The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

54.76 Schemes with strictly henselian local rings

In this section we collect some results about the étale cohomology of schemes whose local rings are strictly henselian. For example, here is a fun generalization of Lemma 54.54.1.

Lemma 54.76.1. Let $S$ be a scheme all of whose local rings are strictly henselian. Then for any abelian sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $S_{\acute{e}tale}$ we have $H^ i(S_{\acute{e}tale}, \mathcal{F}) = H^ i(S_{Zar}, \mathcal{F})$.

Proof. Let $\epsilon : S_{\acute{e}tale}\to S_{Zar}$ be the morphism of sites given by the inclusion functor. The Zariski sheaf $R^ p\epsilon _*\mathcal{F}$ is the sheaf associated to the presheaf $U \mapsto H^ p_{\acute{e}tale}(U, \mathcal{F})$. Thus the stalk at $x \in X$ is $\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits H^ p_{\acute{e}tale}(U, \mathcal{F}) = H^ p_{\acute{e}tale}(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}), \mathcal{G}_ x)$ where $\mathcal{G}_ x$ denotes the pullback of $\mathcal{F}$ to $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x})$, see Lemma 54.51.5. Thus the higher direct images of $R^ p\epsilon _*\mathcal{F}$ are zero by Lemma 54.54.1 and we conclude by the Leray spectral sequence. $\square$

Lemma 54.76.2. Let $S$ be an affine scheme such that (1) all points are closed, and (2) all residue fields are separably algebraically closed. Then for any abelian sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $S_{\acute{e}tale}$ we have $H^ i(S_{\acute{e}tale}, \mathcal{F}) = 0$ for $i > 0$.

Proof. Condition (1) implies that the underlying topological space of $S$ is profinite, see Algebra, Lemma 10.25.5. Thus the higher cohomology groups of an abelian sheaf on the topological space $S$ (i.e., Zariski cohomology) is trivial, see Cohomology, Lemma 20.23.3. The local rings are strictly henselian by Algebra, Lemma 10.148.10. Thus étale cohomology of $S$ is computed by Zariski cohomology by Lemma 54.76.1 and the proof is done. $\square$

The spectrum of an absolutely integrally closed ring is an example of a scheme all of whose local rings are strictly henselian, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.14.7. It turns out that normal domains with separably closed fraction fields have an even stronger property as explained in the following lemma.

Lemma 54.76.3. Let $X$ be an integral normal scheme with separably closed function field.

  1. A separated étale morphism $U \to X$ is a disjoint union of open immersions.

  2. All local rings of $X$ are strictly henselian.

Proof. Let $R$ be a normal domain whose fraction field is separably algebraically closed. Let $R \to A$ be an étale ring map. Then $A \otimes _ R K$ is as a $K$-algebra a finite product $\prod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} K$ of copies of $K$. Let $e_ i$, $i = 1, \ldots , n$ be the corresponding idempotents of $A \otimes _ R K$. Since $A$ is normal (Algebra, Lemma 10.157.9) the idempotents $e_ i$ are in $A$ (Algebra, Lemma 10.36.12). Hence $A = \prod Ae_ i$ and we may assume $A \otimes _ R K = K$. Since $A \subset A \otimes _ R K = K$ (by flatness of $R \to A$ and since $R \subset K$) we conclude that $A$ is a domain. By the same argument we conclude that $A \otimes _ R A \subset (A \otimes _ R A) \otimes _ R K = K$. It follows that the map $A \otimes _ R A \to A$ is injective as well as surjective. Thus $R \to A$ defines an open immersion by Morphisms, Lemma 28.10.2 and Étale Morphisms, Theorem 40.14.1.

Let $f : U \to X$ be a separated étale morphism. Let $\eta \in X$ be the generic point and let $f^{-1}(\{ \eta \} ) = \{ \xi _ i\} _{i \in I}$. The result of the previous paragraph shows the following: For any affine open $U' \subset U$ whose image in $X$ is contained in an affine we have $U' = \coprod _{i \in I} U'_ i$ where $U'_ i$ is the set of point of $U'$ which are specializations of $\xi _ i$. Moreover, the morphism $U'_ i \to X$ is an open immersion. It follows that $U_ i = \overline{\{ \xi _ i\} }$ is an open and closed subscheme of $U$ and that $U_ i \to X$ is locally on the source an isomorphism. By Morphisms, Lemma 28.47.7 the fact that $U_ i \to X$ is separated, implies that $U_ i \to X$ is injective and we conclude that $U_ i \to X$ is an open immersion, i.e., (1) holds.

Part (2) follows from part (1) and the description of the strict henselization of $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ as the local ring at $\overline{x}$ on the étale site of $X$ (Lemma 54.33.1). It can also be proved directly, see Fundamental Groups, Lemma 53.12.2. $\square$

Lemma 54.76.4. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes where $X$ is an integral normal scheme with separably closed function field. Then $R^ qf_*\underline{M} = 0$ for $q > 0$ and any abelian group $M$.

Proof. Recall that $R^ qf_*\underline{M}$ is the sheaf associated to the presheaf $V \mapsto H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(V \times _ Y X, M)$ on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$, see Lemma 54.51.6. If $V$ is affine, then $V \times _ Y X \to X$ is separated and étale. Hence $V \times _ Y X = \coprod U_ i$ is a disjoint union of open subschemes $U_ i$ of $X$, see Lemma 54.76.3. By Lemma 54.76.1 we see that $H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(U_ i, M)$ is equal to $H^ q_{Zar}(U_ i, M)$. This vanishes by Cohomology, Lemma 20.21.2. $\square$

Lemma 54.76.5. Let $X$ be an affine integral normal scheme with separably closed function field. Let $Z \subset X$ be a closed subscheme. Let $V \to Z$ be an étale morphism with $V$ affine. Then $V$ is a finite disjoint union of open subschemes of $Z$. If $V \to Z$ is surjective and finite étale, then $V \to Z$ has a section.

Proof. By Algebra, Lemma 10.141.10 we can lift $V$ to an affine scheme $U$ étale over $X$. Apply Lemma 54.76.3 to $U \to X$ to get the first statement.

The final statement is a consequence of the first. Let $V = \coprod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} V_ i$ be a finite decomposition into open and closed subschemes with $V_ i \to Z$ an open immersion. As $V \to Z$ is finite we see that $V_ i \to Z$ is also closed. Let $U_ i \subset Z$ be the image. Then we have a decomposition into open and closed subschemes

\[ Z = \coprod \nolimits _{(A, B)} \bigcap \nolimits _{i \in A} U_ i \cap \bigcap \nolimits _{i \in B} U_ i^ c \]

where the disjoint union is over $\{ 1, \ldots , n\} = A \amalg B$ where $A$ has at least one element. Each of the strata is contained in a single $U_ i$ and we find our section. $\square$

Lemma 54.76.6. Let $X$ be a normal integral affine scheme with separably closed function field. Let $Z \subset X$ be a closed subscheme. For any finite abelian group $M$ we have $H^1_{\acute{e}tale}(Z, \underline{M}) = 0$.

Proof. By Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.5.3 an element of $H^1_{\acute{e}tale}(Z, \underline{M})$ corresponds to a $\underline{M}$-torsor $\mathcal{F}$ on $Z_{\acute{e}tale}$. Such a torsor is clearly a finite locally constant sheaf. Hence $\mathcal{F}$ is representable by a scheme $V$ finite étale over $Z$, Lemma 54.63.4. Of course $V \to Z$ is surjective as a torsor is locally trivial. Since $V \to Z$ has a section by Lemma 54.76.5 we are done. $\square$

Lemma 54.76.7. Let $X$ be a normal integral affine scheme with separably closed function field. Let $Z \subset X$ be a closed subscheme. For any finite abelian group $M$ we have $H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Z, \underline{M}) = 0$ for $q \geq 1$.

Proof. We have seen that the result is true for $H^1$ in Lemma 54.76.6. We will prove the result for $q \geq 2$ by induction on $q$. Let $\xi \in H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Z, \underline{M})$.

Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Let $I \subset R$ be the set of elements $f \in R$ sch that $\xi |_{Z \cap D(f)} = 0$. All local rings of $Z$ are strictly henselian by Lemma 54.76.3 and Algebra, Lemma 10.150.16. Hence étale cohomology on $Z$ or open subschemes of $Z$ is equal to Zariski cohomology, see Lemma 54.76.1. In particular $\xi $ is Zariski locally trivial. It follows that for every prime $\mathfrak p$ of $R$ there exists an $f \in I$ with $f \not\in \mathfrak p$. Thus if we can show that $I$ is an ideal, then $1 \in I$ and we're done. It is clear that $f \in I$, $r \in R$ implies $rf \in I$. Thus we now assume that $f, g \in I$ and we show that $f + g \in I$. Note that

\[ D(f + g) \cap Z = D(f(f + g)) \cap Z \cup D(g(f + g)) \cap Z \]

By Mayer-Vietoris (Cohomology, Lemma 20.9.2 which applies as étale cohomology on open subschemes of $Z$ equals Zariski cohomology) we have an exact sequence

\[ \xymatrix{ H^{q - 1}_{\acute{e}tale}(D(fg(f + g)) \cap Z, \underline{M}) \ar[d] \\ H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(D(f + g) \cap Z, \underline{M}) \ar[d] \\ H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(D(f(f + g)) \cap Z, \underline{M}) \oplus H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(D(g(f + g)) \cap Z, \underline{M}) } \]

and the result follows as the first group is zero by induction. $\square$

Lemma 54.76.8. Let $X$ be an affine scheme.

  1. There exists an integral surjective morphism $X' \to X$ such that for every closed subscheme $Z' \subset X'$, every finite abelian group $M$, and every $q \geq 1$ we have $H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Z', \underline{M}) = 0$.

  2. For any closed subscheme $Z \subset X$, finite abelian group $M$, $q \geq 1$, and $\xi \in H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Z, \underline{M})$ there exists a finite surjective morphism $X' \to X$ of finite presentation such that $\xi $ pulls back to zero in $H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(X' \times _ X Z, \underline{M})$.

Proof. Write $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Write $A = \mathbf{Z}[x_ i]/J$ for some ideal $J$. Let $R$ be the integral closure of $\mathbf{Z}[x_ i]$ in an algebraic closure of the fraction field of $\mathbf{Z}[x_ i]$. Let $A' = R/JR$ and set $X' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A')$. This gives an example as in (1) by Lemma 54.76.7.

Proof of (2). Let $X' \to X$ be the integral surjective morphism we found above. Certainly, $\xi $ maps to zero in $H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(X' \times _ X Z, \underline{M})$. We may write $X'$ as a limit $X' = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X'_ i$ of schemes finite and of finite presentation over $X$; this is easy to do in our current affine case, but it is a special case of the more general Limits, Lemma 31.7.2. By Lemma 54.51.5 we see that $\xi $ maps to zero in $H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(X'_ i \times _ X Z, \underline{M})$ for some $i$ large enough. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0EZN. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.