Lemma 75.11.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated algebraic space over $S$. Suppose that for every étale morphism $j : V \to W$ with $W \subset X$ quasi-compact open and $V$ affine the right derived functor

$\Phi : D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) \to D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ W))$

of the left exact functor $j_* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ V) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ W)$ fits into a commutative diagram

$\xymatrix{ D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ V)) \ar[d]_\Phi \ar[r]_{i_ V} & D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ V) \ar[d]^{Rj_*} \\ D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ W)) \ar[r]^{i_ W} & D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ W) }$

Then the functor (75.5.1.1)

$D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) \longrightarrow D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$

is an equivalence with quasi-inverse given by $RQ_ X$.

Proof. We first use the induction principle to prove $i_ X$ is fully faithful. More precisely, we will use Lemma 75.9.6. Let $(U \subset W, V \to W)$ be an elementary distinguished square with $V$ affine and $U, W$ quasi-compact open in $X$. Assume that $i_ U$ is fully faithful. We have to show that $i_ W$ is fully faithful. We may replace $X$ by $W$, i.e., we may assume $W = X$ (we do this just to simplify the notation – observe that the condition in the statement of the lemma is preserved under this operation).

Suppose that $A, B$ are objects of $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))$. We want to show that

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), i_ X(B))$

is bijective. Let $T = |X| \setminus |U|$.

Assume first $i_ X(B)$ is supported on $T$. In this case the map

$i_ X(B) \to Rj_{V, *}(i_ X(B)|_ V) = Rj_{V, *}(i_ V(B|_ V))$

is a quasi-isomorphism (Lemma 75.10.7). By assumption we have an isomorphism $i_ X(\Phi (B|_ V)) \to Rj_{V, *}(i_ V(B|_ V))$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. Moreover, $\Phi$ and ${-}|_ V$ are adjoint functors on the derived categories of quasi-coherent modules (by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.30.3). The adjunction map $B \to \Phi (B|_ V)$ becomes an isomorphism after applying $i_ X$, whence is an isomorphism in $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))$. Hence

\begin{align*} \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B) & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, \Phi (B|_ V)) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ V))}(A|_ V, B|_ V) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ V)}(i_ V(A|_ V), i_ V(B|_ V)) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), Rj_{V, *}(i_ V(B|_ V))) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), i_ X(B)) \end{align*}

as desired. Here we have used that $i_ V$ is fully faithful (Lemma 75.11.3).

In general, choose any complex $\mathcal{B}^\bullet$ of quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules representing $B$. Next, choose any quasi-isomorphism $s : \mathcal{B}^\bullet |_ U \to \mathcal{C}^\bullet$ of complexes of quasi-coherent modules on $U$. As $j_ U : U \to X$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated the functor $j_{U, *}$ transforms quasi-coherent modules into quasi-coherent modules (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.11.2). Thus there is a canonical map $\mathcal{B}^\bullet \to j_{U, *}(\mathcal{B}^\bullet |_ U) \to j_{U, *}\mathcal{C}^\bullet$ of complexes of quasi-coherent modules on $X$. Set $B'' = j_{U, *}\mathcal{C}^\bullet$ in $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))$ and choose a distinguished triangle

$B \to B'' \to B' \to B[1]$

in $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))$. Since the first arrow of the triangle restricts to an isomorphism over $U$ we see that $B'$ is supported on $T$. Hence in the diagram

$\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B'[-1]) \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), i_ X(B')[-1]) \ar[d] \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B) \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), i_ X(B)) \ar[d] \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B'') \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), i_ X(B'')) \ar[d] \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B') \ar[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), i_ X(B')) }$

we have exact columns and the top and bottom horizontal arrows are bijective. Finally, choose a complex $\mathcal{A}^\bullet$ of quasi-coherent modules representing $A$.

Let $\alpha : i_ X(A) \to i_ X(B)$ be a morphism between in $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. The restriction $\alpha |_ U$ comes from a morphism in $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U))$ as $i_ U$ is fully faithful. Hence there exists a choice of $s : \mathcal{B}^\bullet |_ U \to \mathcal{C}^\bullet$ as above such that $\alpha |_ U$ is represented by an actual map of complexes $\mathcal{A}^\bullet |_ U \to \mathcal{C}^\bullet$. This corresponds to a map of complexes $\mathcal{A} \to j_{U, *}\mathcal{C}^\bullet$. In other words, the image of $\alpha$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), i_ X(B''))$ comes from an element of $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B'')$. A diagram chase then shows that $\alpha$ comes from a morphism $A \to B$ in $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))$. Finally, suppose that $a : A \to B$ is a morphism of $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))$ which becomes zero in $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. After choosing $\mathcal{B}^\bullet$ suitably, we may assume $a$ is represented by a morphism of complexes $a^\bullet : \mathcal{A}^\bullet \to \mathcal{B}^\bullet$. Since $i_ U$ is fully faithul the restriction $a^\bullet |_ U$ is zero in $D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U))$. Thus we can choose $s$ such that $s \circ a^\bullet |_ U : \mathcal{A}^\bullet |_ U \to \mathcal{C}^\bullet$ is homotopic to zero. Applying the functor $j_{U, *}$ we conclude that $\mathcal{A}^\bullet \to j_{U, *}\mathcal{C}^\bullet$ is homotopic to zero. Thus $a$ maps to zero in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B'')$. Thus we may assume that $a$ is the image of an element of $b \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B'[-1])$. The image of $b$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(i_ X(A), i_ X(B')[-1])$ comes from a $\gamma \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(A, B''[-1])$ (as $a$ maps to zero in the group on the right). Since we've seen above the horizontal arrows are surjective, we see that $\gamma$ comes from a $c$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))}(A, B''[-1])$ which implies $a = 0$ as desired.

At this point we know that $i_ X$ is fully faithful for our original $X$. Since $RQ_ X$ is its right adjoint, we see that $RQ_ X \circ i_ X = \text{id}$ (Categories, Lemma 4.24.4). To finish the proof we show that for any $E$ in $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ the map $i_ X(RQ_ X(E)) \to E$ is an isomorphism. Choose a distinguished triangle

$i_ X(RQ_ X(E)) \to E \to E' \to i_ X(RQ_ X(E))[1]$

in $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. A formal argument using the above shows that $i_ X(RQ_ X(E')) = 0$. Thus it suffices to prove that for $E \in D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ the condition $i_ X(RQ_ X(E)) = 0$ implies that $E = 0$. Consider an étale morphism $j : V \to X$ with $V$ affine. By Lemmas 75.11.3 and 75.11.2 and our assumption we have

$Rj_*(E|_ V) = Rj_*(i_ V(RQ_ V(E|_ V))) = i_ X(\Phi (RQ_ V(E|_ V))) = i_ X(RQ_ X(Rj_*(E|_ V)))$

Choose a distinguished triangle

$E \to Rj_*(E|_ V) \to E' \to E[1]$

Apply $RQ_ X$ to get a distinguished triangle

$0 \to RQ_ X(Rj_*(E|_ V)) \to RQ_ X(E') \to 0[1]$

in other words the map in the middle is an isomorphism. Combined with the string of equalities above we find that our first distinguished triangle becomes a distinguished triangle

$E \to i_ X(RQ_ X(E')) \to E' \to E[1]$

where the middle morphism is the adjunction map. However, the composition $E \to E'$ is zero, hence $E \to i_ X(RQ_ X(E'))$ is zero by adjunction! Since this morphism is isomorphic to the morphism $E \to Rj_*(E|_ V)$ adjoint to $\text{id} : E|_ V \to E|_ V$ we conclude that $E|_ V$ is zero. Since this holds for all affine $V$ étale over $X$ we conclude $E$ is zero as desired. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 09TG. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.