Lemma 57.18.1. Let $R$ be a countable Noetherian ring. Then the category of schemes of finite type over $R$ is countable.

## 57.18 Countability

In this section we prove some elementary lemmas about countability of certain sets. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category. In this section we will say that $\mathcal{C}$ is *countable* if

for any $X, Y \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$ the set $\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(X, Y)$ is countable, and

the set of isomorphism classes of objects of $\mathcal{C}$ is countable.

**Proof.**
Omitted.
$\square$

Lemma 57.18.2. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a countable abelian category. Then $D^ b(\mathcal{A})$ is countable.

**Proof.**
It suffices to prove the statement for $D(\mathcal{A})$ as the others are full subcategories of this one. Since every object in $D(\mathcal{A})$ is a complex of objects of $\mathcal{A}$ it is immediate that the set of isomorphism classes of objects of $D^ b(\mathcal{A})$ is countable. Moreover, for bounded complexes $A^\bullet $ and $B^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{A}$ it is clear that $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K^ b(\mathcal{A})}(A^\bullet , B^\bullet )$ is countable. We have

by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.11.6. Thus this is a countable set as a countable colimit of $\square$

Lemma 57.18.3. Let $X$ be a scheme of finite type over a countable Noetherian ring. Then the categories $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and $D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ are countable.

**Proof.**
Observe that $X$ is Noetherian by Morphisms, Lemma 29.15.6. Hence $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ is a full subcategory of $D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ by Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.11.6. Thus it suffices to prove the result for $D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. Recall that $D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X) = D^ b(\textit{Coh}(\mathcal{O}_ X))$ by Derived Categories of Schemes, Proposition 36.11.2. Hence by Lemma 57.18.2 it suffices to prove that $\textit{Coh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ is countable. This we omit.
$\square$

Lemma 57.18.4. Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $S$ be a finite type scheme over $K$. Let $X \to S$ and $Y \to S$ be finite type morphisms. There exists a countable set $I$ and for $i \in I$ a pair $(S_ i \to S, h_ i)$ with the following properties

$S_ i \to S$ is a morphism of finite type, set $X_ i = X \times _ S S_ i$ and $Y_ i = Y \times _ S S_ i$,

$h_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i$ is an isomorphism over $S_ i$, and

for any closed point $s \in S(K)$ if $X_ s \cong Y_ s$ over $K = \kappa (s)$ then $s$ is in the image of $S_ i \to S$ for some $i$.

**Proof.**
The field $K$ is the filtered union of its countable subfields. Dually, $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)$ is the cofiltered limit of the spectra of the countable subfields of $K$. Hence Limits, Lemma 32.10.1 guarantees that we can find a countable subfield $k$ and morphisms $X_0 \to S_0$ and $Y_0 \to S_0$ of schemes of finite type over $k$ such that $X \to S$ and $Y \to S$ are the base changes of these.

By Lemma 57.18.1 there is a countable set $I$ and pairs $(S_{0, i} \to S_0, h_{0, i})$ such that

$S_{0, i} \to S_0$ is a morphism of finite type, set $X_{0, i} = X_0 \times _{S_0} S_{0, i}$ and $Y_{0, i} = Y_0 \times _{S_0} S_{0, i}$,

$h_{0, i} : X_{0, i} \to Y_{0, i}$ is an isomorphism over $S_{0, i}$.

such that every pair $(T \to S_0, h_ T)$ with $T \to S_0$ of finite type and $h_ T : X_0 \times _{S_0} T \to Y_0 \times _{S_0} T$ an isomorphism is isomorphic to one of these. Denote $(S_ i \to S, h_ i)$ the base change of $(S_{0, i} \to S_0, h_{0, i})$ by $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$. We claim this works.

Let $s \in S(K)$ and let $h_ s : X_ s \to Y_ s$ be an isomorphism over $K = \kappa (s)$. We can write $K$ as the filtered union of its finitely generated $k$-subalgebras. Hence by Limits, Proposition 32.6.1 and Lemma 32.10.1 we can find such a finitely generated $k$-subalgebra $K \supset A \supset k$ such that

there is a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[d]_ s \ar[r] & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar[d]^{s'} \\ S \ar[r] & S_0} \]for some morphism $s' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \to S_0$ over $k$,

$h_ s$ is the base change of an isomorphism $h_{s'} : X_0 \times _{S_0, s'} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \to X_0 \times _{S_0, s'} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ over $A$.

Of course, then $(s' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \to S_0, h_{s'})$ is isomorphic to the pair $(S_{0, i} \to S_0, h_{0, i})$ for some $i \in I$. This concludes the proof because the commutative diagram in (1) shows that $s$ is in the image of the base change of $s'$ to $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)$. $\square$

Lemma 57.18.5. Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field. There exists a countable set $I$ and for $i \in I$ a pair $(S_ i/K, X_ i \to S_ i, Y_ i \to S_ i, M_ i)$ with the following properties

$S_ i$ is a scheme of finite type over $K$,

$X_ i \to S_ i$ and $Y_ i \to S_ i$ are proper smooth morphisms of schemes,

$M_ i \in D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{X_ i \times _{S_ i} Y_ i})$ is the Fourier-Mukai kernel of a relative equivalence from $X_ i$ to $Y_ i$ over $S_ i$, and

for any smooth proper schemes $X$ and $Y$ over $K$ such that there is a $K$-linear exact equivalence $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$ there exists an $i \in I$ and a $s \in S_ i(K)$ such that $X \cong (X_ i)_ s$ and $Y \cong (Y_ i)_ s$.

**Proof.**
Choose a countable subfield $k \subset K$ for example the prime field. By Lemmas 57.18.1 and 57.18.3 there exists a countable set of isomorphism classes of systems over $k$ satisfying parts (1), (2), (3) of the lemma. Thus we can choose a countable set $I$ and for each $i \in I$ such a system

over $k$ such that each isomorphism class occurs at least once. Denote $(S_ i/K, X_ i \to S_ i, Y_ i \to S_ i, M_ i)$ the base change of the displayed system to $K$. This system has properties (1), (2), (3), see Lemma 57.16.3. Let us prove property (4).

Consider smooth proper schemes $X$ and $Y$ over $K$ such that there is a $K$-linear exact equivalence $F : D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$. By Proposition 57.14.4 we may assume that there exists an object $M \in D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y})$ such that $F = \Phi _ M$ is the corresponding Fourier-Mukai functor. By Lemma 57.9.9 there is an $M'$ in $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{Y \times X})$ such that $\Phi _{M'}$ is the right adjoint to $\Phi _ M$. Since $\Phi _ M$ is an equivalence, this means that $\Phi _{M'}$ is the quasi-inverse to $\Phi _ M$. By Lemma 57.9.9 we see that the Fourier-Mukai functors defined by the objects

in $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{X \times X})$ and

in $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{Y \times Y})$ are isomorphic to $\text{id} : D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and $\text{id} : D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ Y) \to D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$ Hence $A \cong \Delta _{X/K, *}\mathcal{O}_ X$ and $B \cong \Delta _{Y/K, *}\mathcal{O}_ Y$ by Lemma 57.14.5. Hence we see that $M$ is the Fourier-Mukai kernel of a relative equivalence from $X$ to $Y$ over $K$ by definition.

We can write $K$ as the filtered colimit of its finite type $k$-subalgebras $A \subset K$. By Limits, Lemma 32.10.1 we can find $X_0, Y_0$ of finite type over $A$ whose base changes to $K$ produces $X$ and $Y$. By Limits, Lemmas 32.13.1 and 32.8.9 after enlarging $A$ we may assume $X_0$ and $Y_0$ are smooth and proper over $A$. By Lemma 57.16.4 after enlarging $A$ we may assume $M$ is the pullback of some $M_0 \in D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_{X_0 \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)} Y_0})$ which is the Fourier-Mukai kernel of a relative equivalence from $X_0$ to $Y_0$ over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Thus we see that $(S_0/k, X_0 \to S_0, Y_0 \to S_0, M_0)$ is isomorphic to $(S_{0, i}/k, X_{0, i} \to S_{0, i}, Y_{0, i} \to S_{0, i}, M_{0, i})$ for some $i \in I$. Since $S_ i = S_{0, i} \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)$ we conclude that (4) is true with $s : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \to S_ i$ induced by the morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \cong S_{0, i}$ we get from $A \subset K$. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)