Loading web-font TeX/Main/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 42.55.2. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be a scheme locally of finite type over S. Let \mathcal{C} be a locally free \mathcal{O}_ X-module of rank r. Consider the morphisms

X = \underline{\text{Proj}}_ X(\mathcal{O}_ X[T]) \xrightarrow {i} E = \underline{\text{Proj}}_ X(\text{Sym}^*(\mathcal{C})[T]) \xrightarrow {\pi } X

Then c_ t(i_*\mathcal{O}_ X) = 0 for t = 1, \ldots , r - 1 and in A^0(C \to E) we have

p^* \circ \pi _* \circ c_ r(i_*\mathcal{O}_ X) = (-1)^{r - 1}(r - 1)! j^*

where j : C \to E and p : C \to X are the inclusion and structure morphism of the vector bundle C = \underline{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}}(\text{Sym}^*(\mathcal{C})).

Proof. The canonical map \pi ^*\mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{O}_ E(1) vanishes exactly along i(X). Hence the Koszul complex on the map

\pi ^*\mathcal{C} \otimes \mathcal{O}_ E(-1) \to \mathcal{O}_ E

is a resolution of i_*\mathcal{O}_ X. In particular we see that i_*\mathcal{O}_ X is a perfect object of D(\mathcal{O}_ E) whose Chern classes are defined. The vanishing of c_ t(i_*\mathcal{O}_ X) for t = 1, \ldots , t - 1 follows from Lemma 42.55.1. This lemma also gives

c_ r(i_*\mathcal{O}_ X) = - (r - 1)! c_ r(\pi ^*\mathcal{C} \otimes \mathcal{O}_ E(-1))

On the other hand, by Lemma 42.43.3 we have

c_ r(\pi ^*\mathcal{C} \otimes \mathcal{O}_ E(-1)) = (-1)^ r c_ r(\pi ^*\mathcal{C}^\vee \otimes \mathcal{O}_ E(1))

and \pi ^*\mathcal{C}^\vee \otimes \mathcal{O}_ E(1) has a section s vanishing exactly along i(X).

After replacing X by a scheme locally of finite type over X, it suffices to prove that both sides of the equality have the same effect on an element \alpha \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _*(E). Since C \to X is a vector bundle, every cycle class on C is of the form p^*\beta for some \beta \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _*(X) (Lemma 42.36.3). Hence by Lemma 42.19.3 we can write \alpha = \pi ^*\beta + \gamma where \gamma is supported on E \setminus C. Using the equalities above it suffices to show that

p^*(\pi _*(c_ r(\pi ^*\mathcal{C}^\vee \otimes \mathcal{O}_ E(1)) \cap [W])) = j^*[W]

when W \subset E is an integral closed subscheme which is either (a) disjoint from C or (b) is of the form W = \pi ^{-1}Y for some integral closed subscheme Y \subset X. Using the section s and Lemma 42.44.1 we find in case (a) c_ r(\pi ^*\mathcal{C}^\vee \otimes \mathcal{O}_ E(1)) \cap [W] = 0 and in case (b) c_ r(\pi ^*\mathcal{C}^\vee \otimes \mathcal{O}_ E(1)) \cap [W] = [i(Y)]. The result follows easily from this; details omitted. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.