Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 30.17.2. Let R be a Noetherian ring. Let f : Y \to X be a morphism of schemes proper over R. Let \mathcal{L} be an invertible \mathcal{O}_ X-module. Assume f is finite and surjective. Then \mathcal{L} is ample if and only if f^*\mathcal{L} is ample.

Proof. The pullback of an ample invertible sheaf by a quasi-affine morphism is ample, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.37.7. This proves one of the implications as a finite morphism is affine by definition.

Assume that f^*\mathcal{L} is ample. Let P be the following property on coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules \mathcal{F}: there exists an n_0 such that H^ p(X, \mathcal{F} \otimes \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) = 0 for all n \geq n_0 and p > 0. We will prove that P holds for any coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{F}, which implies \mathcal{L} is ample by Lemma 30.17.1. We are going to apply Lemma 30.12.8. Thus we have to verify (1), (2) and (3) of that lemma for P. Property (1) follows from the long exact cohomology sequence associated to a short exact sequence of sheaves and the fact that tensoring with an invertible sheaf is an exact functor. Property (2) follows since H^ p(X, -) is an additive functor. To see (3) let Z \subset X be an integral closed subscheme with generic point \xi . Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on Y such that the support of f_*\mathcal{F} is equal to Z and (f_*\mathcal{F})_\xi is annihilated by \mathfrak m_\xi , see Lemma 30.13.1. We claim that taking \mathcal{G} = f_*\mathcal{F} works. We only have to verify part (3)(c) of Lemma 30.12.8. Hence assume that \mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X is a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals such that \mathcal{J}_\xi = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }. A finite morphism is affine hence by Lemma 30.13.2 we see that \mathcal{J}\mathcal{G} = f_*(f^{-1}\mathcal{J}\mathcal{F}). Also, as pointed out in the proof of Lemma 30.13.2 the sheaf f^{-1}\mathcal{J}\mathcal{F} is a coherent \mathcal{O}_ Y-module. As \mathcal{L} is ample we see from Lemma 30.17.1 that there exists an n_0 such that

H^ p(Y, f^{-1}\mathcal{J}\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ Y} f^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) = 0,

for n \geq n_0 and p > 0. Since f is finite, hence affine, we see that

\begin{align*} H^ p(X, \mathcal{J}\mathcal{G} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) & = H^ p(X, f_*(f^{-1}\mathcal{J}\mathcal{F}) \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) \\ & = H^ p(X, f_*(f^{-1}\mathcal{J}\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ Y} f^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes n})) \\ & = H^ p(Y, f^{-1}\mathcal{J}\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ Y} f^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}) = 0 \end{align*}

Here we have used the projection formula (Cohomology, Lemma 20.54.2) and Lemma 30.2.4. Hence the quasi-coherent subsheaf \mathcal{G}' = \mathcal{J}\mathcal{G} satisfies P. This verifies property (3)(c) of Lemma 30.12.8 as desired. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #2725 by Ariyan Javanpeykar on

This is closely related to EGA II, Corollaire 6.6.3. But some of the conditions are unclear. Johan, can you verify?

Comment #2851 by on

Yeah, it is related but it is different enough that it wouldn't be the correct reference.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.