Lemma 30.24.1. Let $A$ be Noetherian ring complete with respect to an ideal $I$. Let $f : X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ be a proper morphism. Let $\mathcal{I} = I\mathcal{O}_ X$. Then the functor (30.23.3.1) is fully faithful.

## 30.24 Grothendieck's existence theorem, I

In this section we discuss Grothendieck's existence theorem for the projective case. We will use the notion of coherent formal modules developed in Section 30.23. The reader who is familiar with formal schemes is encouraged to read the statement and proof of the theorem in [EGA].

**Proof.**
Let $\mathcal{F}$, $\mathcal{G}$ be coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. Then $\mathcal{H} = \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{O}_ X}(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{F})$ is a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module, see Modules, Lemma 17.21.5. By Lemma 30.23.5 the map

is bijective. Hence fully faithfulness of (30.23.3.1) follows from the theorem on formal functions (Lemma 30.20.6) for the coherent sheaf $\mathcal{H}$. $\square$

Lemma 30.24.2. Let $A$ be Noetherian ring and $I \subset A$ and ideal. Let $f : X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ be a proper morphism and let $\mathcal{L}$ be an $f$-ample invertible sheaf. Let $\mathcal{I} = I\mathcal{O}_ X$. Let $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ be an object of $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathcal{I})$. Then there exists an integer $d_0$ such that

for all $n \geq 0$ and all $d \geq d_0$.

**Proof.**
Set $B = \bigoplus I^ n/I^{n + 1}$ and $\mathcal{B} = \bigoplus \mathcal{I}^ n/\mathcal{I}^{n + 1} = f^*\widetilde{B}$. By Lemma 30.23.8 the graded quasi-coherent $\mathcal{B}$-module $\mathcal{G} = \bigoplus \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \to \mathcal{F}_ n)$ is of finite type. Hence the lemma follows from Lemma 30.19.3 part (2).
$\square$

Lemma 30.24.3. Let $A$ be Noetherian ring complete with respect to an ideal $I$. Let $f : X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ be a projective morphism. Let $\mathcal{I} = I\mathcal{O}_ X$. Then the functor (30.23.3.1) is an equivalence.

**Proof.**
We have already seen that (30.23.3.1) is fully faithful in Lemma 30.24.1. Thus it suffices to show that the functor is essentially surjective.

We first show that every object $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ of $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathcal{I})$ is the quotient of an object in the image of (30.23.3.1). Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an $f$-ample invertible sheaf on $X$. Choose $d_0$ as in Lemma 30.24.2. Choose a $d \geq d_0$ such that $\mathcal{F}_1 \otimes \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d}$ is globally generated by some sections $s_{1, 1}, \ldots , s_{t, 1}$. Since the transition maps of the system

are surjective by the vanishing of $H^1$ we can lift $s_{1, 1}, \ldots , s_{t, 1}$ to a compatible system of global sections $s_{1, n}, \ldots , s_{t, n}$ of $\mathcal{F}_ n \otimes \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d}$. These determine a compatible system of maps

Using Lemma 30.23.3 we deduce that we have a surjective map

as desired.

The result of the previous paragraph and the fact that $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathcal{I})$ is abelian (Lemma 30.23.2) implies that every object of $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathcal{I})$ is a cokernel of a map between objects coming from $\textit{Coh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. As (30.23.3.1) is fully faithful and exact by Lemmas 30.24.1 and 30.23.4 we conclude. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)