The Stacks project

See for example [Remark 18.30 (2)., GWII].

Lemma 29.37.18. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$. If $X$ is étale over $S$ and $Y$ is unramified over $S$, then $f$ is étale.

Proof. Consider the factorization $X \to X \times _ S Y \to Y$, where the first arrow is given by $\text{id}_ X$ and $f$ and the second arrow is the projection. We claim both arrows are étale and hence $f$ is étale by Lemma 29.37.3. Namely, the projection is étale as it is the base change of $X \to S$, see Lemma 29.37.4. The first arrow is the base change of the diagonal morphism $Y \to Y \times _ S Y$ because the square

\[ \xymatrix{ X \ar[d] \ar[r] & X \times _ S Y \ar[d] \\ Y \ar[r] & Y \times _ S Y } \]

is cartesian. The diagonal $Y \to Y \times _ S Y$ is an open immersion by Lemma 29.36.13. The base change of an open immersion is an open immersion (Schemes, Lemma 26.18.2) and an open immersion is étale (Lemma 29.37.9). $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 3 comment(s) on Section 29.37: Étale morphisms

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0HB1. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.