## 58.54 Vanishing of finite higher direct images

The next goal is to prove that the higher direct images of a finite morphism of schemes vanish.

Lemma 58.54.1. Let $R$ be a strictly henselian local ring. Set $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ and let $\overline{s}$ be its closed point. Then the global sections functor $\Gamma (S, -) : \textit{Ab}(S_{\acute{e}tale}) \to \textit{Ab}$ is exact. In fact we have $\Gamma (S, \mathcal{F}) = \mathcal{F}_{\overline{s}}$ for any sheaf of sets $\mathcal{F}$. In particular

$\forall p\geq 1, \quad H_{\acute{e}tale}^ p(S, \mathcal{F})=0$

for all $\mathcal{F}\in \textit{Ab}(S_{\acute{e}tale})$.

Proof. If we show that $\Gamma (S, \mathcal{F}) = \mathcal{F}_{\overline{s}}$ then $\Gamma (S, -)$ is exact as the stalk functor is exact. Let $(U, \overline{u})$ be an étale neighbourhood of $\overline{s}$. Pick an affine open neighborhood $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ of $\overline{u}$ in $U$. Then $R \to A$ is étale and $\kappa (\overline{s}) = \kappa (\overline{u})$. By Theorem 58.32.4 we see that $A \cong R \times A'$ as an $R$-algebra compatible with maps to $\kappa (\overline{s}) = \kappa (\overline{u})$. Hence we get a section

$\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar[r] & U \ar[d]\\ & S \ar[ul] }$

It follows that in the system of étale neighbourhoods of $\overline{s}$ the identity map $(S, \overline{s}) \to (S, \overline{s})$ is cofinal. Hence $\Gamma (S, \mathcal{F}) = \mathcal{F}_{\overline{s}}$. The final statement of the lemma follows as the higher derived functors of an exact functor are zero, see Derived Categories, Lemma 13.16.9. $\square$

Proposition 58.54.2. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite morphism of schemes.

1. For any geometric point $\overline{y} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to Y$ we have

$(f_*\mathcal{F})_{\overline{y}} = \prod \nolimits _{\overline{x} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X,\ f(\overline{x}) = \overline{y}} \mathcal{F}_{\overline{x}}.$

for $\mathcal{F}$ in $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale})$ and

$(f_*\mathcal{F})_{\overline{y}} = \bigoplus \nolimits _{\overline{x} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X,\ f(\overline{x}) = \overline{y}} \mathcal{F}_{\overline{x}}.$

for $\mathcal{F}$ in $\textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale})$.

2. For any $q \geq 1$ we have $R^ q f_*\mathcal{F} = 0$.

Proof. Let $X_{\overline{y}}^{sh}$ denote the fiber product $X \times _ Y \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y, \overline{y}}^{sh})$. By Theorem 58.52.1 the stalk of $R^ qf_*\mathcal{F}$ at $\overline{y}$ is computed by $H_{\acute{e}tale}^ q(X_{\overline{y}}^{sh}, \mathcal{F})$. Since $f$ is finite, $X_{\bar y}^{sh}$ is finite over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y, \overline{y}}^{sh})$, thus $X_{\bar y}^{sh} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ for some ring $A$ finite over $\mathcal{O}_{Y, \bar y}^{sh}$. Since the latter is strictly henselian, Lemma 58.32.5 implies that $A$ is a finite product of henselian local rings $A = A_1 \times \ldots \times A_ r$. Since the residue field of $\mathcal{O}_{Y, \overline{y}}^{sh}$ is separably closed the same is true for each $A_ i$. Hence $A_ i$ is strictly henselian. This implies that $X_{\overline{y}}^{sh} = \coprod _{i = 1}^ r \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i)$. The vanishing of Lemma 58.54.1 implies that $(R^ qf_*\mathcal{F})_{\overline{y}} = 0$ for $q > 0$ which implies (2) by Theorem 58.29.10. Part (1) follows from the corresponding statement of Lemma 58.54.1. $\square$

Lemma 58.54.3. Consider a cartesian square

$\xymatrix{ X' \ar[r]_{g'} \ar[d]_{f'} & X \ar[d]^ f \\ Y' \ar[r]^ g & Y }$

of schemes with $f$ a finite morphism. For any sheaf of sets $\mathcal{F}$ on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ we have $f'_*(g')^{-1}\mathcal{F} = g^{-1}f_*\mathcal{F}$.

Proof. In great generality there is a pullback map $g^{-1}f_*\mathcal{F} \to f'_*(g')^{-1}\mathcal{F}$, see Sites, Section 7.45. It suffices to check on stalks (Theorem 58.29.10). Let $\overline{y}' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to Y'$ be a geometric point. We have

\begin{align*} (f'_*(g')^{-1}\mathcal{F})_{\overline{y}'} & = \prod \nolimits _{\overline{x}' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X',\ f' \circ \overline{x}' = \overline{y}'} ((g')^{-1}\mathcal{F})_{\overline{x}'} \\ & = \prod \nolimits _{\overline{x}' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X',\ f' \circ \overline{x}' = \overline{y}'} \mathcal{F}_{g' \circ \overline{x}'} \\ & = \prod \nolimits _{\overline{x} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X,\ f \circ \overline{x} = g \circ \overline{y}'} \mathcal{F}_{\overline{x}} \\ & = (f_*\mathcal{F})_{g \circ \overline{y}'} \\ & = (g^{-1}f_*\mathcal{F})_{\overline{y}'} \end{align*}

The first equality by Proposition 58.54.2. The second equality by Lemma 58.36.2. The third equality holds because the diagram is a cartesian square and hence the map

$\{ \overline{x}' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X',\ f' \circ \overline{x}' = \overline{y}'\} \longrightarrow \{ \overline{x} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X,\ f \circ \overline{x} = g \circ \overline{y}'\}$

sending $\overline{x}'$ to $g' \circ \overline{x}'$ is a bijection. The fourth equality by Proposition 58.54.2. The fifth equality by Lemma 58.36.2. $\square$

Lemma 58.54.4. Consider a cartesian square

$\xymatrix{ X' \ar[r]_{g'} \ar[d]_{f'} & X \ar[d]^ f \\ Y' \ar[r]^ g & Y }$

of schemes with $f$ an integral morphism. For any sheaf of sets $\mathcal{F}$ on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ we have $f'_*(g')^{-1}\mathcal{F} = g^{-1}f_*\mathcal{F}$.

Proof. The question is local on $Y$ and hence we may assume $Y$ is affine. Then we can write $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i$ with $f_ i : X_ i \to Y$ finite (this is easy in the affine case, but see Limits, Lemma 32.7.2 for a reference). Denote $p_{i'i} : X_{i'} \to X_ i$ the transition morphisms and $p_ i : X \to X_ i$ the projections. Setting $\mathcal{F}_ i = p_{i, *}\mathcal{F}$ we obtain from Lemma 58.51.9 a system $(\mathcal{F}_ i, \varphi _{i'i})$ with $\mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits p_ i^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ i$. We get $f_*\mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}_ i$ from Lemma 58.51.7. Set $X'_ i = Y' \times _ Y X_ i$ with projections $f'_ i$ and $g'_ i$. Then $X' = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X'_ i$ as limits commute with limits. Denote $p'_ i : X' \to X'_ i$ the projections. We have

\begin{align*} g^{-1}f_*\mathcal{F} & = g^{-1} \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}_ i \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits g^{-1}f_{i, *}\mathcal{F}_ i \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits f'_{i, *}(g'_ i)^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ i \\ & = f'_*(\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits (p'_ i)^{-1}(g'_ i)^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ i) \\ & = f'_*(\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits (g')^{-1}p_ i^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ i) \\ & = f'_*(g')^{-1} \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits p_ i^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ i \\ & = f'_*(g')^{-1}\mathcal{F} \end{align*}

as desired. For the first equality see above. For the second use that pullback commutes with colimits. For the third use the finite case, see Lemma 58.54.3. For the fourth use Lemma 58.51.7. For the fifth use that $g'_ i \circ p'_ i = p_ i \circ g'$. For the sixth use that pullback commutes with colimits. For the seventh use $\mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits p_ i^{-1}\mathcal{F}_ i$. $\square$

The following lemma is a case of cohomological descent dealing with étale sheaves and finite surjective morphisms. We will significantly generalize this result once we prove the proper base change theorem.

Lemma 58.54.5. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a surjective finite morphism of schemes. Set $f_ n : X_ n \to Y$ equal to the $(n + 1)$-fold fibre product of $X$ over $Y$. For $\mathcal{F} \in \textit{Ab}(Y_{\acute{e}tale})$ set $\mathcal{F}_ n = f_{n, *}f_ n^{-1}\mathcal{F}$. There is an exact sequence

$0 \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}_0 \to \mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F}_2 \to \ldots$

on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$. Moreover, there is a spectral sequence

$E_1^{p, q} = H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(X_ p, f_ p^{-1}\mathcal{F})$

converging to $H^{p + q}(Y_{\acute{e}tale}, \mathcal{F})$. This spectral sequence is functorial in $\mathcal{F}$.

Proof. If we prove the first statement of the lemma, then we obtain a spectral sequence with $E_1^{p, q} = H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Y, \mathcal{F})$ converging to $H^{p + q}(Y_{\acute{e}tale}, \mathcal{F})$, see Derived Categories, Lemma 13.21.3. On the other hand, since $R^ if_{p, *}f_ p^{-1}\mathcal{F} = 0$ for $i > 0$ (Proposition 58.54.2) we get

$H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(X_ p, f_ p^{-1}\mathcal{F}) = H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Y, f_{p, *}f_ p^{-1} \mathcal{F}) = H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Y, \mathcal{F}_ p)$

by Proposition 58.53.2 and we get the spectral sequence of the lemma.

To prove the first statement of the lemma, observe that $X_ n$ forms a simplicial scheme over $Y$, see Simplicial, Example 14.3.5. Observe moreover, that for each of the projections $d_ j : X_{n + 1} \to X_ n$ there is a map $d_ j^{-1} f_ n^{-1}\mathcal{F} \to f_{n + 1}^{-1}\mathcal{F}$. These maps induce maps

$\delta _ j : \mathcal{F}_ n \to \mathcal{F}_{n + 1}$

for $j = 0, \ldots , n + 1$. We use the alternating sum of these maps to define the differentials $\mathcal{F}_ n \to \mathcal{F}_{n + 1}$. Similarly, there is a canonical augmentation $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}_0$, namely this is just the canonical map $\mathcal{F} \to f_*f^{-1}\mathcal{F}$. To check that this sequence of sheaves is an exact complex it suffices to check on stalks at geometric points (Theorem 58.29.10). Thus we let $\overline{y} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to Y$ be a geometric point. Let $E = \{ \overline{x} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to X \mid f(\overline{x}) = \overline{y}\}$. Then $E$ is a finite nonempty set and we see that

$(\mathcal{F}_ n)_{\overline{y}} = \bigoplus \nolimits _{e \in E^{n + 1}} \mathcal{F}_{\overline{y}}$

by Proposition 58.54.2 and Lemma 58.36.2. Thus we have to see that given an abelian group $M$ the sequence

$0 \to M \to \bigoplus \nolimits _{e \in E} M \to \bigoplus \nolimits _{e \in E^2} M \to \ldots$

is exact. Here the first map is the diagonal map and the map $\bigoplus _{e \in E^{n + 1}} M \to \bigoplus _{e \in E^{n + 2}} M$ is the alternating sum of the maps induced by the $(n + 2)$ projections $E^{n + 2} \to E^{n + 1}$. This can be shown directly or deduced by applying Simplicial, Lemma 14.26.9 to the map $E \to \{ *\}$. $\square$

Remark 58.54.6. In the situation of Lemma 58.54.5 if $\mathcal{G}$ is a sheaf of sets on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$, then we have

$\Gamma (Y, \mathcal{G}) = \text{Equalizer}( \xymatrix{ \Gamma (X_0, f_0^{-1}\mathcal{G}) \ar@<1ex>[r] \ar@<-1ex>[r] & \Gamma (X_1, f_1^{-1}\mathcal{G}) } )$

This is proved in exactly the same way, by showing that the sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ is the equalizer of the two maps $f_{0, *}f_0^{-1}\mathcal{G} \to f_{1, *}f_1^{-1}\mathcal{G}$.

## Comments (1)

Comment #4090 by Tongmu on

Typos: in the statement of lemma 58.54.5, in the beginning of the fourth line, it should be "on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$"; in the proof of lemma 58.54.5, in the beginning of the second line, it should be "$E_1^{p, q} = H^ q_{\acute{e}tale}(Y, \mathcal{F}^p)$".

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 03QN. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.