The Stacks project

38.15 Impurities

We want to formalize the phenomenon of which we gave examples in Section 38.14 in terms of specializations of points of $\text{Ass}_{X/S}(\mathcal{F})$. We also want to work locally around a point $s \in S$. In order to do so we make the following definitions.

Situation 38.15.1. Here $S$, $X$ are schemes and $f : X \to S$ is a finite type morphism. Also, $\mathcal{F}$ is a finite type quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Finally $s$ is a point of $S$.

In this situation consider a morphism $g : T \to S$, a point $t \in T$ with $g(t) = s$, a specialization $t' \leadsto t$, and a point $\xi \in X_ T$ in the base change of $X$ lying over $t'$. Picture

38.15.1.1
\begin{equation} \label{flat-equation-impurity} \vcenter { \xymatrix{ \xi \ar@{|->}[d] & \\ t' \ar@{~>}[r] & t \ar@{|->}[r] & s } } \quad \quad \vcenter { \xymatrix{ X_ T \ar[d] \ar[r] & X \ar[d] \\ T \ar[r]^ g & S } } \end{equation}

Moreover, denote $\mathcal{F}_ T$ the pullback of $\mathcal{F}$ to $X_ T$.

Definition 38.15.2. In Situation 38.15.1 we say a diagram (38.15.1.1) defines an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ if $\xi \in \text{Ass}_{X_ T/T}(\mathcal{F}_ T)$ and $\overline{\{ \xi \} } \cap X_ t = \emptyset $. We will indicate this by saying “let $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ be an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$”.

Lemma 38.15.3. In Situation 38.15.1. If there exists an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$, then there exists an impurity $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ such that $g$ is locally of finite presentation and $t$ a closed point of the fibre of $g$ above $s$.

Proof. Let $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ be any impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$. We apply Limits, Lemma 32.14.1 to $t \in T$ and $Z = \overline{\{ \xi \} }$ to obtain an open neighbourhood $V \subset T$ of $t$, a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ V \ar[d] \ar[r]_ a & T' \ar[d]^ b \\ T \ar[r]^ g & S, } \]

and a closed subscheme $Z' \subset X_{T'}$ such that

  1. the morphism $b : T' \to S$ is locally of finite presentation,

  2. we have $Z' \cap X_{a(t)} = \emptyset $, and

  3. $Z \cap X_ V$ maps into $Z'$ via the morphism $X_ V \to X_{T'}$.

As $t'$ specializes to $t$ we may replace $T$ by the open neighbourhood $V$ of $t$. Thus we have a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ X_ T \ar[d] \ar[r] & X_{T'} \ar[d] \ar[r] & X \ar[d] \\ T \ar[r]^ a & T' \ar[r]^ b & S } \]

where $b \circ a = g$. Let $\xi ' \in X_{T'}$ denote the image of $\xi $. By Divisors, Lemma 31.7.3 we see that $\xi ' \in \text{Ass}_{X_{T'}/T'}(\mathcal{F}_{T'})$. Moreover, by construction the closure of $\overline{\{ \xi '\} }$ is contained in the closed subset $Z'$ which avoids the fibre $X_{a(t)}$. In this way we see that $(T' \to S, a(t') \leadsto a(t), \xi ')$ is an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$.

Thus we may assume that $g : T \to S$ is locally of finite presentation. Let $Z = \overline{\{ \xi \} }$. By assumption $Z_ t = \emptyset $. By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.22.1 this means that $Z_{t''} = \emptyset $ for $t''$ in an open subset of $\overline{\{ t\} }$. Since the fibre of $T \to S$ over $s$ is a Jacobson scheme, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.16.10 we find that there exist a closed point $t'' \in \overline{\{ t\} }$ such that $Z_{t''} = \emptyset $. Then $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t'', \xi )$ is the desired impurity. $\square$

Lemma 38.15.4. In Situation 38.15.1. Let $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ be an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$. Assume $T = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} T_ i$ is a directed limit of affine schemes over $S$. Then for some $i$ the triple $(T_ i \to S, t'_ i \leadsto t_ i, \xi _ i)$ is an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$.

Proof. The notation in the statement means this: Let $p_ i : T \to T_ i$ be the projection morphisms, let $t_ i = p_ i(t)$ and $t'_ i = p_ i(t')$. Finally $\xi _ i \in X_{T_ i}$ is the image of $\xi $. By Divisors, Lemma 31.7.3 it is true that $\xi _ i$ is a point of the relative assassin of $\mathcal{F}_{T_ i}$ over $T_ i$. Thus the only point is to show that $\overline{\{ \xi _ i\} } \cap X_{t_ i} = \emptyset $ for some $i$.

First proof. Let $Z_ i = \overline{\{ \xi _ i\} } \subset X_{T_ i}$ and $Z = \overline{\{ \xi \} } \subset X_ T$ endowed with the reduced induced scheme structure. Then $Z = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i$ by Limits, Lemma 32.4.4. Choose a field $k$ and a morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to T$ whose image is $t$. Then

\[ \emptyset = Z \times _ T \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) = (\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i) \times _{(\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits T_ i)} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i \times _{T_ i} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \]

because limits commute with fibred products (limits commute with limits). Each $Z_ i \times _{T_ i} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ is quasi-compact because $X_{T_ i} \to T_ i$ is of finite type and hence $Z_ i \to T_ i$ is of finite type. Hence $Z_ i \times _{T_ i} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ is empty for some $i$ by Limits, Lemma 32.4.3. Since the image of the composition $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to T \to T_ i$ is $t_ i$ we obtain what we want.

Second proof. Set $Z = \overline{\{ \xi \} }$. Apply Limits, Lemma 32.14.1 to this situation to obtain an open neighbourhood $V \subset T$ of $t$, a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ V \ar[d] \ar[r]_ a & T' \ar[d]^ b \\ T \ar[r]^ g & S, } \]

and a closed subscheme $Z' \subset X_{T'}$ such that

  1. the morphism $b : T' \to S$ is locally of finite presentation,

  2. we have $Z' \cap X_{a(t)} = \emptyset $, and

  3. $Z \cap X_ V$ maps into $Z'$ via the morphism $X_ V \to X_{T'}$.

We may assume $V$ is an affine open of $T$, hence by Limits, Lemmas 32.4.11 and 32.4.13 we can find an $i$ and an affine open $V_ i \subset T_ i$ with $V = f_ i^{-1}(V_ i)$. By Limits, Proposition 32.6.1 after possibly increasing $i$ a bit we can find a morphism $a_ i : V_ i \to T'$ such that $a = a_ i \circ f_ i|_ V$. The induced morphism $X_{V_ i} \to X_{T'}$ maps $\xi _ i$ into $Z'$. As $Z' \cap X_{a(t)} = \emptyset $ we conclude that $(T_ i \to S, t'_ i \leadsto t_ i, \xi _ i)$ is an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$. $\square$

Lemma 38.15.5. In Situation 38.15.1. If there exists an impurity $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ with $g$ quasi-finite at $t$, then there exists an impurity $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ such that $(T, t) \to (S, s)$ is an elementary étale neighbourhood.

Proof. Let $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ be an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ such that $g$ is quasi-finite at $t$. After shrinking $T$ we may assume that $g$ is locally of finite type. Apply More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.37.1 to $T \to S$ and $t \mapsto s$. This gives us a diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ T \ar[d] & T \times _ S U \ar[l] \ar[d] & V \ar[l] \ar[ld] \\ S & U \ar[l] } \]

where $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ is an elementary étale neighbourhood and $V \subset T \times _ S U$ is an open neighbourhood of $v = (t, u)$ such that $V \to U$ is finite and such that $v$ is the unique point of $V$ lying over $u$. Since the morphism $V \to T$ is étale hence flat we see that there exists a specialization $v' \leadsto v$ such that $v' \mapsto t'$. Note that $\kappa (t') \subset \kappa (v')$ is finite separable. Pick any point $\zeta \in X_{v'}$ mapping to $\xi \in X_{t'}$. By Divisors, Lemma 31.7.3 we see that $\zeta \in \text{Ass}_{X_ V/V}(\mathcal{F}_ V)$. Moreover, the closure $\overline{\{ \zeta \} }$ does not meet the fibre $X_ v$ as by assumption the closure $\overline{\{ \xi \} }$ does not meet $X_ t$. In other words $(V \to S, v' \leadsto v, \zeta )$ is an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $S$.

Next, let $u' \in U'$ be the image of $v'$ and let $\theta \in X_ U$ be the image of $\zeta $. Then $\theta \mapsto u'$ and $u' \leadsto u$. By Divisors, Lemma 31.7.3 we see that $\theta \in \text{Ass}_{X_ U/U}(\mathcal{F})$. Moreover, as $\pi : X_ V \to X_ U$ is finite we see that $\pi \big (\overline{\{ \zeta \} }\big ) = \overline{\{ \pi (\zeta )\} }$. Since $v$ is the unique point of $V$ lying over $u$ we see that $X_ u \cap \overline{\{ \pi (\zeta )\} } = \emptyset $ because $X_ v \cap \overline{\{ \zeta \} } = \emptyset $. In this way we conclude that $(U \to S, u' \leadsto u, \theta )$ is an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ and we win. $\square$

Lemma 38.15.6. In Situation 38.15.1. Assume that $S$ is locally Noetherian. If there exists an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$, then there exists an impurity $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ such that $g$ is quasi-finite at $t$.

Proof. We may replace $S$ by an affine neighbourhood of $s$. By Lemma 38.15.3 we may assume that we have an impurity $(g : T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ of such that $g$ is locally of finite type and $t$ a closed point of the fibre of $g$ above $s$. We may replace $T$ by the reduced induced scheme structure on $\overline{\{ t'\} }$. Let $Z = \overline{\{ \xi \} } \subset X_ T$. By assumption $Z_ t = \emptyset $ and the image of $Z \to T$ contains $t'$. By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.23.1 there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Z$ such that for any $w \in f(V)$ any generic point $\xi '$ of $V_ w$ is in $\text{Ass}_{X_ T/T}(\mathcal{F}_ T)$. By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.22.2 there exists a nonempty open $W \subset T$ with $W \subset f(V)$. By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.48.7 there exists a closed subscheme $T' \subset T$ such that $t \in T'$, $T' \to S$ is quasi-finite at $t$, and there exists a point $z \in T' \cap W$, $z \leadsto t$ which does not map to $s$. Choose any generic point $\xi '$ of the nonempty scheme $V_ z$. Then $(T' \to S, z \leadsto t, \xi ')$ is the desired impurity. $\square$

In the following we will use the henselization $S^ h = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^ h)$ of $S$ at $s$, see Étale Cohomology, Definition 58.33.2. Since $S^ h \to S$ maps to closed point of $S^ h$ to $s$ and induces an isomorphism of residue fields, we will indicate $s \in S^ h$ this closed point also. Thus $(S^ h, s) \to (S, s)$ is a morphism of pointed schemes.

Lemma 38.15.7. In Situation 38.15.1. If there exists an impurity $(S^ h \to S, s' \leadsto s, \xi )$ of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ then there exists an impurity $(T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ where $(T, t) \to (S, s)$ is an elementary étale neighbourhood.

Proof. We may replace $S$ by an affine neighbourhood of $s$. Say $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ and $s$ corresponds to the prime $\mathfrak p \subset A$. Then $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^ h = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{(T, t)} \Gamma (T, \mathcal{O}_ T)$ where the limit is over the opposite of the cofiltered category of affine elementary étale neighbourhoods $(T, t)$ of $(S, s)$, see More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.32.5 and its proof. Hence $S^ h = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i T_ i$ and we win by Lemma 38.15.4. $\square$

Lemma 38.15.8. In Situation 38.15.1 the following are equivalent

  1. there exists an impurity $(S^ h \to S, s' \leadsto s, \xi )$ of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ where $S^ h$ is the henselization of $S$ at $s$,

  2. there exists an impurity $(T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ such that $(T, t) \to (S, s)$ is an elementary étale neighbourhood, and

  3. there exists an impurity $(T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ such that $T \to S$ is quasi-finite at $t$.

Proof. As an étale morphism is locally quasi-finite it is clear that (2) implies (3). We have seen that (3) implies (2) in Lemma 38.15.5. We have seen that (1) implies (2) in Lemma 38.15.7. Finally, if $(T \to S, t' \leadsto t, \xi )$ is an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$ such that $(T, t) \to (S, s)$ is an elementary étale neighbourhood, then we can choose a factorization $S^ h \to T \to S$ of the structure morphism $S^ h \to S$. Choose any point $s' \in S^ h$ mapping to $t'$ and choose any $\xi ' \in X_{s'}$ mapping to $\xi \in X_{t'}$. Then $(S^ h \to S, s' \leadsto s, \xi ')$ is an impurity of $\mathcal{F}$ above $s$. We omit the details. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05IW. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.