Theorem 80.14.9. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $B$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated algebraic space over $S$. Let $X \to B$ be a separated, finite type morphism. Then $X$ has a compactification over $B$.

[CLO]

**Proof.**
We first reduce to the Noetherian case. We strongly urge the reader to skip this paragraph. First, we may replace $S$ by $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})$. See Spaces, Section 64.16 and Properties of Spaces, Definition 65.3.1. There exists a closed immersion $X \to X'$ with $X' \to B$ of finite presentation and separated. See Limits of Spaces, Proposition 69.11.7. If we find a compactification of $X'$ over $B$, then taking the scheme theoretic closure of $X$ in this will give a compactification of $X$ over $B$. Thus we may assume $X \to B$ is separated and of finite presentation. We may write $B = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits B_ i$ as a directed limit of a system of Noetherian algebraic spaces of finite type over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})$ with affine transition morphisms. See Limits of Spaces, Proposition 69.8.1. We can choose an $i$ and a morphism $X_ i \to B_ i$ of finite presentation whose base change to $B$ is $X \to B$, see Limits of Spaces, Lemma 69.7.1. After increasing $i$ we may assume $X_ i \to B_ i$ is separated, see Limits of Spaces, Lemma 69.6.9. If we can find a compactification of $X_ i$ over $B_ i$, then the base change of this to $B$ will be a compactification of $X$ over $B$. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $B$ is of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ in addition to being quasi-compact and quasi-separated. Let $U \to X$ be an étale morphism of algebraic spaces such that $U$ has a compactification $Y$ over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})$. The morphism

is separated and quasi-finite by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.27.10 (the displayed morphism factors into an immersion hence is a monomorphism). Hence by Zariski's main theorem (More on Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 75.34.3) there is an open immersion of $U$ into an algebraic space $Y'$ finite over $B \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})} Y$. Then $Y' \to B$ is proper as the composition $Y' \to B \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})} Y \to B$ of two proper morphisms (use Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 66.45.9, 66.40.4, and 66.40.3). We conclude that $U$ has a compactification over $B$.

There is a dense open subspace $U \subset X$ which is a scheme. (Properties of Spaces, Proposition 65.13.3). In fact, we may choose $U$ to be an affine scheme (Properties, Lemmas 28.5.7 and 28.29.1). Thus $U$ has a compactification over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})$; this is easily shown directly but also follows from the theorem for schemes, see More on Flatness, Theorem 38.33.8. By the previous paragraph $U$ has a compactification over $B$. By Noetherian induction we can find a maximal dense open subspace $U \subset X$ which has a compactification over $B$. We will show that the assumption that $U \not= X$ leads to a contradiction. Namely, by Lemma 80.14.8 we can find a strictly larger open $U \subset W \subset X$ and a distinguished square $(U \subset W, f : V \to W)$ with $V$ affine and $U \times _ W V$ dense image in $U$. Since $V$ is affine, as before it has a compactification over $B$. Hence Lemma 80.14.7 applies to show that $W$ has a compactification over $B$ which is the desired contradiction. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)