The Stacks project

30.12 Devissage of coherent sheaves

Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Consider an integral closed subscheme $i : Z \to X$. It is often convenient to consider coherent sheaves of the form $i_*\mathcal{G}$ where $\mathcal{G}$ is a coherent sheaf on $Z$. In particular we are interested in these sheaves when $\mathcal{G}$ is a torsion free rank $1$ sheaf. For example $\mathcal{G}$ could be a nonzero sheaf of ideals on $Z$, or even more specifically $\mathcal{G} = \mathcal{O}_ Z$.

Throughout this section we will use that a coherent sheaf is the same thing as a finite type quasi-coherent sheaf and that a quasi-coherent subquotient of a coherent sheaf is coherent, see Section 30.9. The support of a coherent sheaf is closed, see Modules, Lemma 17.9.6.

Lemma 30.12.1. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $X$. Suppose that $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}) = Z \cup Z'$ with $Z$, $Z'$ closed. Then there exists a short exact sequence of coherent sheaves

\[ 0 \to \mathcal{G}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G} \to 0 \]

with $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}') \subset Z'$ and $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}) \subset Z$.

Proof. Let $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ be the sheaf of ideals defining the reduced induced closed subscheme structure on $Z$, see Schemes, Lemma 26.12.4. Consider the subsheaves $\mathcal{G}'_ n = \mathcal{I}^ n\mathcal{F}$ and the quotients $\mathcal{G}_ n = \mathcal{F}/\mathcal{I}^ n\mathcal{F}$. For each $n$ we have a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to \mathcal{G}'_ n \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}_ n \to 0 \]

For every point $x$ of $Z' \setminus Z$ we have $\mathcal{I}_ x = \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ and hence $\mathcal{G}_{n, x} = 0$. Thus we see that $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}_ n) \subset Z$. Note that $X \setminus Z'$ is a Noetherian scheme. Hence by Lemma 30.10.2 there exists an $n$ such that $\mathcal{G}'_ n|_{X \setminus Z'} = \mathcal{I}^ n\mathcal{F}|_{X \setminus Z'} = 0$. For such an $n$ we see that $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}'_ n) \subset Z'$. Thus setting $\mathcal{G}' = \mathcal{G}'_ n$ and $\mathcal{G} = \mathcal{G}_ n$ works. $\square$

Lemma 30.12.2. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $i : Z \to X$ be an integral closed subscheme. Let $\xi \in Z$ be the generic point. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $X$. Assume that $\mathcal{F}_\xi $ is annihilated by $\mathfrak m_\xi $. Then there exists an integer $r \geq 0$ and a sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ Z$ and an injective map of coherent sheaves

\[ i_*\left(\mathcal{I}^{\oplus r}\right) \to \mathcal{F} \]

which is an isomorphism in a neighbourhood of $\xi $.

Proof. Let $\mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ be the ideal sheaf of $Z$. Let $\mathcal{F}' \subset \mathcal{F}$ be the subsheaf of local sections of $\mathcal{F}$ which are annihilated by $\mathcal{J}$. It is a quasi-coherent sheaf by Properties, Lemma 28.24.2. Moreover, $\mathcal{F}'_\xi = \mathcal{F}_\xi $ because $\mathcal{J}_\xi = \mathfrak m_\xi $ and part (3) of Properties, Lemma 28.24.2. By Lemma 30.9.5 we see that $\mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F}$ induces an isomorphism in a neighbourhood of $\xi $. Hence we may replace $\mathcal{F}$ by $\mathcal{F}'$ and assume that $\mathcal{F}$ is annihilated by $\mathcal{J}$.

Assume $\mathcal{J}\mathcal{F} = 0$. By Lemma 30.9.8 we can write $\mathcal{F} = i_*\mathcal{G}$ for some coherent sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $Z$. Suppose we can find a morphism $\mathcal{I}^{\oplus r} \to \mathcal{G}$ which is an isomorphism in a neighbourhood of the generic point $\xi $ of $Z$. Then applying $i_*$ (which is left exact) we get the result of the lemma. Hence we have reduced to the case $X = Z$.

Suppose $Z = X$ is an integral Noetherian scheme with generic point $\xi $. Note that $\mathcal{O}_{X, \xi } = \kappa (\xi )$ is the function field of $X$ in this case. Since $\mathcal{F}_\xi $ is a finite $\mathcal{O}_\xi $-module we see that $r = \dim _{\kappa (\xi )} \mathcal{F}_\xi $ is finite. Hence the sheaves $\mathcal{O}_ X^{\oplus r}$ and $\mathcal{F}$ have isomorphic stalks at $\xi $. By Lemma 30.9.6 there exists a nonempty open $U \subset X$ and a morphism $\psi : \mathcal{O}_ X^{\oplus r}|_ U \to \mathcal{F}|_ U$ which is an isomorphism at $\xi $, and hence an isomorphism in a neighbourhood of $\xi $ by Lemma 30.9.5. By Schemes, Lemma 26.12.4 there exists a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ whose associated closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ is the complement of $U$. By Lemma 30.10.4 there exists an $n \geq 0$ and a morphism $\mathcal{I}^ n(\mathcal{O}_ X^{\oplus r}) \to \mathcal{F}$ which recovers our $\psi $ over $U$. Since $\mathcal{I}^ n(\mathcal{O}_ X^{\oplus r}) = (\mathcal{I}^ n)^{\oplus r}$ we get a map as in the lemma. It is injective because $X$ is integral and it is injective at the generic point of $X$ (easy proof omitted). $\square$

Lemma 30.12.3. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $X$. There exists a filtration

\[ 0 = \mathcal{F}_0 \subset \mathcal{F}_1 \subset \ldots \subset \mathcal{F}_ m = \mathcal{F} \]

by coherent subsheaves such that for each $j = 1, \ldots , m$ there exists an integral closed subscheme $Z_ j \subset X$ and a sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}_ j \subset \mathcal{O}_{Z_ j}$ such that

\[ \mathcal{F}_ j/\mathcal{F}_{j - 1} \cong (Z_ j \to X)_* \mathcal{I}_ j \]

Proof. Consider the collection

\[ \mathcal{T} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} Z \subset X \text{ closed such that there exists a coherent sheaf } \mathcal{F} \\ \text{ with } \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}) = Z \text{ for which the lemma is wrong} \end{matrix} \right\} \]

We are trying to show that $\mathcal{T}$ is empty. If not, then because $X$ is Noetherian we can choose a minimal element $Z \in \mathcal{T}$. This means that there exists a coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ whose support is $Z$ and for which the lemma does not hold. Clearly $Z \not= \emptyset $ since the only sheaf whose support is empty is the zero sheaf for which the lemma does hold (with $m = 0$).

If $Z$ is not irreducible, then we can write $Z = Z_1 \cup Z_2$ with $Z_1, Z_2$ closed and strictly smaller than $Z$. Then we can apply Lemma 30.12.1 to get a short exact sequence of coherent sheaves

\[ 0 \to \mathcal{G}_1 \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}_2 \to 0 \]

with $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}_ i) \subset Z_ i$. By minimality of $Z$ each of $\mathcal{G}_ i$ has a filtration as in the statement of the lemma. By considering the induced filtration on $\mathcal{F}$ we arrive at a contradiction. Hence we conclude that $Z$ is irreducible.

Suppose $Z$ is irreducible. Let $\mathcal{J}$ be the sheaf of ideals cutting out the reduced induced closed subscheme structure of $Z$, see Schemes, Lemma 26.12.4. By Lemma 30.10.2 we see there exists an $n \geq 0$ such that $\mathcal{J}^ n\mathcal{F} = 0$. Hence we obtain a filtration

\[ 0 = \mathcal{J}^ n\mathcal{F} \subset \mathcal{J}^{n - 1}\mathcal{F} \subset \ldots \subset \mathcal{J}\mathcal{F} \subset \mathcal{F} \]

each of whose successive subquotients is annihilated by $\mathcal{J}$. Hence if each of these subquotients has a filtration as in the statement of the lemma then also $\mathcal{F}$ does. In other words we may assume that $\mathcal{J}$ does annihilate $\mathcal{F}$.

In the case where $Z$ is irreducible and $\mathcal{J}\mathcal{F} = 0$ we can apply Lemma 30.12.2. This gives a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to i_*(\mathcal{I}^{\oplus r}) \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{Q} \to 0 \]

where $\mathcal{Q}$ is defined as the quotient. Since $\mathcal{Q}$ is zero in a neighbourhood of $\xi $ by the lemma just cited we see that the support of $\mathcal{Q}$ is strictly smaller than $Z$. Hence we see that $\mathcal{Q}$ has a filtration of the desired type by minimality of $Z$. But then clearly $\mathcal{F}$ does too, which is our final contradiction. $\square$

Lemma 30.12.4. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a property of coherent sheaves on $X$. Assume

  1. For any short exact sequence of coherent sheaves

    \[ 0 \to \mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}_2 \to 0 \]

    if $\mathcal{F}_ i$, $i = 1, 2$ have property $\mathcal{P}$ then so does $\mathcal{F}$.

  2. For every integral closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ and every quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ Z$ we have $\mathcal{P}$ for $i_*\mathcal{I}$.

Then property $\mathcal{P}$ holds for every coherent sheaf on $X$.

Proof. First note that if $\mathcal{F}$ is a coherent sheaf with a filtration

\[ 0 = \mathcal{F}_0 \subset \mathcal{F}_1 \subset \ldots \subset \mathcal{F}_ m = \mathcal{F} \]

by coherent subsheaves such that each of $\mathcal{F}_ i/\mathcal{F}_{i - 1}$ has property $\mathcal{P}$, then so does $\mathcal{F}$. This follows from the property (1) for $\mathcal{P}$. On the other hand, by Lemma 30.12.3 we can filter any $\mathcal{F}$ with successive subquotients as in (2). Hence the lemma follows. $\square$

Lemma 30.12.5. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $Z_0 \subset X$ be an irreducible closed subset with generic point $\xi $. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a property of coherent sheaves on $X$ with support contained in $Z_0$ such that

  1. For any short exact sequence of coherent sheaves if two out of three of them have property $\mathcal{P}$ then so does the third.

  2. For every integral closed subscheme $Z \subset Z_0 \subset X$, $Z \not= Z_0$ and every quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ Z$ we have $\mathcal{P}$ for $(Z \to X)_*\mathcal{I}$.

  3. There exists some coherent sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $X$ such that

    1. $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}) = Z_0$,

    2. $\mathcal{G}_\xi $ is annihilated by $\mathfrak m_\xi $,

    3. $\dim _{\kappa (\xi )} \mathcal{G}_\xi = 1$, and

    4. property $\mathcal{P}$ holds for $\mathcal{G}$.

Then property $\mathcal{P}$ holds for every coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ whose support is contained in $Z_0$.

Proof. First note that if $\mathcal{F}$ is a coherent sheaf with support contained in $Z_0$ with a filtration

\[ 0 = \mathcal{F}_0 \subset \mathcal{F}_1 \subset \ldots \subset \mathcal{F}_ m = \mathcal{F} \]

by coherent subsheaves such that each of $\mathcal{F}_ i/\mathcal{F}_{i - 1}$ has property $\mathcal{P}$, then so does $\mathcal{F}$. Or, if $\mathcal{F}$ has property $\mathcal{P}$ and all but one of the $\mathcal{F}_ i/\mathcal{F}_{i - 1}$ has property $\mathcal{P}$ then so does the last one. This follows from assumption (1).

As a first application we conclude that any coherent sheaf whose support is strictly contained in $Z_0$ has property $\mathcal{P}$. Namely, such a sheaf has a filtration (see Lemma 30.12.3) whose subquotients have property $\mathcal{P}$ according to (2).

Let $\mathcal{G}$ be as in (3). By Lemma 30.12.2 there exist a sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}$ on $Z_0$, an integer $r \geq 1$, and a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to \left((Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I}\right)^{\oplus r} \to \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{Q} \to 0 \]

where the support of $\mathcal{Q}$ is strictly contained in $Z_0$. By (3)(c) we see that $r = 1$. Since $\mathcal{Q}$ has property $\mathcal{P}$ too we conclude that $(Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I}$ has property $\mathcal{P}$.

Next, suppose that $\mathcal{I}' \not= 0$ is another quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals on $Z_0$. Then we can consider the intersection $\mathcal{I}'' = \mathcal{I}' \cap \mathcal{I}$ and we get two short exact sequences

\[ 0 \to (Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I}'' \to (Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{Q} \to 0 \]

and

\[ 0 \to (Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I}'' \to (Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I}' \to \mathcal{Q}' \to 0. \]

Note that the support of the coherent sheaves $\mathcal{Q}$ and $\mathcal{Q}'$ are strictly contained in $Z_0$. Hence $\mathcal{Q}$ and $\mathcal{Q}'$ have property $\mathcal{P}$ (see above). Hence we conclude using (1) that $(Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I}''$ and $(Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I}'$ both have $\mathcal{P}$ as well.

The final step of the proof is to note that any coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ whose support is contained in $Z_0$ has a filtration (see Lemma 30.12.3 again) whose subquotients all have property $\mathcal{P}$ by what we just said. $\square$

Lemma 30.12.6. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a property of coherent sheaves on $X$ such that

  1. For any short exact sequence of coherent sheaves if two out of three of them have property $\mathcal{P}$ then so does the third.

  2. For every integral closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ with generic point $\xi $ there exists some coherent sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ such that

    1. $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}) = Z$,

    2. $\mathcal{G}_\xi $ is annihilated by $\mathfrak m_\xi $,

    3. $\dim _{\kappa (\xi )} \mathcal{G}_\xi = 1$, and

    4. property $\mathcal{P}$ holds for $\mathcal{G}$.

Then property $\mathcal{P}$ holds for every coherent sheaf on $X$.

Proof. According to Lemma 30.12.4 it suffices to show that for all integral closed subschemes $Z \subset X$ and all quasi-coherent ideal sheaves $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ Z$ we have $\mathcal{P}$ for $(Z \to X)_*\mathcal{I}$. If this fails, then since $X$ is Noetherian there is a minimal integral closed subscheme $Z_0 \subset X$ such that $\mathcal{P}$ fails for $(Z_0 \to X)_*\mathcal{I}_0$ for some quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}_0 \subset \mathcal{O}_{Z_0}$, but $\mathcal{P}$ does hold for $(Z \to X)_*\mathcal{I}$ for all integral closed subschemes $Z \subset Z_0$, $Z \not= Z_0$ and quasi-coherent ideal sheaves $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ Z$. Since we have the existence of $\mathcal{G}$ for $Z_0$ by part (2), according to Lemma 30.12.5 this cannot happen. $\square$

Lemma 30.12.7. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $Z_0 \subset X$ be an irreducible closed subset with generic point $\xi $. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a property of coherent sheaves on $X$ such that

  1. For any short exact sequence of coherent sheaves

    \[ 0 \to \mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}_2 \to 0 \]

    if $\mathcal{F}_ i$, $i = 1, 2$ have property $\mathcal{P}$ then so does $\mathcal{F}$.

  2. If $\mathcal{P}$ holds for $\mathcal{F}^{\oplus r}$ for some $r \geq 1$, then it holds for $\mathcal{F}$.

  3. For every integral closed subscheme $Z \subset Z_0 \subset X$, $Z \not= Z_0$ and every quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ Z$ we have $\mathcal{P}$ for $(Z \to X)_*\mathcal{I}$.

  4. There exists some coherent sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ such that

    1. $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}) = Z_0$,

    2. $\mathcal{G}_\xi $ is annihilated by $\mathfrak m_\xi $, and

    3. for every quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ such that $\mathcal{J}_\xi = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }$ there exists a quasi-coherent subsheaf $\mathcal{G}' \subset \mathcal{J}\mathcal{G}$ with $\mathcal{G}'_\xi = \mathcal{G}_\xi $ and such that $\mathcal{P}$ holds for $\mathcal{G}'$.

Then property $\mathcal{P}$ holds for every coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ whose support is contained in $Z_0$.

Proof. Note that if $\mathcal{F}$ is a coherent sheaf with a filtration

\[ 0 = \mathcal{F}_0 \subset \mathcal{F}_1 \subset \ldots \subset \mathcal{F}_ m = \mathcal{F} \]

by coherent subsheaves such that each of $\mathcal{F}_ i/\mathcal{F}_{i - 1}$ has property $\mathcal{P}$, then so does $\mathcal{F}$. This follows from assumption (1).

As a first application we conclude that any coherent sheaf whose support is strictly contained in $Z_0$ has property $\mathcal{P}$. Namely, such a sheaf has a filtration (see Lemma 30.12.3) whose subquotients have property $\mathcal{P}$ according to (3).

Let us denote $i : Z_0 \to X$ the closed immersion. Consider a coherent sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ as in (4). By Lemma 30.12.2 there exists a sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}$ on $Z_0$ and a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to i_*\mathcal{I}^{\oplus r} \to \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{Q} \to 0 \]

where the support of $\mathcal{Q}$ is strictly contained in $Z_0$. In particular $r > 0$ and $\mathcal{I}$ is nonzero because the support of $\mathcal{G}$ is equal to $Z_0$. Let $\mathcal{I}' \subset \mathcal{I}$ be any nonzero quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals on $Z_0$ contained in $\mathcal{I}$. Then we also get a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to i_*(\mathcal{I}')^{\oplus r} \to \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{Q}' \to 0 \]

where $\mathcal{Q}'$ has support properly contained in $Z_0$. Let $\mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals cutting out the support of $\mathcal{Q}'$ (for example the ideal corresponding to the reduced induced closed subscheme structure on the support of $\mathcal{Q}'$). Then $\mathcal{J}_\xi = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }$. By Lemma 30.10.2 we see that $\mathcal{J}^ n\mathcal{Q}' = 0$ for some $n$. Hence $\mathcal{J}^ n\mathcal{G} \subset i_*(\mathcal{I}')^{\oplus r}$. By assumption (4)(c) of the lemma we see there exists a quasi-coherent subsheaf $\mathcal{G}' \subset \mathcal{J}^ n\mathcal{G}$ with $\mathcal{G}'_\xi = \mathcal{G}_\xi $ for which property $\mathcal{P}$ holds. Hence we get a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to \mathcal{G}' \to i_*(\mathcal{I}')^{\oplus r} \to \mathcal{Q}'' \to 0 \]

where $\mathcal{Q}''$ has support properly contained in $Z_0$. Thus by our initial remarks and property (1) of the lemma we conclude that $i_*(\mathcal{I}')^{\oplus r}$ satisfies $\mathcal{P}$. Hence we see that $i_*\mathcal{I}'$ satisfies $\mathcal{P}$ by (2). Finally, for an arbitrary quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}'' \subset \mathcal{O}_{Z_0}$ we can set $\mathcal{I}' = \mathcal{I}'' \cap \mathcal{I}$ and we get a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to i_*(\mathcal{I}') \to i_*(\mathcal{I}'') \to \mathcal{Q}''' \to 0 \]

where $\mathcal{Q}'''$ has support properly contained in $Z_0$. Hence we conclude that property $\mathcal{P}$ holds for $i_*\mathcal{I}''$ as well.

The final step of the proof is to note that any coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ whose support is contained in $Z_0$ has a filtration (see Lemma 30.12.3 again) whose subquotients all have property $\mathcal{P}$ by what we just said. $\square$

Lemma 30.12.8. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a property of coherent sheaves on $X$ such that

  1. For any short exact sequence of coherent sheaves

    \[ 0 \to \mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}_2 \to 0 \]

    if $\mathcal{F}_ i$, $i = 1, 2$ have property $\mathcal{P}$ then so does $\mathcal{F}$.

  2. If $\mathcal{P}$ holds for $\mathcal{F}^{\oplus r}$ for some $r \geq 1$, then it holds for $\mathcal{F}$.

  3. For every integral closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ with generic point $\xi $ there exists some coherent sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ such that

    1. $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G}) = Z$,

    2. $\mathcal{G}_\xi $ is annihilated by $\mathfrak m_\xi $, and

    3. for every quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ such that $\mathcal{J}_\xi = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi }$ there exists a quasi-coherent subsheaf $\mathcal{G}' \subset \mathcal{J}\mathcal{G}$ with $\mathcal{G}'_\xi = \mathcal{G}_\xi $ and such that $\mathcal{P}$ holds for $\mathcal{G}'$.

Then property $\mathcal{P}$ holds for every coherent sheaf on $X$.

Proof. Follows from Lemma 30.12.7 in exactly the same way that Lemma 30.12.6 follows from Lemma 30.12.5. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #5537 by David Liu on

In the proof of lemma 01YH, why does and have supports that are strictly contained in ?


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 01YC. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.