Lemma 59.80.4. Let $X$ be an integral normal scheme with separably closed function field.

A separated étale morphism $U \to X$ is a disjoint union of open immersions.

All local rings of $X$ are strictly henselian.

Lemma 59.80.4. Let $X$ be an integral normal scheme with separably closed function field.

A separated étale morphism $U \to X$ is a disjoint union of open immersions.

All local rings of $X$ are strictly henselian.

**Proof.**
Let $R$ be a normal domain whose fraction field is separably algebraically closed. Let $R \to A$ be an étale ring map. Then $A \otimes _ R K$ is as a $K$-algebra a finite product $\prod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} K$ of copies of $K$. Let $e_ i$, $i = 1, \ldots , n$ be the corresponding idempotents of $A \otimes _ R K$. Since $A$ is normal (Algebra, Lemma 10.163.9) the idempotents $e_ i$ are in $A$ (Algebra, Lemma 10.37.12). Hence $A = \prod Ae_ i$ and we may assume $A \otimes _ R K = K$. Since $A \subset A \otimes _ R K = K$ (by flatness of $R \to A$ and since $R \subset K$) we conclude that $A$ is a domain. By the same argument we conclude that $A \otimes _ R A \subset (A \otimes _ R A) \otimes _ R K = K$. It follows that the map $A \otimes _ R A \to A$ is injective as well as surjective. Thus $R \to A$ defines an open immersion by Morphisms, Lemma 29.10.2 and Étale Morphisms, Theorem 41.14.1.

Let $f : U \to X$ be a separated étale morphism. Let $\eta \in X$ be the generic point and let $f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) = \{ \xi _ i\} _{i \in I}$. The result of the previous paragraph shows the following: For any affine open $U' \subset U$ whose image in $X$ is contained in an affine we have $U' = \coprod _{i \in I} U'_ i$ where $U'_ i$ is the set of point of $U'$ which are specializations of $\xi _ i$. Moreover, the morphism $U'_ i \to X$ is an open immersion. It follows that $U_ i = \overline{\{ \xi _ i\} }$ is an open and closed subscheme of $U$ and that $U_ i \to X$ is locally on the source an isomorphism. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.49.7 the fact that $U_ i \to X$ is separated, implies that $U_ i \to X$ is injective and we conclude that $U_ i \to X$ is an open immersion, i.e., (1) holds.

Part (2) follows from part (1) and the description of the strict henselization of $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ as the local ring at $\overline{x}$ on the étale site of $X$ (Lemma 59.33.1). It can also be proved directly, see Fundamental Groups, Lemma 58.12.2. $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)