Lemma 32.22.8. Notation and assumptions as in Lemma 32.22.4. If f is proper, then there exists an i_3 \geq i_0 such that for i \geq i_3 we have f_ i is proper.
Proof. By the discussion in Remark 32.22.5 the choice of i_1 and W fitting into a diagram as in (32.22.2.1) is immaterial for the truth of the lemma. Thus we choose W as follows. First we choose a closed immersion X \to X' with X' \to S proper and of finite presentation, see Lemma 32.13.2. Then we choose an i_3 \geq i_2 and a proper morphism W \to Y_{i_3} such that X' = Y \times _{Y_{i_3}} W. This is possible because Y = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq i_2} Y_ i and Lemmas 32.10.1 and 32.13.1. With this choice of W it is immediate from the construction that for i \geq i_3 the scheme X_ i is a closed subscheme of Y_ i \times _{Y_{i_3}} W \subset S_ i \times _{S_{i_3}} W and hence proper over Y_ i. \square
Comments (0)