Proposition 10.109.1. Let $R$ be a regular local ring of dimension $d$. Every finite $R$-module $M$ of depth $e$ has a finite free resolution

In particular a regular local ring has global dimension $\leq d$.

We can use the material on rings of finite global dimension to give another characterization of regular local rings.

Proposition 10.109.1. Let $R$ be a regular local ring of dimension $d$. Every finite $R$-module $M$ of depth $e$ has a finite free resolution

\[ 0 \to F_{d-e} \to \ldots \to F_0 \to M \to 0. \]

In particular a regular local ring has global dimension $\leq d$.

**Proof.**
The first part holds in view of Lemma 10.105.6 and Lemma 10.103.9. The last part follows from this and Lemma 10.108.12.
$\square$

Lemma 10.109.2. Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring. Then $R$ has finite global dimension if and only if there exists an integer $n$ such that for all maximal ideals $\mathfrak m$ of $R$ the ring $R_{\mathfrak m}$ has global dimension $\leq n$.

**Proof.**
We saw, Lemma 10.108.13 that if $R$ has finite global dimension $n$, then all the localizations $R_{\mathfrak m}$ have finite global dimension at most $n$. Conversely, suppose that all the $R_{\mathfrak m}$ have global dimension $n$. Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module. Let $0 \to K_ n \to F_{n-1} \to \ldots \to F_0 \to M \to 0$ be a resolution with $F_ i$ finite free. Then $K_ n$ is a finite $R$-module. According to Lemma 10.108.3 and the assumption all the modules $K_ n \otimes _ R R_{\mathfrak m}$ are projective. Hence by Lemma 10.77.2 the module $K_ n$ is finite projective.
$\square$

Lemma 10.109.3. Suppose that $R$ is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal $\mathfrak m$ and residue field $\kappa $. In this case the projective dimension of $\kappa $ is $\geq \dim _\kappa \mathfrak m / \mathfrak m^2$.

**Proof.**
Let $x_1 , \ldots , x_ n$ be elements of $\mathfrak m$ whose images in $\mathfrak m / \mathfrak m^2$ form a basis. Consider the *Koszul complex* on $x_1, \ldots , x_ n$. This is the complex

\[ 0 \to \wedge ^ n R^ n \to \wedge ^{n-1} R^ n \to \wedge ^{n-2} R^ n \to \ldots \to \wedge ^ i R^ n \to \ldots \to R^ n \to R \]

with maps given by

\[ e_{j_1} \wedge \ldots \wedge e_{j_ i} \longmapsto \sum _{a = 1}^ i (-1)^{i + 1} x_{j_ a} e_{j_1} \wedge \ldots \wedge \hat e_{j_ a} \wedge \ldots \wedge e_{j_ i} \]

It is easy to see that this is a complex $K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet })$. Note that the cokernel of the last map of $K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet })$ is $\kappa $ by Lemma 10.19.1 part (8).

If $\kappa $ has finite projective dimension $d$, then we can find a resolution $F_{\bullet } \to \kappa $ by finite free $R$-modules of length $d$ (Lemma 10.108.7). By Lemma 10.101.2 we may assume all the maps in the complex $F_{\bullet }$ have the property that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(F_ i \to F_{i-1}) \subset \mathfrak m F_{i-1}$, because removing a trivial summand from the resolution can at worst shorten the resolution. By Lemma 10.70.4 we can find a map of complexes $\alpha : K_{\bullet }(R, x_{\bullet }) \to F_{\bullet }$ inducing the identity on $\kappa $. We will prove by induction that the maps $\alpha _ i : \wedge ^ i R^ n = K_ i(R, x_{\bullet }) \to F_ i$ have the property that $\alpha _ i \otimes \kappa : \wedge ^ i \kappa ^ n \to F_ i \otimes \kappa $ are injective. This shows that $F_ n \not= 0$ and hence $d \geq n$ as desired.

The result is clear for $i = 0$ because the composition $R \xrightarrow {\alpha _0} F_0 \to \kappa $ is nonzero. Note that $F_0$ must have rank $1$ since otherwise the map $F_1 \to F_0$ whose cokernel is a single copy of $\kappa $ cannot have image contained in $\mathfrak m F_0$.

Next we check the case $i = 1$ as we feel that it is instructive; the reader can skip this as the induction step will deduce the $i = 1$ case from the case $i = 0$. We saw above that $F_0 = R$ and $F_1 \to F_0 = R$ has image $\mathfrak m$. We have a commutative diagram

\[ \begin{matrix} R^ n
& =
& K_1(R, x_{\bullet })
& \to
& K_0(R, x_{\bullet })
& =
& R
\\ & & \downarrow
& & \downarrow
& & \downarrow
\\ & & F_1
& \to
& F_0
& =
& R
\end{matrix} \]

where the rightmost vertical arrow is given by multiplication by a unit. Hence we see that the image of the composition $R^ n \to F_1 \to F_0 = R$ is also equal to $\mathfrak m$. Thus the map $R^ n \otimes \kappa \to F_1 \otimes \kappa $ has to be injective since $\dim _\kappa (\mathfrak m / \mathfrak m^2) = n$.

Let $i \geq 1$ and assume injectivity of $\alpha _ j \otimes \kappa $ has been proved for all $j \leq i - 1$. Consider the commutative diagram

\[ \begin{matrix} \wedge ^ i R^ n
& =
& K_ i(R, x_{\bullet })
& \to
& K_{i-1}(R, x_{\bullet })
& =
& \wedge ^{i-1} R^ n
\\ & & \downarrow
& & \downarrow
& & \\ & & F_ i
& \to
& F_{i-1}
& & \end{matrix} \]

We know that $\wedge ^{i-1} \kappa ^ n \to F_{i-1} \otimes \kappa $ is injective. This proves that $\wedge ^{i-1} \kappa ^ n \otimes _{\kappa } \mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2 \to F_{i-1} \otimes \mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2$ is injective. Also, by our choice of the complex, $F_ i$ maps into $\mathfrak mF_{i-1}$, and similarly for the Koszul complex. Hence we get a commutative diagram

\[ \begin{matrix} \wedge ^ i \kappa ^ n
& \to
& \wedge ^{i-1} \kappa ^ n \otimes \mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2
\\ \downarrow
& & \downarrow
\\ F_ i \otimes \kappa
& \to
& F_{i-1} \otimes \mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2
\end{matrix} \]

At this point it suffices to verify the map $\wedge ^ i \kappa ^ n \to \wedge ^{i-1} \kappa ^ n \otimes \mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2$ is injective, which can be done by hand. $\square$

Lemma 10.109.4. Let $R$ be a Noetherian local ring. Suppose that the residue field $\kappa $ has finite projective dimension $n$ over $R$. In this case $\dim (R) \geq n$.

**Proof.**
Let $F_{\bullet }$ be a finite resolution of $\kappa $ by finite free $R$-modules (Lemma 10.108.7). By Lemma 10.101.2 we may assume all the maps in the complex $F_{\bullet }$ have to property that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(F_ i \to F_{i-1}) \subset \mathfrak m F_{i-1}$, because removing a trivial summand from the resolution can at worst shorten the resolution. Say $F_ n \not= 0$ and $F_ i = 0$ for $i > n$, so that the projective dimension of $\kappa $ is $n$. By Proposition 10.101.9 we see that $\text{depth}_{I(\varphi _ n)}(R) \geq n$ since $I(\varphi _ n)$ cannot equal $R$ by our choice of the complex. Thus by Lemma 10.71.3 also $\dim (R) \geq n$.
$\square$

Proposition 10.109.5. A Noetherian local ring whose residue field has finite projective dimension is a regular local ring. In particular a Noetherian local ring of finite global dimension is a regular local ring.

**Proof.**
By Lemmas 10.109.3 and 10.109.4 we see that $\dim (R) \geq \dim _\kappa (\mathfrak m /\mathfrak m^2)$. Thus the result follows immediately from Definition 10.59.9.
$\square$

Lemma 10.109.6. A Noetherian local ring $R$ is a regular local ring if and only if it has finite global dimension. In this case $R_{\mathfrak p}$ is a regular local ring for all primes $\mathfrak p$.

**Proof.**
By Propositions 10.109.5 and 10.109.1 we see that a Noetherian local ring is a regular local ring if and only if it has finite global dimension. Furthermore, any localization $R_{\mathfrak p}$ has finite global dimension, see Lemma 10.108.13, and hence is a regular local ring.
$\square$

By Lemma 10.109.6 it makes sense to make the following definition, because it does not conflict with the earlier definition of a regular local ring.

Definition 10.109.7. A Noetherian ring $R$ is said to be *regular* if all the localizations $R_{\mathfrak p}$ at primes are regular local rings.

It is enough to require the local rings at maximal ideals to be regular. Note that this is not the same as asking $R$ to have finite global dimension, even assuming $R$ is Noetherian. This is because there is an example of a regular Noetherian ring which does not have finite global dimension, namely because it does not have finite dimension.

Lemma 10.109.8. Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring. The following are equivalent:

$R$ has finite global dimension $n$,

there exists an integer $n$ such that all the localizations $R_{\mathfrak m}$ at maximal ideals are regular of dimension $\leq n$ with equality for at least one $\mathfrak m$, and

there exists an integer $n$ such that all the localizations $R_{\mathfrak p}$ at prime ideals are regular of dimension $\leq n$ with equality for at least one $\mathfrak p$.

**Proof.**
This is a reformulation of Lemma 10.109.2 in view of the discussion surrounding Definition 10.109.7. See especially Propositions 10.109.1 and 10.109.5.
$\square$

Lemma 10.109.9. Let $R \to S$ be a local homomorphism of local Noetherian rings. Assume that $R \to S$ is flat and that $S$ is regular. Then $R$ is regular.

**Proof.**
Let $\mathfrak m \subset R$ be the maximal ideal and let $\kappa = R/\mathfrak m$ be the residue field. Let $d = \dim S$. Choose any resolution $F_\bullet \to \kappa $ with each $F_ i$ a finite free $R$-module. Set $K_ d = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(F_{d - 1} \to F_{d - 2})$. By flatness of $R \to S$ the complex $0 \to K_ d \otimes _ R S \to F_{d - 1} \otimes _ R S \to \ldots \to F_0 \otimes _ R S \to \kappa \otimes _ R S \to 0$ is still exact. Because the global dimension of $S$ is $d$, see Proposition 10.109.1, we see that $K_ d \otimes _ R S$ is a finite free $S$-module (see also Lemma 10.108.3). By Lemma 10.77.5 we see that $K_ d$ is a finite free $R$-module. Hence $\kappa $ has finite projective dimension and $R$ is regular by Proposition 10.109.5.
$\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)