The Stacks project

Lemma 110.10.1. Let $I \subset R$ be an ideal of a ring. Let $M$ be an $I$-adically complete $R$-module and let $N \subset M$ be a submodule. The following are equivalent

  1. $N$ is closed in $M$,

  2. $N = \bigcap _{n \geq 1} (N + I^ n M)$,

  3. $M/N$ is $I$-adically complete

If $I$ is finitely generated, these conditions imply that $N$ is $I$-adically complete.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) follows from Formal Spaces, Lemma 87.4.2. The equivalence of (2) and (3) is Algebra, Lemma 10.96.10. Assume $I$ is finitely generated and (1) holds. Let $N^\wedge $ be the $I$-adic completion of $N$. Since $M$ is $I$-adically complete we have a factorization

\[ N \to N^\wedge \to M \]

of the inclusion map. Since $N^\wedge \to M$ is continuous and $N$ is dense in $N^\wedge $ and $N$ is closed in $M$, we see that $N^\wedge \to M$ factors through $N$. Thus $N^\wedge = N \oplus C$ for some $A$-module $C$. Thus $N$ is a direct summand of the $I$-adically complete module $N^\wedge $, see Algebra, Lemma 10.96.3 (this is where we use that $I$ is finitely generated), and hence $N$ is $I$-adically complete. $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 110.10: The category of complete modules is not abelian

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0HB3. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.