Lemma 72.7.6. Let S be a scheme. Let X be a locally Noetherian integral algebraic space over S. If X is normal, then the map (72.7.5.1) \mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits (X) \to \text{Cl}(X) is injective.
Proof. Let \mathcal{L} be an invertible \mathcal{O}_ X-module whose associated Weil divisor class is trivial. Let s be a regular meromorphic section of \mathcal{L}. The assumption means that \text{div}_\mathcal {L}(s) = \text{div}(f) for some f \in R(X)^*. Then we see that t = f^{-1}s is a regular meromorphic section of \mathcal{L} with \text{div}_\mathcal {L}(t) = 0, see Lemma 72.7.3. We claim that t defines a trivialization of \mathcal{L}. The claim finishes the proof of the lemma. Our proof of the claim is a bit awkward as we don't yet have a lot of theory at our dispposal; we suggest the reader skip the proof.
We may check our claim étale locally. Let U \in X_{\acute{e}tale} be affine such that \mathcal{L}|_ U is trivial. Say s_ U \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal{L}|_ U) is a trivialization. By Properties, Lemma 28.7.5 we may also assume U is integral. Write U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) as the spectrum of a normal Noetherian domain A with fraction field K. We may write t|_ U = f s_ U for some element f of K, see Divisors on Spaces, Lemma 71.10.4 for example. Let \mathfrak p \subset A be a height one prime corresponding to a codimension 1 point u \in U which maps to a codimension 1 point \xi \in |X|. Choose a trivialization s_\xi of \mathcal{L}_\xi as in the beginning of this section. Choose a geometric point \overline{u} of U lying over u. Then
see Decent Spaces, Lemmas 68.11.9 and Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.22.1. The normality of X shows that all of these are discrete valuation rings. The trivializations s_ U and s_\xi differ by a unit as sections of \mathcal{L} pulled back to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{u}}). Write t = f_\xi s_\xi with f_\xi \in Q(\mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }^ h). We conclude that f_\xi and f differ by a unit in Q(\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{u}}). If Z \subset X denotes the prime divisor corresponding to \xi (Lemma 72.4.7), then 0 = \text{ord}_{Z, \mathcal{L}}(t) = \text{ord}_{\mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }^ h}(f_\xi ) and since \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }^ h is a discrete valuation ring we see that f_\xi is a unit. Thus f is a unit in \mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{u}} and hence in particular f \in A_\mathfrak p. This implies f \in A by Algebra, Lemma 10.157.6. We conclude that t \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal{L}). Repeating the argument with t^{-1} viewed as a meromorphic section of \mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1} finishes the proof. \square
Comments (0)