Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

The Stacks project

Lemma 72.14.3. Let k be a field. Let X be a proper algebraic space over k.

  1. A = H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) is a finite dimensional k-algebra,

  2. A = \prod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} A_ i is a product of Artinian local k-algebras, one factor for each connected component of |X|,

  3. if X is reduced, then A = \prod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} k_ i is a product of fields, each a finite extension of k,

  4. if X is geometrically reduced, then k_ i is finite separable over k,

  5. if X is geometrically connected, then A is geometrically irreducible over k,

  6. if X is geometrically irreducible, then A is geometrically irreducible over k,

  7. if X is geometrically reduced and connected, then A = k, and

  8. if X is geometrically integral, then A = k.

Proof. By Cohomology of Spaces, Lemma 69.20.3 we see that A = H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) is a finite dimensional k-algebra. This proves (1).

Then A is a product of local rings by Algebra, Lemma 10.53.2 and Algebra, Proposition 10.60.7. If X = Y \amalg Z with Y and Z open subspaces of X, then we obtain an idempotent e \in A by taking the section of \mathcal{O}_ X which is 1 on Y and 0 on Z. Conversely, if e \in A is an idempotent, then we get a corresponding decomposition of |X|. Finally, as |X| is a Noetherian topological space (by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.28.6 and Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.24.2) its connected components are open. Hence the connected components of |X| correspond 1-to-1 with primitive idempotents of A. This proves (2).

If X is reduced, then A is reduced (Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.21.4). Hence the local rings A_ i = k_ i are reduced and therefore fields (for example by Algebra, Lemma 10.25.1). This proves (3).

If X is geometrically reduced, then same thing is true for A \otimes _ k \overline{k} = H^0(X_{\overline{k}}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{\overline{k}}}) (see Cohomology of Spaces, Lemma 69.11.2 for equality). This implies that k_ i \otimes _ k \overline{k} is a product of fields and hence k_ i/k is separable for example by Algebra, Lemmas 10.44.2 and 10.44.4. This proves (4).

If X is geometrically connected, then A \otimes _ k \overline{k} = H^0(X_{\overline{k}}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{\overline{k}}}) is a zero dimensional local ring by part (2) and hence its spectrum has one point, in particular it is irreducible. Thus A is geometrically irreducible. This proves (5). Of course (5) implies (6).

If X is geometrically reduced and connected, then A = k_1 is a field and the extension k_1/k is finite separable and geometrically irreducible. However, then k_1 \otimes _ k \overline{k} is a product of [k_1 : k] copies of \overline{k} and we conclude that k_1 = k. This proves (7). Of course (7) implies (8). \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.