Let $A \to B$ be a ring map. We say the Dedekind different is defined if $A$ is Noetherian, $A \to B$ is finite, any nonzerodivisor on $A$ is a nonzerodivisor on $B$, and $K \to L$ is étale where $K = Q(A)$ and $L = B \otimes _ A K$. Then $K \subset L$ is finite étale and
is the Dedekind complementary module. In this situation the Dedekind different is
viewed as a $B$-submodule of $L$. By Lemma 49.8.1 the Dedekind different is an ideal of $B$ either if $A$ is normal or if $B$ is flat over $A$.
Lemma 49.8.1. Assume the Dedekind different of $A \to B$ is defined. Consider the statements
$A \to B$ is flat,
$A$ is a normal ring,
$\text{Trace}_{L/K}(B) \subset A$,
$1 \in \mathcal{L}_{B/A}$, and
the Dedekind different $\mathfrak {D}_{B/A}$ is an ideal of $B$.
Then we have (1) $\Rightarrow $ (3), (2) $\Rightarrow $ (3), (3) $\Leftrightarrow $ (4), and (4) $\Rightarrow $ (5).
Proof. The equivalence of (3) and (4) and the implication (4) $\Rightarrow $ (5) are immediate.
If $A \to B$ is flat, then we see that $\text{Trace}_{B/A} : B \to A$ is defined and that $\text{Trace}_{L/K}$ is the base change. Hence (3) holds.
If $A$ is normal, then $A$ is a finite product of normal domains, hence we reduce to the case of a normal domain. Then $K$ is the fraction field of $A$ and $L = \prod L_ i$ is a finite product of finite separable field extensions of $K$. Then $\text{Trace}_{L/K}(b) = \sum \text{Trace}_{L_ i/K}(b_ i)$ where $b_ i \in L_ i$ is the image of $b$. Since $b$ is integral over $A$ as $B$ is finite over $A$, these traces are in $A$. This is true because the minimal polynomial of $b_ i$ over $K$ has coefficients in $A$ (Algebra, Lemma 10.38.6) and because $\text{Trace}_{L_ i/K}(b_ i)$ is an integer multiple of one of these coefficients (Fields, Lemma 9.20.3). $\square$
Lemma 49.8.2. If the Dedekind different of $A \to B$ is defined, then there is a canonical isomorphism $\mathcal{L}_{B/A} \to \omega _{B/A}$.
Proof. Recall that $\omega _{B/A} = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(B, A)$ as $A \to B$ is finite. We send $x \in \mathcal{L}_{B/A}$ to the map $b \mapsto \text{Trace}_{L/K}(bx)$. Conversely, given an $A$-linear map $\varphi : B \to A$ we obtain a $K$-linear map $\varphi _ K : L \to K$. Since $K \to L$ is finite étale, we see that the trace pairing is nondegenerate (Lemma 49.3.1) and hence there exists a $x \in L$ such that $\varphi _ K(y) = \text{Trace}_{L/K}(xy)$ for all $y \in L$. Then $x \in \mathcal{L}_{B/A}$ maps to $\varphi $ in $\omega _{B/A}$. $\square$
Lemma 49.8.3. If the Dedekind different of $A \to B$ is defined and $A \to B$ is flat, then
the canonical isomorphism $\mathcal{L}_{B/A} \to \omega _{B/A}$ sends $1 \in \mathcal{L}_{B/A}$ to the trace element $\tau _{B/A} \in \omega _{B/A}$, and
the Dedekind different is $\mathfrak {D}_{B/A} = \{ b \in B \mid b\omega _{B/A} \subset B\tau _{B/A}\} $.
Proof. The first assertion follows from the proof of Lemma 49.8.1 and Lemma 49.4.3. The second assertion is immediate from the first and the definitions. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)