The Stacks project

9.14 Purely inseparable extensions

Purely inseparable extensions are the opposite of the separable extensions defined in the previous section. These extensions only show up in positive characteristic.

Definition 9.14.1. Let $F$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$. Let $K/F$ be an extension.

  1. An element $\alpha \in K$ is purely inseparable over $F$ if there exists a power $q$ of $p$ such that $\alpha ^ q \in F$.

  2. The extension $K/F$ is said to be purely inseparable if and only if every element of $K$ is purely inseparable over $F$.

Observe that a purely inseparable extension is necessarily algebraic. Let $F$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$. An example of a purely inseparable extension is gotten by adjoining the $p$th root of an element $t \in F$ which does not yet have one. Namely, the lemma below shows that $P = x^ p - t$ is irreducible, and hence

\[ K = F[x]/(P) = F[t^{1/p}] \]

is a field. And $K$ is purely inseparable over $F$ because every element

\[ a_0 + a_1t^{1/p} + \ldots + a_{p - 1}t^{(p - 1)/p},\quad a_ i \in F \]

of $K$ has $p$th power equal to

\[ (a_0 + a_1t^{1/p} + \ldots + a_{p - 1}t^{(p - 1)/p})^ p = a_0^ p + a_1^ p t + \ldots + a_{p - 1}^ pt^{p - 1} \in F \]

This situation occurs for the field $\mathbf{F}_ p(t)$ of rational functions over $\mathbf{F}_ p$.

Lemma 9.14.2. Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $F$ be a field of characteristic $p$. Let $t \in F$ be an element which does not have a $p$th root in $F$. Then the polynomial $x^ p - t$ is irreducible over $F$.

Proof. To see this, suppose that we have a factorization $x^ p - t = f g$. Taking derivatives we get $f' g + f g' = 0$. Note that neither $f' = 0$ nor $g' = 0$ as the degrees of $f$ and $g$ are smaller than $p$. Moreover, $\deg (f') < \deg (f)$ and $\deg (g') < \deg (g)$. We conclude that $f$ and $g$ have a factor in common. Thus if $x^ p - t$ is reducible, then it is of the form $x^ p - t = c f^ n$ for some irreducible $f$, $c \in F^*$, and $n > 1$. Since $p$ is a prime number this implies $n = p$ and $f$ linear, which would imply $x^ p - t$ has a root in $F$. Contradiction. $\square$

We will see that taking $p$th roots is a very important operation in characteristic $p$.

Lemma 9.14.3. Let $E/k$ and $F/E$ be purely inseparable extensions of fields. Then $F/k$ is a purely inseparable extension of fields.

Proof. Say the characteristic of $k$ is $p$. Choose $\alpha \in F$. Then $\alpha ^ q \in E$ for some $p$-power $q$. Whereupon $(\alpha ^ q)^{q'} \in k$ for some $p$-power $q'$. Hence $\alpha ^{qq'} \in k$. $\square$

Lemma 9.14.4. Let $E/k$ be a field extension. Then the elements of $E$ purely-inseparable over $k$ form a subextension of $E/k$.

Proof. Let $p$ be the characteristic of $k$. Let $\alpha , \beta \in E$ be purely inseparable over $k$. Say $\alpha ^ q \in k$ and $\beta ^{q'} \in k$ for some $p$-powers $q, q'$. If $q''$ is a $p$-power, then $(\alpha + \beta )^{q''} = \alpha ^{q''} + \beta ^{q''}$. Hence if $q'' \geq q, q'$, then we conclude that $\alpha + \beta $ is purely inseparable over $k$. Similarly for the difference, product and quotient of $\alpha $ and $\beta $. $\square$

Lemma 9.14.5. Let $E/F$ be a finite purely inseparable field extension of characteristic $p > 0$. Then there exists a sequence of elements $\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ n \in E$ such that we obtain a tower of fields

\[ E = F(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ n) \supset F(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _{n - 1}) \supset \ldots \supset F(\alpha _1) \supset F \]

such that each intermediate extension is of degree $p$ and comes from adjoining a $p$th root. Namely, $\alpha _ i^ p \in F(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _{i - 1})$ is an element which does not have a $p$th root in $F(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _{i - 1})$ for $i = 1, \ldots , n$.

Proof. By induction on the degree of $E/F$. If the degree of the extension is $1$ then the result is clear (with $n = 0$). If not, then choose $\alpha \in E$, $\alpha \not\in F$. Say $\alpha ^{p^ r} \in F$ for some $r > 0$. Pick $r$ minimal and replace $\alpha $ by $\alpha ^{p^{r - 1}}$. Then $\alpha \not\in F$, but $\alpha ^ p \in F$. Then $t = \alpha ^ p$ is not a $p$th power in $F$ (because that would imply $\alpha \in F$, see Lemma 9.12.5 or its proof). Thus $F \subset F(\alpha )$ is a subextension of degree $p$ (Lemma 9.14.2). By induction we find $\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ n \in E$ generating $E/F(\alpha )$ satisfying the conclusions of the lemma. The sequence $\alpha , \alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ n$ does the job for the extension $E/F$. $\square$


Lemma 9.14.6. Let $E/F$ be an algebraic field extension. There exists a unique subextension $E/E_{sep}/F$ such that $E_{sep}/F$ is separable and $E/E_{sep}$ is purely inseparable.

Proof. If the characteristic is zero we set $E_{sep} = E$. Assume the characteristic is $p > 0$. Let $E_{sep}$ be the set of elements of $E$ which are separable over $F$. This is a subextension by Lemma 9.12.13 and of course $E_{sep}$ is separable over $F$. Given an $\alpha $ in $E$ there exists a $p$-power $q$ such that $\alpha ^ q$ is separable over $F$. Namely, $q$ is that power of $p$ such that the minimal polynomial of $\alpha $ is of the form $P(x^ q)$ with $P$ separable algebraic, see Lemma 9.12.1. Hence $E/E_{sep}$ is purely inseparable. Uniqueness is clear. $\square$

Definition 9.14.7. Let $E/F$ be an algebraic field extension. Let $E_{sep}$ be the subextension found in Lemma 9.14.6.

  1. The integer $[E_{sep} : F]$ is called the separable degree of the extension. Notation $[E : F]_ s$.

  2. The integer $[E : E_{sep}]$ is called the inseparable degree, or the degree of inseparability of the extension. Notation $[E : F]_ i$.

Of course in characteristic $0$ we have $[E : F] = [E : F]_ s$ and $[E : F]_ i = 1$. By multiplicativity (Lemma 9.7.7) we have

\[ [E : F] = [E : F]_ s [E : F]_ i \]

even in case some of these degrees are infinite. In fact, the separable degree and the inseparable degree are multiplicative too (see Lemma 9.14.9).

Lemma 9.14.8. Let $K/F$ be a finite extension. Let $\overline{F}$ be an algebraic closure of $F$. Then $[K : F]_ s = |\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(K, \overline{F})|$.

Proof. We first prove this when $K/F$ is purely inseparable. Namely, we claim that in this case there is a unique map $K \to \overline{F}$. This can be seen by choosing a sequence of elements $\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ n \in K$ as in Lemma 9.14.5. The irreducible polynomial of $\alpha _ i$ over $F(\alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _{i - 1})$ is $x^ p - \alpha _ i^ p$. Applying Lemma 9.12.9 we see that $|\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(K, \overline{F})| = 1$. On the other hand, $[K : F]_ s = 1$ in this case hence the equality holds.

Let's return to a general finite extension $K/F$. In this case choose $F \subset K_ s \subset K$ as in Lemma 9.14.6. By Lemma 9.12.11 we have $|\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(K_ s, \overline{F})| = [K_ s : F] = [K : F]_ s$. On the other hand, every field map $\sigma ' : K_ s \to \overline{F}$ extends to a unique field map $\sigma : K \to \overline{F}$ by the result of the previous paragraph. In other words $|\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(K, \overline{F})| = |\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(K_ s, \overline{F})|$ and the proof is done. $\square$

Lemma 9.14.9 (Multiplicativity). Suppose given a tower of algebraic field extensions $K/E/F$. Then

\[ [K : F]_ s = [K : E]_ s [E : F]_ s \quad \text{and}\quad [K : F]_ i = [K : E]_ i [E : F]_ i \]

Proof. We first prove this in case $K$ is finite over $F$. Since we have multiplicativity for the usual degree (by Lemma 9.7.7) it suffices to prove one of the two formulas. By Lemma 9.14.8 we have $[K : F]_ s = |\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(K, \overline{F})|$. By the same lemma, given any $\sigma \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F})$ the number of extensions of $\sigma $ to a map $\tau : K \to \overline{F}$ is $[K : E]_ s$. Namely, via $E \cong \sigma (E) \subset \overline{F}$ we can view $\overline{F}$ as an algebraic closure of $E$. Combined with the fact that there are $[E : F]_ s = |\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F})|$ choices for $\sigma $ we obtain the result.

We omit the proof if the extensions are infinite. $\square$

Comments (3)

Comment #4833 by Kasper Andersen on

Small typo: In lines 7 and 9 after Definition 09HE the exponents on should be changed from to .

Comment #4930 by Marwan on

Small fix, we skhould have instead of right after the first definition.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 09HD. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.