Lemma 22.16.1. Let $(A, \text{d})$ be a differential graded algebra. The functor $\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})} \to D(A, \text{d})$ defined has the natural structure of a $\delta $-functor, with

with $p$ and $q$ as explained above.

Let $(A, \text{d})$ be a differential graded algebra. Consider the functor $\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})} \to K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})})$. This functor is **not** a $\delta $-functor in general. However, it turns out that the functor $\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})} \to D(A, \text{d})$ is a $\delta $-functor. In order to see this we have to define the morphisms $\delta $ associated to a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to K \xrightarrow {a} L \xrightarrow {b} M \to 0 \]

in the abelian category $\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})}$. Consider the cone $C(a)$ of the morphism $a$. We have $C(a) = L \oplus K$ and we define $q : C(a) \to M$ via the projection to $L$ followed by $b$. Hence a homomorphism of differential graded $A$-modules

\[ q : C(a) \longrightarrow M. \]

It is clear that $q \circ i = b$ where $i$ is as in Definition 22.6.1. Note that, as $a$ is injective, the kernel of $q$ is identified with the cone of $\text{id}_ K$ which is acyclic. Hence we see that $q$ is a quasi-isomorphism. According to Lemma 22.9.4 the triangle

\[ (K, L, C(a), a, i, -p) \]

is a distinguished triangle in $K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})})$. As the localization functor $K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})}) \to D(A, \text{d})$ is exact we see that $(K, L, C(a), a, i, -p)$ is a distinguished triangle in $D(A, \text{d})$. Since $q$ is a quasi-isomorphism we see that $q$ is an isomorphism in $D(A, \text{d})$. Hence we deduce that

\[ (K, L, M, a, b, -p \circ q^{-1}) \]

is a distinguished triangle of $D(A, \text{d})$. This suggests the following lemma.

Lemma 22.16.1. Let $(A, \text{d})$ be a differential graded algebra. The functor $\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})} \to D(A, \text{d})$ defined has the natural structure of a $\delta $-functor, with

\[ \delta _{K \to L \to M} = - p \circ q^{-1} \]

with $p$ and $q$ as explained above.

**Proof.**
We have already seen that this choice leads to a distinguished triangle whenever given a short exact sequence of complexes. We have to show functoriality of this construction, see Derived Categories, Definition 13.3.6. This follows from Lemma 22.6.2 with a bit of work. Compare with Derived Categories, Lemma 13.12.1.
$\square$

Lemma 22.16.2. Let $(A, \text{d})$ be a differential graded algebra. Let $M_ n$ be a system of differential graded modules. Then the derived colimit $\text{hocolim} M_ n$ in $D(A, \text{d})$ is represented by the differential graded module $\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits M_ n$.

**Proof.**
Set $M = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits M_ n$. We have an exact sequence of differential graded modules

\[ 0 \to \bigoplus M_ n \to \bigoplus M_ n \to M \to 0 \]

by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.31.6 (applied the underlying complexes of abelian groups). The direct sums are direct sums in $D(\mathcal{A})$ by Lemma 22.15.4. Thus the result follows from the definition of derived colimits in Derived Categories, Definition 13.31.1 and the fact that a short exact sequence of complexes gives a distinguished triangle (Lemma 22.16.1). $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)