The Stacks project

Lemma 108.9.4. Assume the geometric fibres of $X \to B$ are integral in addition to the other assumptions in this section. Then $\mathrm{Pic}_{X/B} \to B$ is separated.

Proof. Since $\mathrm{Pic}_{X/B} \to B$ is quasi-separated, it suffices to check the uniqueness part of the valuative criterion, see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.43.2. This immediately reduces to the following problem: given

  1. a valuation ring $R$ with fraction field $K$,

  2. an algebraic space $X$ proper and flat over $R$ with integral geometric fibre,

  3. an element $a \in \mathrm{Pic}_{X/R}(R)$ with $a|_{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)} = 0$,

then we have to prove $a = 0$. Applying Morphisms of Stacks, Lemma 101.25.6 to the surjective flat morphism $\mathcal{P}\! \mathit{ic}_{X/R} \to \mathrm{Pic}_{X/R}$ (surjective and flat by Lemma 108.9.1 and Morphisms of Stacks, Lemma 101.28.8) after replacing $R$ by an extension we may assume $a$ is given by an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module $\mathcal{L}$. Since $a|_{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)} = 0$ we find $\mathcal{L}_ K \cong \mathcal{O}_{X_ K}$ by Quot, Lemma 99.11.3.

Denote $f : X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ the structure morphism. Let $\eta , 0 \in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ be the generic and closed point. Consider the perfect complexes $K = Rf_*\mathcal{L}$ and $M = Rf_*(\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1})$ on $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$, see Derived Categories of Spaces, Lemma 75.25.4. Consider the functions $\beta _{K, i}, \beta _{M, i} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \to \mathbf{Z}$ of Derived Categories of Spaces, Lemma 75.26.1 associated to $K$ and $M$. Since the formation of $K$ amd $M$ commutes with base change (see lemma cited above) we find $\beta _{K, 0}(\eta ) = \beta _{M, 0}(\beta ) = 1$ by Spaces over Fields, Lemma 72.14.3 and our assumption on the fibres of $f$. By upper semi-continuity we find $\beta _{K, 0}(0) \geq 1$ and $\beta _{M, 0} \geq 1$. By Spaces over Fields, Lemma 72.14.4 we conclude that the restriction of $\mathcal{L}$ to the special fibre $X_0$ is trivial. In turn this gives $\beta _{K, 0}(0) = \beta _{M, 0} = 1$ as above. Then by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.75.5 we can represent $K$ by a complex of the form

\[ \ldots \to 0 \to R \to R^{\oplus \beta _{K, 1}(0)} \to R^{\oplus \beta _{K, 2}(0)} \to \ldots \]

Now $R \to R^{\oplus \beta _{K, 1}(0)}$ is zero because $\beta _{K, 0}(\eta ) = 1$. In other words $K = R \oplus \tau _{\geq 1}(K)$ in $D(R)$ where $\tau _{\geq 1}(K)$ has tor amplitude in $[1, b]$ for some $b \in \mathbf{Z}$. Hence there is a global section $s \in H^0(X, \mathcal{L})$ whose restriction $s_0$ to $X_0$ is nonvanishing (again because formation of $K$ commutes with base change). Then $s : \mathcal{O}_ X \to \mathcal{L}$ is a map of invertible sheaves whose restriction to $X_0$ is an isomorphism and hence is an isomorphism as desired. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0DNJ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.