The Stacks project

Lemma 7.43.3. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a sheaf on $\mathcal{C}$. The following are equivalent

  1. $\mathcal{F}$ is a subobject of the final object of $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$, and

  2. the topos $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})/\mathcal{F}$ is a subtopos of $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$.

Proof. We have seen in Lemma 7.30.1 that $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})/\mathcal{F}$ is a topos. In fact, we recall the proof. First we apply Lemma 7.29.5 to see that we may assume $\mathcal{C}$ is a site with a subcanonical topology, fibre products, a final object $X$, and an object $U$ with $\mathcal{F} = h_ U$. The proof of Lemma 7.30.1 shows that the morphism of topoi $j_\mathcal {F} : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})/\mathcal{F} \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$ is equal (modulo certain identifications) to the localization morphism $j_ U : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}/U) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$.

Assume (2). This means that $j_ U^{-1}j_{U, *}\mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{G}$ is an isomorphism for all sheaves $\mathcal{G}$ on $\mathcal{C}/U$. For any object $Z/U$ of $\mathcal{C}/U$ we have

\[ (j_{U, *}h_{Z/U})(U) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{C}/U}(U \times _ X U/U, Z/U) \]

by Lemma 7.27.2. Setting $\mathcal{G} = h_{Z/U}$ in the equality above we obtain

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{C}/U}(U \times _ X U/U, Z/U) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{C}/U}(U, Z/U) \]

for all $Z/U$. By Yoneda's lemma (Categories, Lemma 4.3.5) this implies $U \times _ X U = U$. By Categories, Lemma 4.13.3 $U \to X$ is a monomorphism, in other words (1) holds.

Assume (1). Then $j_ U^{-1} j_{U, *} = \text{id}$ by Lemma 7.27.4. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #1552 by Ingo Blechschmidt on

The statement of the lemma contains a type error: is simultaneously regarded as a sheaf on and as an object of . There are two ways to fix this: Either continue to assume that is a sheaf (and then formulate (1) as " is a subobject of the final object of ") or assume that is an object of (which should then probably get a different variable name).


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 08LW. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.