The Stacks project

66.25 Catenary algebraic spaces

This section extends the material in Properties, Section 28.11 and Morphisms, Section 29.17 to algebraic spaces.

Definition 66.25.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$. We say $X$ is catenary if $|X|$ is catenary (Topology, Definition 5.11.4).

If $X$ is representable, then this is equivalent to the corresponding notion for the scheme representing $X$.

Lemma 66.25.2. Let $S$ be a locally Noetherian and universally catenary scheme. Let $\delta : S \to \mathbf{Z}$ be a dimension function. Let $X$ be a decent algebraic space over $S$ such that the structure morphism $X \to S$ is locally of finite type. Let $\delta _ X : |X| \to \mathbf{Z}$ be the map sending $x$ to $\delta (f(x))$ plus the transcendence degree of $x/f(x)$. Then $\delta _ X$ is a dimension function on $|X|$.

Proof. Let $\varphi : U \to X$ be a surjective étale morphism where $U$ is a scheme. Then the similarly defined function $\delta _ U$ is a dimension function on $U$ by Morphisms, Lemma 29.51.3. On the other hand, by the definition of relative transcendence degree in (Morphisms of Spaces, Definition 65.33.1) we see that $\delta _ U(u) = \delta _ X(\varphi (u))$.

Let $x \leadsto x'$ be a specialization of points in $|X|$. by Lemma 66.12.2 we can find a specialization $u \leadsto u'$ of points of $U$ with $\varphi (u) = x$ and $\varphi (u') = x'$. Moreover, we see that $x = x'$ if and only if $u = u'$, see Lemma 66.12.1. Thus the fact that $\delta _ U$ is a dimension function implies that $\delta _ X$ is a dimension function, see Topology, Definition 5.20.1. $\square$

Lemma 66.25.3. Let $S$ be a locally Noetherian and universally catenary scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$ such that $X$ is decent and such that the structure morphism $X \to S$ is locally of finite type. Then $X$ is catenary.

Proof. The question is local on $S$ (use Topology, Lemma 5.11.5). Thus we may assume that $S$ has a dimension function, see Topology, Lemma 5.20.4. Then we conclude that $|X|$ has a dimension function by Lemma 66.25.2. Since $|X|$ is sober (Proposition 66.12.4) we conclude that $|X|$ is catenary by Topology, Lemma 5.20.2. $\square$

By Lemma 66.25.3 the following definition is compatible with the already existing notion for representable algebraic spaces.

Definition 66.25.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent and locally Noetherian algebraic space over $S$. We say $X$ is universally catenary if for every morphism $Y \to X$ of algebraic spaces which is locally of finite type and with $Y$ decent, the algebraic space $Y$ is catenary.

If $X$ is an algebraic space, then the condition “$X$ is decent and locally Noetherian” is equivalent to “$X$ is quasi-separated and locally Noetherian”. This is Lemma 66.14.1. Thus another way to understand the definition above is that $X$ is universally catenary if and only if $Y$ is catenary for all morphisms $Y \to X$ which are quasi-separated and locally of finite type.

Lemma 66.25.5. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a decent, locally Noetherian, and universally catenary algebraic space over $S$. Then any decent algebraic space locally of finite type over $X$ is universally catenary.

Proof. This is formal from the definitions and the fact that compositions of morphisms locally of finite type are locally of finite type (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 65.23.2). $\square$

Lemma 66.25.6. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : Y \to X$ be a surjective finite morphism of decent and locally Noetherian algebraic spaces. Let $\delta : |X| \to \mathbf{Z}$ be a function. If $\delta \circ |f|$ is a dimension function, then $\delta $ is a dimension function.

Proof. Let $x \mapsto x'$, $x \not= x'$ be a specialization in $|X|$. Choose $y \in |Y|$ with $|f|(y) = x$. Since $|f|$ is closed (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 65.45.9) we find a specialization $y \leadsto y'$ with $|f|(y') = x'$. Thus we conclude that $\delta (x) = \delta (|f|(y)) > \delta (|f|(y')) = \delta (x')$ (see Topology, Definition 5.20.1). If $x \leadsto x'$ is an immediate specialization, then $y \leadsto y'$ is an immediate specialization too: namely if $y \leadsto y'' \leadsto y'$, then $|f|(y'')$ must be either $x$ or $x'$ and there are no nontrivial specializations between points of fibres of $|f|$ by Lemma 66.18.10. $\square$

The discussion will be continued in More on Morphisms of Spaces, Section 74.32.


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0ED3. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.