Definition 9.15.1. Let E/F be an algebraic field extension. We say E is normal over F if for all \alpha \in E the minimal polynomial P of \alpha over F splits completely into linear factors over E.
9.15 Normal extensions
Let P \in F[x] be a nonconstant polynomial over a field F. We say P splits completely into linear factors over F or splits completely over F if there exist c \in F^*, n \geq 1, \alpha _1, \ldots , \alpha _ n \in F such that
in F[x]. Normal extensions are defined as follows.
As in the case of separable extensions, it takes a bit of work to establish the basic properties of this notion.
Lemma 9.15.2. Let K/E/F be a tower of algebraic field extensions. If K is normal over F, then K is normal over E.
Proof. Let \alpha \in K. Let P be the minimal polynomial of \alpha over F. Let Q be the minimal polynomial of \alpha over E. Then Q divides P in the polynomial ring E[x], say P = QR. Hence, if P splits completely over K, then so does Q. \square
Lemma 9.15.3. Let F be a field. Let M/F be an algebraic extension. Let M/E_ i/F, i \in I be subextensions with E_ i/F normal. Then \bigcap E_ i is normal over F.
Proof. Direct from the definitions. \square
Lemma 9.15.4. Let E/F be a normal algebraic field extension. Then the subextension E/E_{sep}/F of Lemma 9.14.6 is normal.
Proof. If the characteristic is zero, then E_{sep} = E, and the result is clear. If the characteristic is p > 0, then E_{sep} is the set of elements of E which are separable over F. Then if \alpha \in E_{sep} has minimal polynomial P write P = c(x - \alpha )(x - \alpha _2) \ldots (x - \alpha _ d) with \alpha _2, \ldots , \alpha _ d \in E. Since P is a separable polynomial and since \alpha _ i is a root of P, we conclude \alpha _ i \in E_{sep} as desired. \square
Lemma 9.15.5. Let E/F be an algebraic extension of fields. Let \overline{F} be an algebraic closure of F. The following are equivalent
E is normal over F, and
for every pair \sigma , \sigma ' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F}) we have \sigma (E) = \sigma '(E).
Proof. Let \mathcal{P} be the set of all minimal polynomials over F of all elements of E. Set
It is clear that if E is normal over F, then \sigma (E) = T for all \sigma \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F}). Thus we see that (1) implies (2).
Conversely, assume (2). Pick \beta \in T. We can find a corresponding \alpha \in E whose minimal polynomial P \in \mathcal{P} annihilates \beta . Because F(\alpha ) = F[x]/(P) we can find an element \sigma _0 \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(F(\alpha ), \overline{F}) mapping \alpha to \beta . By Lemma 9.10.5 we can extend \sigma _0 to a \sigma \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F}). Whence we see that \beta is in the common image of all embeddings \sigma : E \to \overline{F}. It follows that \sigma (E) = T for any \sigma . Fix a \sigma . Now let P \in \mathcal{P}. Then we can write
for some n and \beta _ i \in \overline{F} by Lemma 9.10.2. Observe that \beta _ i \in T. Thus \beta _ i = \sigma (\alpha _ i) for some \alpha _ i \in E. Thus P = (x - \alpha _1) \ldots (x - \alpha _ n) splits completely over E. This finishes the proof. \square
Lemma 9.15.6. Let E/F be an algebraic extension of fields. If E is generated by \alpha _ i \in E, i \in I over F and if for each i the minimal polynomial of \alpha _ i over F splits completely in E, then E/F is normal.
Proof. Let P_ i be the minimal polynomial of \alpha _ i over F. Let \alpha _ i = \alpha _{i, 1}, \alpha _{i, 2}, \ldots , \alpha _{i, d_ i} be the roots of P_ i over E. Given two embeddings \sigma , \sigma ' : E \to \overline{F} over F we see that
because both sides are equal to the set of roots of P_ i in \overline{F}. The elements \alpha _{i, j} generate E over F and we find that \sigma (E) = \sigma '(E). Hence E/F is normal by Lemma 9.15.5. \square
Lemma 9.15.7. Let L/M/K be a tower of algebraic extensions.
If M/K is normal, then any automorphism \tau of L/K induces an automorphism \tau |_ M : M \to M.
If L/K is normal, then any K-algebra map \sigma : M \to L extends to an automorphism of L.
Proof. Choose an algebraic closure \overline{L} of L (Theorem 9.10.4).
Let \tau be as in (1). Then \tau (M) = M as subfields of \overline{L} by Lemma 9.15.5 and hence \tau |_ M : M \to M is an automorphism.
Let \sigma : M \to L be as in (2). By Lemma 9.10.5 we can extend \sigma to a map \tau : L \to \overline{L}, i.e., such that
is commutative. By Lemma 9.15.5 we see that \tau (L) = L. Hence \tau : L \to L is an automorphism which extends \sigma . \square
Definition 9.15.8. Let E/F be an extension of fields. Then \text{Aut}(E/F) or \text{Aut}_ F(E) denotes the automorphism group of E as an object of the category of F-extensions. Elements of \text{Aut}(E/F) are called automorphisms of E over F or automorphisms of E/F.
Here is a characterization of normal extensions in terms of automorphisms.
Lemma 9.15.9. Let E/F be a finite extension. We have
with equality if and only if E is normal over F.
Proof. Choose an algebraic closure \overline{F} of F. Recall that [E : F]_ s = |\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F})|. Pick an element \sigma _0 \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F}). Then the map
is injective. Thus the inequality. If equality holds, then every \sigma \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F}) is gotten by precomposing \sigma _0 by an automorphism. Hence \sigma (E) = \sigma _0(E). Thus E is normal over F by Lemma 9.15.5.
Conversely, assume that E/F is normal. Then by Lemma 9.15.5 we have \sigma (E) = \sigma _0(E) for all \sigma \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ F(E, \overline{F}). Thus we get an automorphism of E over F by setting \tau = \sigma _0^{-1} \circ \sigma . Whence the map displayed above is surjective. \square
Lemma 9.15.10. Let L/K be an algebraic normal extension of fields. Let E/K be an extension of fields. Then either there is no K-embedding from L to E or there is one \tau : L \to E and every other one is of the form \tau \circ \sigma where \sigma \in \text{Aut}(L/K).
Proof. Given \tau replace L by \tau (L) \subset E and apply Lemma 9.15.7. \square
Comments (3)
Comment #9564 by Zhenhua Wu on
Comment #9565 by Zhenhua Wu on
Comment #9568 by Zhenhua Wu on