Note that if $R$ is a ring, then $R$ is a differential graded algebra over itself (with $R = R^0$ of course). In this case a differential graded $R$-module is the same thing as a complex of $R$-modules. In particular, given two differential graded $R$-modules $M$ and $N$ we denote $M \otimes _ R N$ the differential graded $R$-module corresponding to the total complex associated to the double complex obtained by the tensor product of the complexes of $R$-modules associated to $M$ and $N$.

Definition 22.26.1. Let $R$ be a ring. A differential graded category $\mathcal{A}$ over $R$ is a category where every morphism set is given the structure of a differential graded $R$-module and where for $x, y, z \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ composition is $R$-bilinear and induces a homomorphism

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(y, z) \otimes _ R \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(x, y) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(x, z)$

of differential graded $R$-modules.

The final condition of the definition signifies the following: if $f \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}^ n(x, y)$ and $g \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}^ m(y, z)$ are homogeneous of degrees $n$ and $m$, then

$\text{d}(g \circ f) = \text{d}(g) \circ f + (-1)^ mg \circ \text{d}(f)$

in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}^{n + m + 1}(x, z)$. This follows from the sign rule for the differential on the total complex of a double complex, see Homology, Definition 12.18.3.

Definition 22.26.2. Let $R$ be a ring. A functor of differential graded categories over $R$ is a functor $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ where for all objects $x, y$ of $\mathcal{A}$ the map $F : \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(x, y) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(F(x), F(y))$ is a homomorphism of differential graded $R$-modules.

Given a differential graded category we are often interested in the corresponding categories of complexes and homotopy category. Here is a formal definition.

Definition 22.26.3. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a differential graded category over $R$. Then we let

1. the category of complexes of $\mathcal{A}$1 be the category $\text{Comp}(\mathcal{A})$ whose objects are the same as the objects of $\mathcal{A}$ and with

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Comp}(\mathcal{A})}(x, y) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d : \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^0_\mathcal {A}(x, y) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^1_\mathcal {A}(x, y))$
2. the homotopy category of $\mathcal{A}$ be the category $K(\mathcal{A})$ whose objects are the same as the objects of $\mathcal{A}$ and with

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(x, y) = H^0(\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(x, y))$

Our use of the symbol $K(\mathcal{A})$ is nonstandard, but at least is compatible with the use of $K(-)$ in other chapters of the Stacks project.

Definition 22.26.4. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a differential graded category over $R$. A direct sum $(x, y, z, i, j, p, q)$ in $\mathcal{A}$ (notation as in Homology, Remark 12.3.6) is a differential graded direct sum if $i, j, p, q$ are homogeneous of degree $0$ and closed, i.e., $\text{d}(i) = 0$, etc.

Lemma 22.26.5. Let $R$ be a ring. A functor $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ of differential graded categories over $R$ induces functors $\text{Comp}(\mathcal{A}) \to \text{Comp}(\mathcal{B})$ and $K(\mathcal{A}) \to K(\mathcal{B})$.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$

Example 22.26.6 (Differential graded category of complexes). Let $\mathcal{B}$ be an additive category. We will construct a differential graded category $\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})$ over $R = \mathbf{Z}$ whose associated category of complexes is $\text{Comp}(\mathcal{B})$ and whose associated homotopy category is $K(\mathcal{B})$. As objects of $\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})$ we take complexes of $\mathcal{B}$. Given complexes $A^\bullet$ and $B^\bullet$ of $\mathcal{B}$, we sometimes also denote $A^\bullet$ and $B^\bullet$ the corresponding graded objects of $\mathcal{B}$ (i.e., forget about the differential). Using this abuse of notation, we set

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})}(A^\bullet , B^\bullet ) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Gr}^{gr}(\mathcal{B})}(A^\bullet , B^\bullet ) = \bigoplus \nolimits _{n \in \mathbf{Z}} \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(A, B)$

as a graded $\mathbf{Z}$-module with notation and definitions as in Example 22.25.5. In other words, the $n$th graded piece is the abelian group of homogeneous morphism of degree $n$ of graded objects

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(A^\bullet , B^\bullet ) = \prod \nolimits _{p + q = n} \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {B}(A^{-q}, B^ p)$

Observe reversal of indices and observe we have a direct product and not a direct sum. For an element $f \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(A^\bullet , B^\bullet )$ of degree $n$ we set

$\text{d}(f) = \text{d}_ B \circ f - (-1)^ n f \circ \text{d}_ A$

The sign is exactly as in More on Algebra, Section 15.72. To make sense of this we think of $\text{d}_ B$ and $\text{d}_ A$ as maps of graded objects of $\mathcal{B}$ homogeneous of degree $1$ and we use composition in the category $\text{Gr}^{gr}(\mathcal{B})$ on the right hand side. In terms of components, if $f = (f_{p, q})$ with $f_{p, q} : A^{-q} \to B^ p$ we have

22.26.6.1
$$\label{dga-equation-differential-hom-complex} \text{d}(f_{p, q}) = \text{d}_ B \circ f_{p, q} - (-1)^{p + q} f_{p, q} \circ \text{d}_ A$$

Note that the first term of this expression is in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {B}(A^{-q}, B^{p + 1})$ and the second term is in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {B}(A^{-q - 1}, B^ p)$. The reader checks that

1. $\text{d}$ has square zero,

2. an element $f$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(A^\bullet , B^\bullet )$ has $\text{d}(f) = 0$ if and only if the morphism $f : A^\bullet \to B^\bullet [n]$ of graded objects of $\mathcal{B}$ is actually a map of complexes,

3. in particular, the category of complexes of $\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})$ is equal to $\text{Comp}(\mathcal{B})$,

4. the morphism of complexes defined by $f$ as in (2) is homotopy equivalent to zero if and only if $f = \text{d}(g)$ for some $g \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^{n - 1}(A^\bullet , B^\bullet )$.

5. in particular, we obtain a canonical isomorphism

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{B})}(A^\bullet , B^\bullet ) \longrightarrow H^0(\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})}(A^\bullet , B^\bullet ))$

and the homotopy category of $\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})$ is equal to $K(\mathcal{B})$.

Given complexes $A^\bullet$, $B^\bullet$, $C^\bullet$ we define composition

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ m(B^\bullet , C^\bullet ) \times \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(A^\bullet , B^\bullet ) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^{n + m}(A^\bullet , C^\bullet )$

by composition $(g, f) \mapsto g \circ f$ in the graded category $\text{Gr}^{gr}(\mathcal{B})$, see Example 22.25.5. This defines a map of differential graded modules

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})}(B^\bullet , C^\bullet ) \otimes _ R \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})}(A^\bullet , B^\bullet ) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B})}(A^\bullet , C^\bullet )$

as required in Definition 22.26.1 because

\begin{align*} \text{d}(g \circ f) & = \text{d}_ C \circ g \circ f - (-1)^{n + m} g \circ f \circ \text{d}_ A \\ & = \left(\text{d}_ C \circ g - (-1)^ m g \circ \text{d}_ B\right) \circ f + (-1)^ m g \circ \left(\text{d}_ B \circ f - (-1)^ n f \circ \text{d}_ A\right) \\ & = \text{d}(g) \circ f + (-1)^ m g \circ \text{d}(f) \end{align*}

as desired.

Lemma 22.26.7. Let $F : \mathcal{B} \to \mathcal{B}'$ be an additive functor between additive categories. Then $F$ induces a functor of differential graded categories

$F : \text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B}) \to \text{Comp}^{dg}(\mathcal{B}')$

of Example 22.26.6 inducing the usual functors on the category of complexes and the homotopy categories.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$

Example 22.26.8 (Differential graded category of differential graded modules). Let $(A, \text{d})$ be a differential graded algebra over a ring $R$. We will construct a differential graded category $\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}$ over $R$ whose category of complexes is $\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})}$ and whose homotopy category is $K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})})$. As objects of $\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}$ we take the differential graded $A$-modules. Given differential graded $A$-modules $L$ and $M$ we set

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}}(L, M) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Mod}^{gr}_ A}(L, M) = \bigoplus \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(L, M)$

as a graded $R$-module where the right hand side is defined as in Example 22.25.6. In other words, the $n$th graded piece $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(L, M)$ is the $R$-module of right $A$-module maps homogeneous of degree $n$. For an element $f \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(L, M)$ we set

$\text{d}(f) = \text{d}_ M \circ f - (-1)^ n f \circ \text{d}_ L$

To make sense of this we think of $\text{d}_ M$ and $\text{d}_ L$ as graded $R$-module maps and we use composition of graded $R$-module maps. It is clear that $\text{d}(f)$ is homogeneous of degree $n + 1$ as a graded $R$-module map, and it is $A$-linear because

\begin{align*} \text{d}(f)(xa) & = \text{d}_ M(f(x) a) - (-1)^ n f (\text{d}_ L(xa)) \\ & = \text{d}_ M(f(x)) a + (-1)^{\deg (x) + n} f(x) \text{d}(a) - (-1)^ n f(\text{d}_ L(x)) a - (-1)^{n + \deg (x)} f(x) \text{d}(a) \\ & = \text{d}(f)(x) a \end{align*}

as desired (observe that this calculation would not work without the sign in the definition of our differential on $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits$). Similar formulae to those of Example 22.26.6 hold for the differential of $f$ in terms of components. The reader checks (in the same way as in Example 22.26.6) that

1. $\text{d}$ has square zero,

2. an element $f$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(L, M)$ has $\text{d}(f) = 0$ if and only if $f : L \to M[n]$ is a homomorphism of differential graded $A$-modules,

3. in particular, the category of complexes of $\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}$ is $\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})}$,

4. the homomorphism defined by $f$ as in (2) is homotopy equivalent to zero if and only if $f = \text{d}(g)$ for some $g \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^{n - 1}(L, M)$.

5. in particular, we obtain a canonical isomorphism

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})})}(L, M) \longrightarrow H^0(\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}}(L, M))$

and the homotopy category of $\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}$ is $K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})})$.

Given differential graded $A$-modules $K$, $L$, $M$ we define composition

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ m(L, M) \times \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^ n(K, L) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^{n + m}(K, M)$

by composition of homogeneous right $A$-module maps $(g, f) \mapsto g \circ f$. This defines a map of differential graded modules

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}}(L, M) \otimes _ R \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}}(K, L) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}}(K, M)$

as required in Definition 22.26.1 because

\begin{align*} \text{d}(g \circ f) & = \text{d}_ M \circ g \circ f - (-1)^{n + m} g \circ f \circ \text{d}_ K \\ & = \left(\text{d}_ M \circ g - (-1)^ m g \circ \text{d}_ L\right) \circ f + (-1)^ m g \circ \left(\text{d}_ L \circ f - (-1)^ n f \circ \text{d}_ K\right) \\ & = \text{d}(g) \circ f + (-1)^ m g \circ \text{d}(f) \end{align*}

as desired.

Lemma 22.26.9. Let $\varphi : (A, \text{d}) \to (E, \text{d})$ be a homomorphism of differential graded algebras. Then $\varphi$ induces a functor of differential graded categories

$F : \text{Mod}^{dg}_{(E, \text{d})} \longrightarrow \text{Mod}^{dg}_{(A, \text{d})}$

of Example 22.26.8 inducing obvious restriction functors on the categories of differential graded modules and homotopy categories.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$

Lemma 22.26.10. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a differential graded category over $R$. Let $x$ be an object of $\mathcal{A}$. Let

$(E, \text{d}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(x, x)$

be the differential graded $R$-algebra of endomorphisms of $x$. We obtain a functor

$\mathcal{A} \longrightarrow \text{Mod}^{dg}_{(E, \text{d})},\quad y \longmapsto \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(x, y)$

of differential graded categories by letting $E$ act on $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {A}(x, y)$ via composition in $\mathcal{A}$. This functor induces functors

$\text{Comp}(\mathcal{A}) \to \text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})} \quad \text{and}\quad K(\mathcal{A}) \to K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})})$

by an application of Lemma 22.26.5.

Proof. This lemma proves itself. $\square$

[1] This may be nonstandard terminology.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 09L4. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.