Lemma 31.31.1. Let S be a scheme. Let \mathcal{A} be a quasi-coherent graded \mathcal{O}_ S-algebra. Let p : X = \underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{A}) \to S be the relative Proj of \mathcal{A}. Let i : Z \to X be a closed subscheme. Denote \mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{A} the kernel of the canonical map
\mathcal{A} \longrightarrow \bigoplus \nolimits _{d \geq 0} p_*\left((i_*\mathcal{O}_ Z)(d)\right).
If p is quasi-compact, then there is an isomorphism Z = \underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{I}).
Proof.
The morphism p is separated by Constructions, Lemma 27.16.9. As p is quasi-compact, p_* transforms quasi-coherent modules into quasi-coherent modules, see Schemes, Lemma 26.24.1. Hence \mathcal{I} is a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ S-module. In particular, \mathcal{B} = \mathcal{A}/\mathcal{I} is a quasi-coherent graded \mathcal{O}_ S-algebra. The functoriality morphism Z' = \underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{B}) \to \underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{A}) is everywhere defined and a closed immersion, see Constructions, Lemma 27.18.3. Hence it suffices to prove Z = Z' as closed subschemes of X.
Having said this, the question is local on the base and we may assume that S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) and that X = \text{Proj}(A) for some graded R-algebra A. Assume \mathcal{I} = \widetilde{I} for I \subset A a graded ideal. By Constructions, Lemma 27.8.9 there exist f_0, \ldots , f_ n \in A_{+} such that A_{+} \subset \sqrt{(f_0, \ldots , f_ n)} in other words X = \bigcup D_{+}(f_ i). Therefore, it suffices to check that Z \cap D_{+}(f_ i) = Z' \cap D_{+}(f_ i) for each i. By renumbering we may assume i = 0. Say Z \cap D_{+}(f_0), resp. Z' \cap D_{+}(f_0) is cut out by the ideal J, resp. J' of A_{(f_0)}.
The inclusion J' \subset J. Let d be the least common multiple of \deg (f_0), \ldots , \deg (f_ n). Note that each of the twists \mathcal{O}_ X(nd) is invertible, trivialized by f_ i^{nd/\deg (f_ i)} over D_{+}(f_ i), and that for any quasi-coherent module \mathcal{F} on X the multiplication maps \mathcal{O}_ X(nd) \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{F}(m) \to \mathcal{F}(nd + m) are isomorphisms, see Constructions, Lemma 27.10.2. Observe that J' is the ideal generated by the elements g/f_0^ e where g \in I is homogeneous of degree e\deg (f_0) (see proof of Constructions, Lemma 27.11.3). Of course, by replacing g by f_0^ lg for suitable l we may always assume that d | e. Then, since g vanishes as a section of \mathcal{O}_ X(e\deg (f_0)) restricted to Z we see that g/f_0^ d is an element of J. Thus J' \subset J.
Conversely, suppose that g/f_0^ e \in J. Again we may assume d | e. Pick i \in \{ 1, \ldots , n\} . Then Z \cap D_{+}(f_ i) is cut out by some ideal J_ i \subset A_{(f_ i)}. Moreover,
J \cdot A_{(f_0f_ i)} = J_ i \cdot A_{(f_0f_ i)}.
The right hand side is the localization of J_ i with respect to f_0^{\deg (f_ i)}/f_ i^{\deg (f_0)}. It follows that
f_0^{e_ i}g/f_ i^{(e_ i + e)\deg (f_0)/\deg (f_ i)} \in J_ i
for some e_ i \gg 0 sufficiently divisible. This proves that f_0^{\max (e_ i)}g is an element of I, because its restriction to each affine open D_{+}(f_ i) vanishes on the closed subscheme Z \cap D_{+}(f_ i). Hence g/f_0^ e \in J' and we conclude J \subset J' as desired.
\square
Comments (1)
Comment #9574 by Chris on