Lemma 103.18.1. Let \mathcal{X} be a Noetherian algebraic stack. Every quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}-module is the filtered colimit of its coherent submodules.
Proof. Let \mathcal{F} be a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}-module. If \mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H} \subset \mathcal{F} are coherent \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}-submodules then the image of \mathcal{G} \oplus \mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{F} is another coherent \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}-submodule which contains both of them, see Lemma 103.17.7. In this way we see that the system is directed. Hence it now suffices to show that \mathcal{F} can be written as a filtered colimit of coherent modules, as then we can take the images of these modules in \mathcal{F} to conclude there are enough of them.
Let U be an affine scheme and U \to \mathcal{X} a surjective smooth morphism (Properties of Stacks, Lemma 100.6.2). Set R = U \times _\mathcal {X} U so that \mathcal{X} = [U/R] as in Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.16.2. By Lemma 103.17.8 we have \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) = \mathit{QCoh}(U, R, s, t, c) and \textit{Coh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) = \textit{Coh}(U, R, s, t, c). In this way we reduce to the problem of proving the corresponding thing for \mathit{QCoh}(U, R, s, t, c). This is Groupoids in Spaces, Lemma 78.13.4; we check its assumptions in the next paragraph.
We urge the reader to skip the rest of the proof. The affine scheme U is Noetherian; this follows from our definition of \mathcal{X} being locally Noetherian, see Properties of Stacks, Definition 100.7.2 and Remark 100.7.3. The projection morphisms s, t : R \to U are smooth (see reference given above) and quasi-separated and quasi-compact (Morphisms of Stacks, Lemma 101.7.8). In particular, R is a quasi-compact and quasi-separated algebraic space smooth over U and hence Noetherian (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.28.6). \square
Comments (0)