Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 30.3.3. Let X be a scheme. Let \mathcal{L} be an invertible \mathcal{O}_ X-module. Assume that

  1. X is quasi-compact,

  2. for every quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals \mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X there exists an n \geq 1 such that H^1(X, \mathcal{I} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) = 0.

Then \mathcal{L} is ample.

Proof. This is proved in exactly the same way as Lemma 30.3.1. Let x \in X be a closed point. Let U \subset X be an affine open neighbourhood of x such that \mathcal{L}|_ U \cong \mathcal{O}_ U. Write U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) and let \mathfrak m \subset A be the maximal ideal corresponding to x. Set Z = X \setminus U and Z' = Z \cup \{ x\} . By Schemes, Lemma 26.12.4 there are quasi-coherent sheaves of ideals \mathcal{I}, resp. \mathcal{I}' cutting out the reduced closed subschemes Z, resp. Z'. Consider the short exact sequence

0 \to \mathcal{I}' \to \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{I}/\mathcal{I}' \to 0.

For every n \geq 1 we obtain a short exact sequence

0 \to \mathcal{I}' \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n} \to \mathcal{I} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n} \to \mathcal{I}/\mathcal{I}' \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n} \to 0.

By our assumption we may pick n such that H^1(X, \mathcal{I}' \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) = 0. Since x is a closed point of X and x \not\in Z we see that \mathcal{I}/\mathcal{I}' is supported at x. In fact, the restriction of \mathcal{I}/\mathcal{I'} to U corresponds to the A-module A/\mathfrak m. Since \mathcal{L} is trivial on U we see that the restriction of \mathcal{I}/\mathcal{I}' \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n} to U also corresponds to the A-module A/\mathfrak m. Hence we see that \Gamma (X, \mathcal{I}/\mathcal{I'} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) = A/\mathfrak m. By our choice of n we see there exists a global section s \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal{I} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) which maps to the element 1 \in A/\mathfrak m. Clearly we have x \in X_ s \subset U because s vanishes at points of Z. This implies that X_ s = D(f) where f \in A is the image of s in A \cong \Gamma (U, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}). In particular X_ s is affine.

Consider the union W = \bigcup X_ s over all s \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) for n \geq 1 such that X_ s is affine. Obviously W is open in X. By the arguments above every closed point of X is contained in W. The closed subset X \setminus W of X is also quasi-compact (see Topology, Lemma 5.12.3). Hence it has a closed point if it is nonempty (see Topology, Lemma 5.12.8). This would contradict the fact that all closed points are in W. Hence we conclude X = W. This means that \mathcal{L} is ample by Properties, Definition 28.26.1. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 8 comment(s) on Section 30.3: Vanishing of cohomology

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.