The Stacks project

66.24 Local irreducibility

We have already defined the geometric number of branches of an algebraic space at a point in Properties of Spaces, Section 64.23. The number of branches of an algebraic space at a point can only be defined for decent algebraic spaces.

Lemma 66.24.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$ be a point. The following are equivalent

  1. for any elementary étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ has a unique minimal prime,

  2. for any elementary étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ there is a unique irreducible component of $U$ through $u$,

  3. for any elementary étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ is unibranch,

  4. the henselian local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^ h$ has a unique minimal prime.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) follows from the fact that irreducible components of $U$ passing through $u$ are in $1$-$1$ correspondence with minimal primes of the local ring of $U$ at $u$. The ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^ h$ is the henselization of $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$, see discussion following Definition 66.11.7. In particular (3) and (4) are equivalent by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.98.3. The equivalence of (2) and (3) follows from More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.33.2. $\square$

Definition 66.24.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$. We say that $X$ is unibranch at $x$ if the equivalent conditions of Lemma 66.24.1 hold. We say that $X$ is unibranch if $X$ is unibranch at every $x \in |X|$.

This is consistent with the definition for schemes (Properties, Definition 28.15.1).

Lemma 66.24.3. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$ be a point. Let $n \in \{ 1, 2, \ldots \} $ be an integer. The following are equivalent

  1. for any elementary étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ the number of minimal primes of the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ is $\leq n$ and for at least one choice of $(U, u)$ it is $n$,

  2. for any elementary étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ the number irreducible components of $U$ passing through $u$ is $\leq n$ and for at least one choice of $(U, u)$ it is $n$,

  3. for any elementary étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ the number of branches of $U$ at $u$ is $\leq n$ and for at least one choice of $(U, u)$ it is $n$,

  4. the number of minimal prime ideals of $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^ h$ is $n$.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) follows from the fact that irreducible components of $U$ passing through $u$ are in $1$-$1$ correspondence with minimal primes of the local ring of $U$ at $u$. The ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is the henselization of $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$, see discussion following Definition 66.11.7. In particular (3) and (4) are equivalent by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.98.3. The equivalence of (2) and (3) follows from More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.33.2. $\square$

Definition 66.24.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$. The number of branches of $X$ at $x$ is either $n \in \mathbf{N}$ if the equivalent conditions of Lemma 66.24.3 hold, or else $\infty $.


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0DQ5. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.