i'}$ induce maps $B_ i \to B_{i'}$. It is clear that $B = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i B_ i$. In the next paragraph we show that for all sufficiently large $i$ the composition $W_ i \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R_ i) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B_ i)$ is an open immersion.

As $W$ is a quasi-compact open of $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$ we can find a finitely many elements $g_ l \in B$, $l = 1, \ldots , m$ such that $D(g_ l) \subset W$ and such that $W = \bigcup _{l = 1, \ldots , m} D(g_ l)$. Note that this implies $D(g_ l) = W_{s(g_ l)}$ as open subsets of $U$, where $W_{s(g_ l)}$ denotes the largest open subset of $W$ on which $s(g_ l)$ is invertible. Hence

\[ B_{g_ l} = \Gamma (D(g_ l), \mathcal{O}_ U) = \Gamma (W_{s(g_ l)}, \mathcal{O}_ W) = R_{s(g_ l)}, \]

where the last equality is Properties, Lemma 28.17.1. Since $W_{s(g_ l)}$ is affine this also implies that $D(s(g_ l)) = W_{s(g_ l)}$ as open subsets of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Since $R = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ i R_ i$ we can (after shrinking $I$) assume there exist $g_{l, i} \in R_ i$ for all $i \in I$ such that $s(g_ l) = t_ i(g_{l, i})$. Of course we choose the $g_{l, i}$ such that $g_{l, i}$ maps to $g_{l, i'}$ under the transition maps $R_ i \to R_{i'}$. Then, by Lemma 32.4.11 we can (after shrinking $I$ again) assume the corresponding opens $D(g_{l, i}) \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R_ i)$ are contained in $W_ i$ for $l = 1, \ldots , m$ and cover $W_ i$. We conclude that the morphism $W_ i \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R_ i) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B_ i)$ is an open immersion, see Lemma 32.5.2.

By Lemma 32.5.1 we can write $B_ i$ as a directed colimit of subalgebras $A_{i, p} \subset B_ i$, $p \in P_ i$ each of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ and such that $W_ i$ is identified with an open subscheme of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_{i, p})$. Let $S_{i, p}$ be the scheme obtained by glueing $V_ i$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_{i, p})$ along the open $W_ i$, see Schemes, Section 26.14. Here is the resulting commutative diagram of schemes:

\[ \xymatrix{ & & V \ar[lld] \ar[d] & W \ar[l] \ar[lld] \ar[d] \\ V_ i \ar[d] & W_ i \ar[l] \ar[d] & S \ar[lld] & U \ar[lld] \ar[l] \\ S_{i, p} & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_{i, p}) \ar[l] } \]

The morphism $S \to S_{i, p}$ arises because the upper right square is a pushout in the category of schemes. Note that $S_{i, p}$ is of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ since it has a finite affine open covering whose members are spectra of finite type $\mathbf{Z}$-algebras. We define a preorder on $J = \coprod _{i \in I} P_ i$ by the rule $(i', p') \geq (i, p)$ if and only if $i' \geq i$ and the map $B_ i \to B_{i'}$ maps $A_{i, p}$ into $A_{i', p'}$. This is exactly the condition needed to define a morphism $S_{i', p'} \to S_{i, p}$: namely make a commutative diagram as above using the transition morphisms $V_{i'} \to V_ i$ and $W_{i'} \to W_ i$ and the morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_{i', p'}) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_{i, p})$ induced by the ring map $A_{i, p} \to A_{i', p'}$. The relevant commutativities have been built into the constructions. We claim that $S$ is the directed limit of the schemes $S_{i, p}$. Since by construction the schemes $V_ i$ have limit $V$ this boils down to the fact that $B$ is the limit of the rings $A_{i, p}$ which is true by construction. The map $\alpha : J \to I$ is given by the rule $j = (i, p) \mapsto i$. The open subscheme $V'_ j$ is just the image of $V_ i \to S_{i, p}$ above. The commutativity of the diagrams in (5) is clear from the construction. This finishes the proof of the lemma. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #1912 by typo on

It should be in "Then, by Lemma 5.24.6 we can (after shrinking again) assume the corresponding opens are contained in , and cover ."

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07RN. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.