Lemma 99.16.10. In Situation 99.16.3 assume that $S$ is a locally Noetherian scheme and $B \to S$ is locally of finite presentation. Let $k$ be a finite type field over $S$ and let $x_0 = (\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k), g_0, E_0)$ be an object of $\mathcal{X} = \mathcal{C}\! \mathit{omplexes}_{X/B}$ over $k$. Then the spaces $T\mathcal{F}_{\mathcal{X}, k, x_0}$ and $\text{Inf}(\mathcal{F}_{\mathcal{X}, k, x_0})$ (Artin's Axioms, Section 98.8) are finite dimensional.
Proof. Observe that by Lemma 99.16.9 our stack in groupoids $\mathcal{X}$ satisfies property (RS*) defined in Artin's Axioms, Section 98.18. In particular $\mathcal{X}$ satisfies (RS). Hence all associated predeformation categories are deformation categories (Artin's Axioms, Lemma 98.6.1) and the statement makes sense.
In this paragraph we show that we can reduce to the case $B = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$. Set $X_0 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \times _{g_0, B} X$ and denote $\mathcal{X}_0 = \mathcal{C}\! \mathit{omplexes}_{X_0/k}$. In Remark 99.16.7 we have seen that $\mathcal{X}_0$ is the $2$-fibre product of $\mathcal{X}$ with $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ over $B$ as categories fibred in groupoids over $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. Thus by Artin's Axioms, Lemma 98.8.2 we reduce to proving that $B$, $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$, and $\mathcal{X}_0$ have finite dimensional tangent spaces and infinitesimal automorphism spaces. The tangent space of $B$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ are finite dimensional by Artin's Axioms, Lemma 98.8.1 and of course these have vanishing $\text{Inf}$. Thus it suffices to deal with $\mathcal{X}_0$.
Let $k[\epsilon ]$ be the dual numbers over $k$. Let $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k[\epsilon ]) \to B$ be the composition of $g_0 : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to B$ and the morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k[\epsilon ]) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ coming from the inclusion $k \to k[\epsilon ]$. Set $X_0 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \times _ B X$ and $X_\epsilon = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k[\epsilon ]) \times _ B X$. Observe that $X_\epsilon $ is a first order thickening of $X_0$ flat over the first order thickening $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k[\epsilon ])$. Observe that $X_0$ and $X_\epsilon $ give rise to canonically equivalent small étale topoi, see More on Morphisms of Spaces, Section 76.9. By More on Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 76.54.4 we see that $T\mathcal{F}_{\mathcal{X}_0, k, x_0}$ is the set of isomorphism classes of lifts of $E_0$ to $X_\epsilon $ in the sense of Deformation Theory, Lemma 91.16.7. We conclude that
Here we have used the identification $\epsilon k[\epsilon ] \cong k$ of $k[\epsilon ]$-modules. Using Deformation Theory, Lemma 91.16.7 once more we see that there is a surjection
of $k$-vector spaces. As $E_0$ is pseudo-coherent it lies in $D^-_{\textit{Coh}}(\mathcal{O}_{X_0})$ by Derived Categories of Spaces, Lemma 75.13.7. Since $E_0$ locally has finite tor dimension and $X_0$ is quasi-compact we see $E_0 \in D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(\mathcal{O}_{X_0})$. Thus the $\mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits $s above are finite dimensional $k$-vector spaces by Derived Categories of Spaces, Lemma 75.8.4. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (2)
Comment #2690 by Emanuel Reinecke on
Comment #2838 by Johan on
There are also: