Lemma 15.5.1. Let R be a ring. Let A \to B and C \to B be R-algebra maps. Assume
R is Noetherian,
A, B, C are of finite type over R,
A \to B is surjective, and
B is finite over C.
Then A \times _ B C is of finite type over R.
Fibre products of rings have to do with pushouts of schemes. Some cases of pushouts of schemes are discussed in More on Morphisms, Section 37.14.
Lemma 15.5.1. Let R be a ring. Let A \to B and C \to B be R-algebra maps. Assume
R is Noetherian,
A, B, C are of finite type over R,
A \to B is surjective, and
B is finite over C.
Then A \times _ B C is of finite type over R.
Proof. Set D = A \times _ B C. There is a commutative diagram
with exact rows. Choose y_1, \ldots , y_ n \in B which are generators for B as a C-module. Choose x_ i \in A mapping to y_ i. Then 1, x_1, \ldots , x_ n are generators for A as a D-module. The map D \to A \times C is injective, and the ring A \times C is finite as a D-module (because it is the direct sum of the finite D-modules A and C). Hence the lemma follows from the Artin-Tate lemma (Algebra, Lemma 10.51.7). \square
Lemma 15.5.2. Let R be a Noetherian ring. Let I be a finite set. Suppose given a cartesian diagram
with \psi _ i and \varphi _ i surjective, and Q, A_ i, B_ i of finite type over R. Then P is of finite type over R.
Proof. Follows from Lemma 15.5.1 and induction on the size of I. Namely, let I = I' \amalg \{ i_0\} . Let P' be the ring defined by the diagram of the lemma using I'. Then P' is of finite type by induction hypothesis. Finally, P sits in a fibre product diagram
to which the lemma applies. \square
Lemma 15.5.3. Suppose given a cartesian diagram of rings
i.e., B' = B \times _ R R'. If h \in B' corresponds to g \in B and f \in R' such that s(g) = t(f), then the diagram
is cartesian too.
Proof. The equality B' = B \times _ R R' tells us that
is an exact sequence of B'-modules. We have B_ g = B_ h, R'_ f = R'_ h, and R_{s(g)} = R_{t(f)} = R_ h as B'-modules. By exactness of localization (Algebra, Proposition 10.9.12) we find that
is an exact sequence. This proves the lemma. \square
Consider a commutative diagram of rings
Consider the functor (where the fibre product of categories is as constructed in Categories, Example 4.31.3)
where can is the canonical identification L' \otimes _{B'} B \otimes _ B R = L' \otimes _{B'} R' \otimes _{R'} R. In the following we will write (N, M', \varphi ) for an object of the right hand side, i.e., N is a B-module, M' is an R'-module and \varphi : N \otimes _ B R \to M' \otimes _{R'} R is an isomorphism.
Lemma 15.5.4. Given a commutative diagram of rings
the functor (15.5.3.1) has a right adjoint, namely the functor
(see proof for elucidation).
Proof. Given an object (N, M', \varphi ) of the category \text{Mod}_ B \times _{\text{Mod}_ R} \text{Mod}_{R'} we set
viewed as a B'-module. The adjointness statement is that for a B'-module L' and a triple (N, M', \varphi ) we have
By Algebra, Lemma 10.14.3 the right hand side is equal to
Thus it is clear that for a pair (g, f') of elements of this fibre product we get an B'-linear map L' \to N \times _\varphi M', l' \mapsto (g(l'), f'(l')). Conversely, given a B' linear map g' : L' \to N \times _\varphi M' we can set g equal to the composition L' \to N \times _\varphi M' \to N and f' equal to the composition L' \to N \times _\varphi M' \to M'. These constructions are mutually inverse to each other and define the desired isomorphism. \square
Comments (0)