Lemma 52.16.8. In Situation 52.16.1 let (\mathcal{F}_ n) be an object of \textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U). If (\mathcal{F}_ n) canonically extends to X, then
(\widetilde{H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n)}) is pro-isomorphic to an object (\mathcal{G}_ n) of \textit{Coh}(X, I \mathcal{O}_ X) unique up to unique isomorphism,
the restriction of (\mathcal{G}_ n) to U is isomorphic to (\mathcal{F}_ n), i.e., (\mathcal{F}_ n) extends to X,
the inverse system \{ H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n)\} satisfies the Mittag-Leffler condition, and
the module M in (52.16.6.1) is finite over the I-adic completion of A and the limit topology on M is the I-adic topology.
Proof.
The existence of (\mathcal{G}_ n) in (1) follows from Definition 52.16.7. The uniqueness of (\mathcal{G}_ n) in (1) follows from Lemma 52.15.3. Write \mathcal{G}_ n = \widetilde{M_ n}. Then \{ M_ n\} is an inverse system of finite A-modules with M_ n = M_{n + 1}/I^ n M_{n + 1}. By Definition 52.16.7 the inverse system \{ H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n)\} is pro-isomorphic to \{ M_ n\} . Hence we see that the inverse system \{ H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n)\} satisfies the Mittag-Leffler condition and that M = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits M_ n (as topological modules). Thus the properties of M in (4) follow from Algebra, Lemmas 10.98.2, 10.96.12, and 10.96.3. Since U is quasi-affine the canonical maps
\widetilde{H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n)}|_ U \to \mathcal{F}_ n
are isomorphisms (Properties, Lemma 28.18.2). We conclude that (\mathcal{G}_ n|_ U) and (\mathcal{F}_ n) are pro-isomorphic and hence isomorphic by Lemma 52.15.3.
\square
Comments (1)
Comment #9751 by Tiny on